Change linked tracking issue for more_qualified_paths
This updates the linked tracking issue for the `more_qualified_paths` feature from the implementation PR #80080 to an actual tracking issue #86935.
Remove lints_enabled
r? `@camsteffen`
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7448#issuecomment-876497862
I haven't added a variant with `last_node_with_lint_attrs` yet, since I didn't see a usecase for this. Also this field is not documented, so I'm wondering how it behaves with command line lints and so on.
changelog: none
Fix double warning about illegal floating-point literal pattern
This PR fixes#86600. The problem is that the `ConstToPat` struct contains a field `include_lint_checks`, which determines whether lints should be emitted or not, but this field is currently not obeyed at one point, leading to a warning being emitted more than once. I have fixed this behavior here.
Rename run_lints -> lints_enabled
Just a quick rename of a utilities function. `run_lints` kinda suggested that the lints were run by this function. But the only thing this function does is to check if the lints are enabled in the context of the `hir_id`
changelog: none
Account for capture kind in auto traits migration
Modifies the current auto traits migration for RFC2229 so it takes into account capture kind
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/51
r? `@nikomatsakis`
2229: Reduce the size of closures with `capture_disjoint_fields`
One key observation while going over the closure size profile of rustc
was that we are disjointly capturing one or more fields starting at an
immutable reference.
Disjoint capture over immutable reference doesn't add too much value
because the fields can either be borrowed immutably or copied.
One possible edge case of the optimization is when a fields of a struct
have a longer lifetime than the structure, therefore we can't completely
get rid of all the accesses on top of sharef refs, only the rightmost
one. Here is a possible example:
```rust
struct MyStruct<'a> {
a: &'static A,
b: B,
c: C<'a>,
}
fn foo<'a, 'b>(m: &'a MyStruct<'b>) -> impl FnMut() + 'static {
let c = || drop(&*m.a.field_of_a);
// Here we really do want to capture `*m.a` because that outlives `'static`
// If we capture `m`, then the closure no longer outlives `'static'
// it is constrained to `'a`
}
```
r? `@nikomatsakis`
- Add `:Sized` assertion in interpreter impl
- Use `Scalar::from_bool` instead of `ScalarInt: From<bool>`
- Remove unneeded comparison in intrinsic typeck
- Make this UB to call with undef, not just return undef in that case
