- UPDATE - revert migration of logs
- UPDATE - use derive on LinkRlibError enum
- [Gardening] UPDATE - alphabetically sort fluent_messages
- UPDATE - use PathBuf and unify both AddNativeLibrary to use Display (which is what PathBuf uses when conforming to IntoDiagnosticArg)
- UPDATE - fluent messages sort after rebase
Lint against nested opaque types that don't satisfy associated type bounds
See the test failures for examples of places where this lint would fire.
r? `@oli-obk`
errors: rename `typeck.ftl` to `hir_analysis.ftl`
In #102306, `rustc_typeck` was renamed to `rustc_hir_analysis` but the diagnostic resources were not renamed - which is what this pull request changes.
In #102306, `rustc_typeck` was renamed to `rustc_hir_analysis` but the
diagnostic resources were not renamed - which is what this commit
changes.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Move lint level source explanation to the bottom
So, uhhhhh
r? `@estebank`
## User-facing change
"note: `#[warn(...)]` on by default" and such are moved to the bottom of the diagnostic:
```diff
- = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678>
+ = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
```
Why warning is enabled is the least important thing, so it shouldn't be the first note the user reads, IMO.
## Developer-facing change
`struct_span_lint` and similar methods have a different signature.
Before: `..., impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>)`
After: `..., impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>, impl for<'a, 'b> FnOnce(&'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> &'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>`
The reason for this is that `struct_span_lint` needs to edit the diagnostic _after_ `decorate` closure is called. This also makes lint code a little bit nicer in my opinion.
Another option is to use `impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` altough I don't _really_ see reasons to do `let lint = lint.build(message)` everywhere.
## Subtle problem
By moving the message outside of the closure (that may not be called if the lint is disabled) `format!(...)` is executed earlier, possibly formatting `Ty` which may call a query that trims paths that crashes the compiler if there were no warnings...
I don't think it's that big of a deal, considering that we move from `format!(...)` to `fluent` (which is lazy by-default) anyway, however this required adding a workaround which is unfortunate.
## P.S.
I'm sorry, I do not how to make this PR smaller/easier to review. Changes to the lint API affect SO MUCH 😢
Migrate rustc_codegen_gcc to SessionDiagnostics
As part of #100717 this pr migrates diagnostics to `SessionDiagnostics` for the `rustc_codegen_gcc` crate.
``@rustbot`` label +A-translation
