Because that's now the only crate that uses it.
Moving stuff out of `rustc_middle` is always welcome.
I chose to use `impl crate::MirPass`/`impl crate::MirLint` (with
explicit `crate::`) everywhere because that's the only mention of
`MirPass`/`MirLint` used in all of these files. (Prior to this change,
`MirPass` was mostly imported via `use rustc_middle::mir::*` items.)
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #129152 (custom/external clippy support for bootstrapping)
- #129311 (don't copy `.rustc-dev-contents` from CI rustc)
- #129800 (Move the Windows remove_dir_all impl into a module and make it more race resistant)
- #129860 (update `object` dependency to remove duplicate `wasmparser`)
- #129885 (chore: remove repetitive words)
- #129913 (Add missing read_buf stub for x86_64-unknown-l4re-uclibc)
- #129916 (process.rs: remove "Basic usage" text where not useful)
- #129917 (Fix parsing of beta version in dry-run mode)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
The actual implementation remains in `rustc_mir_dataflow`, but this
commit moves the `MirPass` impl to `rustc_mir_transform` and changes it
to a `MirLint` (fixing a `FIXME` comment).
(I originally tried moving the full implementation from
`rustc_mir_dataflow` but I had some trait problems with `HasMoveData`
and `RustcPeekAt` and `MaybeLiveLocals`. This commit was much smaller
and simpler, but still will allow some follow-up cleanups.)
Add missing read_buf stub for x86_64-unknown-l4re-uclibc
Before this PR, `x check library/std --target x86_64-unknown-l4re-uclibc` will fail with
```
error[E0599]: no method named `read_buf` found for struct `Socket` in the current scope
--> std/src/os/unix/net/stream.rs:598:16
|
598 | self.0.read_buf(buf)
| ^^^^^^^^
|
::: std/src/sys/pal/unix/l4re.rs:23:5
|
23 | pub struct Socket(FileDesc);
| ----------------- method `read_buf` not found for this struct
|
= help: items from traits can only be used if the trait is implemented and in scope
```
This target doesn't have a maintainer to cc.
update `object` dependency to remove duplicate `wasmparser`
``@alexcrichton`` in #129762 you bumped a few wasm-related dependencies and tried to avoid duplicates.
If I understand correctly, `object` 0.36.4 wasn't yet released at the time, and therefore #129762 ended up duplicating `wasmparser`. Now that the release happened, we can remove the duplicate.
r? ``@alexcrichton``
Move the Windows remove_dir_all impl into a module and make it more race resistant
This attempts to make the Windows implementation of `remove_dir_all` easier to understand and work with by separating out different concerns into their own functions. The code is mostly the same as before just moved around. There are some changes to make it more robust against races (e.g. two calls to `remove_dir_all` running concurrently). The module level comment explains the issue.
try-job: x86_64-msvc
try-job: i686-msvc
custom/external clippy support for bootstrapping
Similar to cargo, rustc, and rustfmt, this adds the support of using custom clippy on bootstrap. It’s designed for those who want to test their own clippy builds or avoid downloading the stage0 clippy.
Closes#121518
Fix compile error in solid's remove_dir_all
Before this PR, `x check library/std --target=aarch64-kmc-solid_asp3` will fail with:
```
error[E0382]: use of partially moved value: `result`
--> std/src/sys/pal/solid/fs.rs:544:20
|
541 | if let Err(err) = result
| --- value partially moved here
...
544 | return result;
| ^^^^^^ value used here after partial move
|
= note: partial move occurs because value has type `io::error::Error`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
help: borrow this binding in the pattern to avoid moving the value
|
541 | if let Err(ref err) = result
| +++
```
cc `@kawadakk` I think this will clear up https://solid-rs.github.io/toolstate/ :)
Clarify language around ptrs in slice::raw
More specifically we explicitly mention that the pointer should be non-null as a top level requirement. Nullptrs are always valid for zero sized operations, so just validity (and alignment) does not guarantee non-nullness as implied in the existing docs.
We also explicitly call out ZSTs as an additional example where perhaps unintuitively alignment and non-nullness still have to hold.
Finally we change `data` in the range functions to `start`, which seems like a typo to me.
Touches docs for #89792
r? RalfJung
compiler_fence documentation: emphasize synchronization, not reordering
Our `fence` docs have at some point been update to explain that they are about synchronization, not about "preventing reordering". This updates the `compiler_fence` docs n the same vein, mostly by referring to the `fence` docs.
The old docs make it sound like I can put a compiler_fence in the middle of a bunch of non-atomic operations and that would achieve any kind of guarantee. It does not, atomic operations are still required to do synchronization.
I also slightly tweaked the `fence` docs, to put the synchronization first and the "prevent reordering" second.
Cc `@rust-lang/opsem` `@chorman0773` `@m-ou-se`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/129189
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/54962
