Un-XFAIL, and just comment out and add a FIXME to the two cases that fail on
linux.
Closes#577. This still doesn't compare <, >, etc for channels, ports and
tasks, but since they use pointer equality, that's a bit difficult to set up.
This is the new way to refer to tasks in rust-land. Currently all they
do is serve as a key to look up the old rust_task structure. Ideally
they won't be ref counted, but baby steps.
typeck::check_fn had an exception for the case where the tail expr
was compatible with type nil -- in that case, it doesn't unify the
tail expr's type with the enclosing function's result type. This
seems wrong to me. There are several test cases in Issue #719
that illustrate why. If the tail expr has type T, for some type
variable T that isn't resolved when this check happens, then T
never gets unified with anything, which is incorrect -- T should
be unified with the result type of the enclosing function. (The
bug was occurring because an unconstrained type variable is
compatible with type nil.)
Instead, I removed the check for type nil and added a check that
the function isn't an iterator -- if it's an iterator, I don't
check the tail expr's type against the function result type,
as that wouldn't make sense.
However, this broke two test cases, and after discussion with
brson, I understood that the purpose of the check was to allow
semicolons to be omitted in some cases. The whole thing seems
rather ad hoc. But I came up with a hacky compromise solution:
instead of checking whether the tailexpr type is *compatible*
with nil, we now just check whether it *is* nil. This also
necessitates calling resolve_type_vars_if_possible before
the check happens, which worries me. But, this fixes the bug
from Issue #719 without requiring changes to any test cases.
Closes#719 but I didn't try every variation -- so reopen the bug
if one of the variations still doesn't work.
Return the result of the discriminant from trans_alt,
rather than nil, in the _|_ case. This was breaking the
enclosed test case (alt-bot-2) when optimization was disabled.
Closes#769
While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any
of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody
should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
But don't actually generate code that does the operation. That means
hoisting the check I added in my last commit from trans_compare
up into trans_eager_binop (don't generate any code if one operand
has type _|_ ).
Closes#777
This was at least partially responsible for Issue 777.
The only solution I can think of is for trans to just not generate
code for a comparison if one or both sides has type _|_. Since
that means evaluating that subexpression diverges, it should be ok
to never do the comparison. Actually generating code for the
comparison would trip an LLVM assertion failure.
