Add negation methods for signed non-zero integers.
Performing negation with defined wrapping semantics (such as `wrapping_neg()`) on a non-zero integer currently requires unpacking to a primitive and re-wrapping. Since negation of non-zero signed integers always produces a non-zero result, it is safe to implement the various `*_neg()` methods for `NonZeroI{N}`.
I'm not sure what to do about the `#[unstable(..., issue = "none")]` here -- should I file a tracking issue, or is that handled by the Rust dev team?
ACP: https://github.com/rust-lang/libs-team/issues/105
Add a niche to `Duration`, unix `SystemTime`, and non-apple `Instant`
As the nanoseconds fields is always between `0` and `(NANOS_PER_SEC - 1)` inclusive, use the `rustc_layout_scalar_valid_range` attributes to create a niche in the nanosecond field of `Duration` and `Timespec` (which is used to implement unix `SystemTime` and non-apple unix `Instant`; windows `Instant` is implemented with `Duration` and therefore will also benefit). This change has the benefit of making `Option<T>` the same size as `T` for the previously mentioned types. Also shrinks the nanoseconds field of `Timespec` to a `u32` as nanoseconds do not need the extra range of an `i64`, shrinking `Timespec` by 4 bytes on 32-bit platforms.
r? ```@joshtriplett```
Make `std::os::fd` public.
`std::os::fd` defines types like `OwnedFd` and `RawFd` and is common
between Unix and non-Unix platforms that share a basic file-descriptor
concept. Rust currently uses this internally to simplify its own code,
but it would be useful for external users in the same way, so make it
public.
This means that `OwnedFd` etc. will all appear in three places, for
example on unix platforms:
- `std::os::fd::OwnedFd`
- `std::os::unix::io::OwnedFd`
- `std::os::unix::prelude::OwnedFd`
r? `````@joshtriplett`````
Add `#[rustc_safe_intrinsic]`
This PR adds the `#[rustc_safe_intrinsic]` attribute as mentionned on Zulip. The goal of this attribute is to avoid keeping a list of symbols as the source for stable intrinsics, and instead rely on an attribute. This is similar to `#[rustc_const_stable]` and `#[rustc_const_unstable]`, which among other things, are used to mark the constness of intrinsic functions.
Suggest unwrapping `???<T>` if a method cannot be found on it but is present on `T`.
This suggests various ways to get inside wrapper types if the method cannot be found on the wrapper type, but is present on the wrappee.
For this PR, those wrapper types include `Localkey`, `MaybeUninit`, `RefCell`, `RwLock` and `Mutex`.
Stabilize bench_black_box
This PR stabilize `feature(bench_black_box)`.
```rust
pub fn black_box<T>(dummy: T) -> T;
```
The FCP was completed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/64102.
`@rustbot` label +T-libs-api -T-libs
Stabilize `#![feature(mixed_integer_ops)]`
Tracked and FCP completed in #87840.
````@rustbot```` label +T-libs-api +S-waiting-on-review +relnotes
r? rust-lang/t-libs-api
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102143 (Recover from struct nested in struct)
- #102178 (bootstrap: the backtrace feature is stable, no need to allow it any more)
- #102197 (Stabilize const `BTree{Map,Set}::new`)
- #102267 (Don't set RUSTC in the bootstrap build script)
- #102270 (Remove benches from `rustc_middle`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Stabilize const `BTree{Map,Set}::new`
The FCP was completed in #71835.
Since `len` and `is_empty` are not const stable yet, this also creates a new feature for them since they previously used the same `const_btree_new` feature.
Constify Default impl's for Arrays and Tuples.
Allows to create arrays and tuples in const Context using the ~const Default implementation of the inner type.
Constify slice.split_at_mut(_unchecked)
Tracking Issue: [Tracking Issue for const_slice_split_at_mut](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101804)
Feature gate: `#![feature(const_slice_split_at_mut)]`
Still requires const_mut_refs to be actually used, but this feature removes the need to manually re implement these functions in a user crate.
Clarify `[T]::select_nth_unstable*` return values
In cases where the nth element is not unique within the slice, it is not
correct to say that the values in the returned triplet include ones for
"all elements" less/greater than that at the given index: indeed one (or
more) such values would then also contain elements equal to that at
the given index.
The text proposed here clarifies exactly what is returned, but in so
doing it is also documenting an implementation detail that previously
wasn't detailed: namely that the returned slices are slices into the
reordered slice. I don't think this can be contentious, because the
lifetimes of those returned slices are bound to that of the original
(now reordered) slice—so there really isn't any other reasonable
implementation that could have this behaviour; but nevertheless it's
probably best if `@rust-lang/libs-api` give it a nod?
Fixes#97982
r? `@m-ou-se`
`@rustbot` label +A-docs +C-bug +T-libs-api -T-libs
Recover error strings on Unix from_lossy_utf8
Some language settings can result in unreliable UTF-8 being produced.
This can result in failing to emit the error string, panicking instead.
from_lossy_utf8 allows us to assume these strings usually will be fine.
This fixes rust-lang#99535.
make Condvar, Mutex, RwLock const constructors work with the `unsupported` impl
applying this patch locally to the `rust-src` component fixes#98378
however, the solution seems wrong to me because PR #97791 didn't add any `rustc_const_stable` attribute to underlying implementations like `std::sys::unix::futex`, so I must be missing something about how const-stability is checked ... maybe the `restricted_std` feature (gate?) has an effect?
fixes#98378fixes#98293 (probably)
Make ZST checks in core/alloc more readable
There's a bunch of these checks because of special handing for ZSTs in various unsafe implementations of stuff.
This lets them be `T::IS_ZST` instead of `mem::size_of::<T>() == 0` every time, making them both more readable and more terse.
*Not* proposed for stabilization. Would be `pub(crate)` except `alloc` wants to use it too.
(And while it doesn't matter now, if we ever get something like #85836 making it a const can help codegen be simpler.)
