Instead of loading the Fluent resources for every crate in
`rustc_error_messages`, each crate generates typed identifiers for its
own diagnostics and creates a static which are pulled together in the
`rustc_driver` crate and provided to the diagnostic emitter.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Switching them to `Break(())` and `Continue(())` instead.
libs-api would like to remove these constants, so stop using them in compiler to make the removal PR later smaller.
Convert all the crates that have had their diagnostic migration
completed (except save_analysis because that will be deleted soon and
apfloat because of the licensing problem).
Improve syntax of `newtype_index`
This makes it more like proper Rust and also makes the implementation a lot simpler.
Mostly just turns weird flags in the body into proper attributes.
It should probably also be converted to an attribute macro instead of function-like, but that can be done in a future PR.
Remove the `..` from the body, only a few invocations used it and it's
inconsistent with rust syntax.
Use `;` instead of `,` between consts. As the Rust syntax gods inteded.
This removes the `custom` format functionality as its only user was
trivially migrated to using a normal format.
If a new use case for a custom formatting impl pops up, you can add it
back.
feed resolver_for_lowering instead of storing it in a field
r? `@cjgillot`
opening this as
* a discussion for `no_hash` + `feedable` queries. I think we'll want those, but I don't quite understand why they are rejected beyond a double check of the stable hashes for situations where the query is fed but also read from incremental caches.
* and a discussion on removing all untracked fields from TyCtxt and setting it up so that they are fed queries instead
Manually implement PartialEq for Option<T> and specialize non-nullable types
This PR manually implements `PartialEq` and `StructuralPartialEq` for `Option`, which seems to produce slightly better codegen than the automatically derived implementation.
It also allows specializing on the `core::num::NonZero*` and `core::ptr::NonNull` types, taking advantage of the niche optimization by transmuting the `Option<T>` to `T` to be compared directly, which can be done in just two instructions.
A comparison of the original, new and specialized code generation is available [here](https://godbolt.org/z/dE4jxdYsa).
Change #[suggestion_*] attributes to use style="..."
As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20tool_only_span_suggestion), this changes `#[(multipart_)suggestion_{short,verbose,hidden}(...)]` attributes to plain `#[(multipart_)suggestion(...)]` attributes with a `style = "{short,verbose,hidden}"` parameter.
It also adds a new style, `tool-only`, that corresponds to `tool_only_span_suggestion`/`tool_only_multipart_suggestion` and causes the suggestion to not be shown in human-readable output at all.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit, there's a bit of noise in there.
cc #100717 `@compiler-errors`
r? `@davidtwco`
Track where diagnostics were created.
This implements the `-Ztrack-diagnostics` flag, which uses `#[track_caller]` to track where diagnostics are created. It is meant as a debugging tool much like `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`.
For example, the following code...
```rust
struct A;
struct B;
fn main(){
let _: A = B;
}
```
...now emits the following error message:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src\main.rs:5:16
|
5 | let _: A = B;
| - ^ expected struct `A`, found struct `B`
| |
| expected due to this
-Ztrack-diagnostics: created at compiler\rustc_infer\src\infer\error_reporting\mod.rs:2275:31
```
This allows porting uses of span_suggestions() to diagnostic structs.
Doesn't work for multipart_suggestions() because the rank would be
reversed - the struct would specify multiple spans, each of which has
multiple possible replacements, while multipart_suggestions() creates
multiple possible replacements, each with multiple spans.
Sometimes it is convenient to return a subdiagnostic enum where one or
more of the variants don't add anything to the diagnostic.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Documentation comments shouldn't affect the diagnostic derive in any
way, but explicit support has to be added for ignoring the `doc`
attribute.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
