Fixes#81007
Previously, we would fail to collect tokens in the proper place when
only builtin attributes were present. As a result, we would end up with
attribute tokens in the collected `TokenStream`, leading to duplication
when we attempted to prepend the attributes from the AST node.
We now explicitly track when token collection must be performed due to
nomterminal parsing.
Fix path_to_res for enum inherent items
changelog: none
I tried to add `Option::is_some` to the paths but got a false positive from the invalid paths lint. Turns out the `path_to_res` function does not find inherent impls for enums. I fixed this and took the liberty to do some additional cleanup in the method.
Add new lint `upper_case_acronyms`
Close#1335
I need some reviews on the English sentences because I feel they're messed up. ;)
changelog: Add new lint `upper_case_acronyms`
size_of_in_element_count: Disable lint on division by byte-size
Fixes#6511
It is fairly common to divide some length in bytes by the byte-size of a single element before creating a `from_raw_parts` slice or similar operation. This lint would erroneously disallow such expressions.
Just in case, instead of simply disabling this lint in the RHS of a division, keep track of the inversion and enable it again on recursive division.
---
changelog: Do not trigger size_of_in_element_count when dividing by element size
It is fairly common to divide some length in bytes by the byte-size of a
single element before creating a `from_raw_parts` slice or similar
operation. This lint would erroneously disallow such expressions.
Just in case, instead of simply disabling this lint in the RHS of a
division, keep track of the inversion and enable it again on recursive
division.
An upcoming test case for new expresssion variants make the stderr file
go over 200 lines. Split this test case in two to have a clear
distinction between checking whether the lint is still applying on
all the functions with member counts as argument, versus validating
various member-count expressions that may or may not be invalid.
New Lint: inspect_then_for_each
**Work In Progress**
This PR addresses [Issue 5209](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5209) and adds a new lint called `inspect_then_for_each`.
Current seek some guidance.
If you added a new lint, here's a checklist for things that will be
checked during review or continuous integration.
- \[x] Followed [lint naming conventions][lint_naming]
- \[x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- \[x] `cargo test` passes locally
- \[x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- \[x] Added lint documentation
- \[x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
[lint_naming]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0344-conventions-galore.html#lints
---
changelog: Add [`inspect_for_each`] lint for the use of `inspect().for_each()` on `Iterators`.
Add a note to `as_conversions`
I have seen a couple of examples where there are some misunderstandings of `as_conversions` ([1](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/5890#issuecomment-671852546), [2](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6116#issuecomment-704251710) and [3](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/6428)). This PR adds the note that explains its purpose and relationship with other `as` related casts. Open question: should I list every related lints for discoverbility, or just suggest how to find these? I chose the former because there's no way to list only and all `as` related lints (e.g. on All the Clippt Lints, 'cast' includes some noises, but `cast_` excludes some) even though I cannot guarantee the list will be updated to include future changes.
---
changelog: Add a note to the document of `as_conversions`
- Don't add backticks for the reason a lint was removed. This is almost
never a code block, and when it is the backticks should be in the reason
itself.
- Don't assume clippy is the only tool that needs to be checked for
backwards compatibility
New lint: redundant_slicing
changelog: Added lint: `redundant_slicing`
fixes#6519
This will trigger on any type which implements `Index<RangeFull>` that returns the input type. This would be a false positive if the implementation does something other than return itself, but I'm not sure why you would ever want to do that.
Fix the ICE 6539
Fixes#6539
It happened because `zero_sized_map_values` used `layout_of` with types from type aliases, which is essentially the same as the ICE 4968.
---
changelog: Fix an ICE in `zero_sized_map_values`
Fix FP with empty return for `needless_return` lint
This fixes a false positive in `needless_return` lint, when triggered in a closure using `return` statement without value.
Fixes: #6501
changelog: none
Case sensitive file extensions
Closes#6425
Looks for ends_with methods calls with case sensitive extension comparisons.
changelog: Add new lint that warns about case-sensitive file extension comparisons.
