add lint against unit tests in doctests
During RustLab, Alice Ryhl brought to my attention that the Andoid team stumbled over the fact that if one attempts to write a unit test within a doctest, it will be summarily ignored. So this lint should help people wondering why their tests won't run.
---
changelog: New lint: [`test_attr_in_doctest`]
[#11872](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11872)
Dispose llvm::TargetMachines prior to llvm::Context being disposed
If the TargetMachine is disposed after the Context is disposed, it can lead to use after frees in some cases.
I've observed this happening occasionally on code compiled for aarch64-pc-windows-msvc using `-Zstack-protector=strong` but other users have reported AVs from host aarch64-pc-windows-msvc compilers as well.
I was not able to extract a self-contained test case yet so there is no accompanying test.
Fixes#118462
rustc_span: Remove unused symbols.
As noted here, there is no guarantee that all pre-interned symbols are used.
b10cfcd65f/compiler/rustc_span/src/symbol.rs (L124-L125)
This was done starting with using ripgrep to search for `sym::whatever`. I removed anything that didn't show up. However this had a huge number of false positives, due to extensive macro use. Then there was a manual phase of adding back all the ones used my macros.
I don't think this was worth my time to do, but it's done now . ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Tweak message on ADT with private fields building
When trying to create an inaccessible ADT due to private fields, handle the case when no fields were passed.
```
error: cannot construct `Foo` with struct literal syntax due to private fields
--> $DIR/issue-76077.rs:8:5
|
LL | foo::Foo {};
| ^^^^^^^^
|
= note: private field `you_cant_use_this_field` that was not provided
```
rustdoc-search: allow spaces around `::` in path query
This restriction made sense back when spaces separated function parameters, but now that they separate path components, there's no real ambiguity any more.
Additionally, the Rust language allows it.
The other two commits are misc code cleanup.
miri: add test checking that aggregate assignments reset memory to uninit
Also, `write_aggregate` is really just a helper for evaluating `Aggregate` rvalues, so it should be in `step.rs`, not `place.rs`. Also factor out `Repeat` rvalues into their own function while we are at it.
r? `@saethlin`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/3195
They're not used in `rustc_session`, and `rustc_metadata` is a more
obvious location.
`MetadataLoader` was originally put into `rustc_session` in #41565 to
avoid a dependency on LLVM, but things have changed a lot since then and
that's no longer relevant, e.g. `rustc_codegen_llvm` depends on
`rustc_metadata`.
Fix `PartialEq` args when `#[const_trait]` is enabled
This is based off of your PR that enforces effects on all methods, so just see the last commits.
r? fee1-dead
Tweak parsing recovery of enums, for exprs and match arm patterns
Tweak recovery of `for (pat in expr) {}` for more accurate spans.
When encountering `match` arm `(pat if expr) => {}`, recover and suggest removing parentheses. Fix#100825.
When encountering malformed enums, try more localized per-variant parse recovery.
Move parser recovery tests to subdirectory.
If the TargetMachine is disposed after the Context is disposed, it can
lead to use after frees in some cases.
I've observed this happening occasionally on code compiled for
aarch64-pc-windows-msvc using `-Zstack-protector=strong` but other users
have reported AVs from host aarch64-pc-windows-msvc compilers as well.
Pass +forced-atomics feature for riscv32{i,im,imc}-unknown-none-elf
As said in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98333#issuecomment-1666375293, `forced-atomics` target feature is also needed to enable atomic load/store on these targets (otherwise, libcalls are generated): https://godbolt.org/z/433qeG7vd
~~This PR is currently marked as a draft because:~~
- ~~`forced-atomics` target feature is currently broken (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114153).~~ EDIT: Fixed
- ~~`forced-atomics` target feature has been added in LLVM 16 (f5ed0cb217), but the current minimum LLVM version [is 15](90f0b24ad3/src/bootstrap/llvm.rs (L557)). In LLVM 15, the atomic load/store of these targets generates libcalls anyway.~~ EDIT: LLVM 15 has been dropped
Depending on the policy on the minimum LLVM version for these targets, this may be blocked until the minimum LLVM version is increased to 16.
r? `@Amanieu`
When encountering a fn call that has a path to another fn being passed
in, where an `Fn` impl is expected, and the arguments differ, suggest
wrapping the argument with a closure with the appropriate arguments.
Fix#11893
Trigerring on expressions returning `()` uses the arguments of the
`map_or_else()` rewrite only for their side effects. This does lead
to code which is harder to read than the original.
