Commandline arguments influence whether incremental compilation
can use its compilation cache and thus their changes relative to
previous compilation sessions need to be taking into account. This
commit makes sure that one has to specify for every commandline
argument whether it influences incremental compilation or not.
Better attribute and metaitem encapsulation throughout the compiler
This PR refactors most (hopefully all?) of the `MetaItem` interactions outside of `libsyntax` (and a few inside) to interact with MetaItems through the provided traits instead of directly creating / destruct / matching against them. This is a necessary first step to eventually converting `MetaItem`s to internally use `TokenStream` representations (which will make `MetaItem` interactions much nicer for macro writers once the new macro system is in place).
r? @nrc
Since we can know which targets are instantiable on a particular host,
it does not make sense to list invalid targets in the target print code.
Filter the list of targets to only include the targets that can be
instantiated.
Major changes:
- Remove old snippet rendering code and use the new stuff.
- Introduce `span_label` method to add a label
- Remove EndSpan mode and replace with a fn to get the last
character of a span.
- Stop using `Option<MultiSpan>` and just use an empty `MultiSpan`
- and probably a bunch of other stuff :)
rustc_driver: Allow running the compiler with a FileLoader
cc @nrc. I chose to implement this in such a way that it doesn't break anything. Please let me know if you want me to change anything.
In fact, we make JSOn the default and add an option for save-analysis-csv for the legacy behaviour.
We also rename some bits and pieces `dxr` -> `save-analysis`
Save/load incremental compilation dep graph
Contains the code to serialize/deserialize the dep graph to disk between executions. We also hash the item contents and compare to the new hashes. Also includes a unit test harness. There are definitely some known limitations, such as https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32014 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/32015, but I am leaving those for follow-up work.
Note that this PR builds on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/32007, so the overlapping commits can be excluded from review.
r? @michaelwoerister
/# This is a combination of 16 commits.
/# The first commit's message is:
allow RUST_BACKTRACE=disabled to act as if unset
When RUST_BACKTRACE is set to "disabled" then this acts as if the env.
var is unset.
/# This is the 2nd commit message:
case insensitive "DiSaBLeD" RUST_BACKTRACE value
previously it expected a lowercase "disabled" to treat the env. var as
unset
/# This is the 3rd commit message:
RUST_BACKTRACE=0 acts as if unset
previously RUST_BACKTRACE=disabled was doing the same thing
/# This is the 4th commit message:
RUST_BACKTRACE=0|n|no|off acts as if unset
previously only RUST_BACKTRACE=0 acted as if RUST_BACKTRACE was unset
Now added more options (case-insensitive): 'n','no' and 'off'
eg. RUST_BACKTRACE=oFF
/# This is the 5th commit message:
DRY on the value of 2
DRY=don't repeat yourself
Because having to remember to keep the two places of '2' in sync is not
ideal, even though this is a simple enough case.
/# This is the 6th commit message:
Revert "DRY on the value of 2"
This reverts commit 95a0479d5cf72a2b2d9d21ec0bed2823ed213fef.
Nevermind this DRY on 2, because we already have a RY on 1,
besides the code is less readable this way...
/# This is the 7th commit message:
attempt to document unsetting RUST_BACKTRACE
/# This is the 8th commit message:
curb allocations when checking for RUST_BACKTRACE
this means we don't check for case-insensitivity anymore
/# This is the 9th commit message:
as decided, RUST_BACKTRACE=0 turns off backtrace
/# This is the 10th commit message:
RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE=0 acts as if unset
(that is, capture is on)
Any other value acts as if nocapture is enabled (that is, capture is off)
/# This is the 11th commit message:
update other RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE occurrences
apparently only one place needs updating
/# This is the 12th commit message:
update RUST_BACKTRACE in man page
/# This is the 13th commit message:
handle an occurrence of RUST_BACKTRACE
/# This is the 14th commit message:
ensure consistency with new rules for backtrace
/# This is the 15th commit message:
a more concise comment for RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE
/# This is the 16th commit message:
update RUST_TEST_NOCAPTURE in man page
