According to the LLVM reference:
> A value of 0 or an omitted align argument means that the operation has
the ABI alignment for the target.
So loads/stores of fields of packed structs need to have their align set
to 1. Implement that by tracking the alignment of `LvalueRef`s.
Fixes#39376.
Currently attributes are only shown for structs, unions and enums but
they should be shown for all items. For example it is useful to know if a
function is `#[no_mangle]`.
Display correct filename with --test option
Fixes#39592.
With the current files:
```rust
pub mod foo;
/// This is a Foo;
///
/// ```
/// println!("baaaaaar");
/// ```
pub struct Foo;
/// This is a Bar;
///
/// ```
/// println!("fooooo");
/// ```
pub struct Bar;
```
```rust
// note the whitespaces
/// ```
/// println!("foo");
/// ```
pub fn foo() {}
```
It displays:
```
./build/x86_64-apple-darwin/stage1/bin/rustdoc --test test.rs
running 3 tests
test test.rs - line 13 ... ok
test test.rs - line 5 ... ok
test foo.rs - line 2 ... ok
test result: ok. 3 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured
```
```
` ``
println!("lol");
` ``
asdjnfasd
asd
```
It displays:
```
./build/x86_64-apple-darwin/stage1/bin/rustdoc --test foo.md
running 1 test
test <input> - line 3 ... ok
test result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured
```
r? @alexcrichton
A few documentation improvements for `syntax::print::pp`
* Moved algorithm explanation to module docs
* Added ``` before and after the examples
* Explanation of the `rbox`, `ibox` and `cbox` names
* Added docs about the breaking types to `Breaks`
make Child::try_wait return io::Result<Option<ExitStatus>>
This is much nicer for callers who want to short-circuit real I/O errors
with `?`, because they can write this
if let Some(status) = foo.try_wait()? {
...
} else {
...
}
instead of this
match foo.try_wait() {
Ok(status) => {
...
}
Err(err) if err.kind() == io::ErrorKind::WouldBlock => {
...
}
Err(err) => return Err(err),
}
The original design of `try_wait` was patterned after the `Read` and
`Write` traits, which support both blocking and non-blocking
implementations in a single API. But since `try_wait` is never blocking,
it makes sense to optimize for the non-blocking case.
Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/38903
This way we can call `cmp` instead of `partial_cmp` in the loop,
removing some burden of optimizing `Option`s away from the compiler.
PR #39538 introduced a regression where sorting slices suddenly became
slower, since `slice1.lt(slice2)` was much slower than
`slice1.cmp(slice2) == Less`. This problem is now fixed.
To verify, I benchmarked this simple program:
```rust
fn main() {
let mut v = (0..2_000_000).map(|x| x * x * x * 18913515181).map(|x| vec![x, x ^ 3137831591]).collect::<Vec<_>>();
v.sort();
}
```
Before this PR, it would take 0.95 sec, and now it takes 0.58 sec.
I also tried changing the `is_less` lambda to use `cmp` and
`partial_cmp`. Now all three versions (`lt`, `cmp`, `partial_cmp`) are
equally performant for sorting slices - all of them take 0.58 sec on the
benchmark.
Change deprecation warning to indicate custom derive support was removed
I'm very new to Rust and the message was confusing to me (using nightly and not really sure if I was > 1.15 or not).
Fix short hand struct doc
Don't want to discredit @hngiang effort on this issue.
I just want to lend a hand to fix this issue #38830, it is a very nice feature and is seemingly completed.
Fixes#39096
r? @steveklabnik
Delete the makefile build system
This PR deletes the makefile build system in favor of the rustbuild build system. The beta has now been branched so 1.16 will continue to be buildable from the makefiles, but going forward 1.17 will only be buildable with rustbuild.
Rustbuild has been the default build system [since 1.15.0](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/37817) and the makefiles were [proposed for deletion](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/proposal-for-promoting-rustbuild-to-official-status/4368) at this time back in November of last year.
And now with the deletion of these makefiles we can start getting those sweet sweet improvements of using crates.io crates in the compiler!
Add support for test suites emulated in QEMU
This commit adds support to the build system to execute test suites that cannot
run natively but can instead run inside of a QEMU emulator. A proof-of-concept
builder was added for the `arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf` target to show off how
this might work.
In general the architecture is to have a server running inside of the emulator
which a local client connects to. The protocol between the server/client
supports compiling tests on the host and running them on the target inside the
emulator.
Closes#33114
A few ergonomic From impls for SocketAddr/IpAddr
My main motivation is removing things like this: `"127.0.0.1:3000".parse().unwrap()`. Instead, this now works: `SocketAddr::from(([127, 0, 0, 1], 3000))` or even `([127, 0, 0, 1], 3000).into())` when passing to a function.
Improve error message for uninferrable types #38812
Hello,
I tried to improve the error message for uninferrable types. The error code is `E0282`.
```rust
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> /home/cengizIO/issue38812.rs:2:11
|
2 | let x = vec![];
| - ^^^^^^ cannot infer type for `T`
| |
| consider giving `x` a type
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
```
and
```rust
error[E0282]: type annotations needed
--> /home/cengizIO/issue38812.rs:2:15
|
2 | let (x,) = (vec![],);
| ---- ^^^^^^ cannot infer type for `T`
| |
| consider giving a type to pattern
|
= note: this error originates in a macro outside of the current crate
```
Rust compiler now tries to find uninferred `local`s with type `_` and adds them into the error message.
I'm probably wrong on wording that I used. Please feel free to suggest better alternatives.
Thanks @nikomatsakis for mentoring 🍺
Any comments/feedback is more than welcome!
Thank you
Ipv6Addr <-> u128
Because we have `u128` now, it makes sense to add a conversion between `Ipv6Addr` and `u128` in addition to the existing one between `Ipv4Addr` and `u32`.
This shouldn't violate the existing feature gate on `u128` because you can't use the type without the feature gate, but if i have to add something, I can.
