Fix problems with backtraces in two ui tests.
`default-backtrace-ice.rs` started started failing for me recently,
because on my Ubuntu 23.04 system there are 100 stack frames, and the
current stack filtering pattern doesn't match on a stack frame with a
three digit number.
`issue-86800.rs` can also be improved, backtrace-wise.
r? `@Nilstrieb`
avoid duplicating TLS state between test std and realstd
This basically re-lands https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100201 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106638, which got reverted by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/110861. This works around 2 Miri limitations:
- Miri doesn't support the magic linker section that our Windows TLS support relies on, and instead knows where in std to find the symbol that stores the thread callback.
- For macOS, Miri only supports at most one destructor to be registered per thread.
The 2nd would not be very hard to fix (though the intended destructor order is unclear); the first would be a lot of work to fix. Neither of these is a problem for regular Rust code, but in the std test suite we have essentially 2 copies of the std code and then these both become issues. To avoid that we have the std test crate import the TLS code from the real std instead of having its own copy.
r? ``````@m-ou-se``````
This test is supposed to ensure that full backtraces are used for ICEs.
But it doesn't actually do that -- the filtering done cannot distinguish
between a full backtrace versus a short backtrace.
So this commit changes the filtering to preserve the existence of
`__rust_{begin,end}_short_backtrace` markers, which only appear in full
backtraces. This change means the test now tests what it is supposed to
test.
Also, the existing filtering included a rule that excluded any line
starting with two spaces. This was too strong because it filtered out
some parts of the error message. (This was not a showstopper). It was
also not strong enough because it didn't work with three digit stack
frame numbers, which just started seeing after upgrading my Ubuntu
distro to 23.04 machine (this *was* a showstopper).
So the commit replaces that rule with two more precise rules, one for
lines with stack frame numbers, and one for "at ..." lines.
Because it then just has to be filtered out.
This change makes this test more like these other tests:
- tests/ui/treat-err-as-bug/err.rs
- tests/ui/treat-err-as-bug/delay_span_bug.rs
- tests/ui/mir/validate/storage-live.rs
- tests/ui/associated-inherent-types/bugs/ice-substitution.rs
- tests/ui/layout/valid_range_oob.rs
try to downgrade Arc -> Lrc -> Rc -> no-Rc in few places
Expecting this be not slower on non-parallel compiler and probably faster on parallel (checked that this PR builds on it).
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #108865 (Add a `sysroot` crate to represent the standard library crates)
- #110651 (libtest: include test output in junit xml reports)
- #110826 (Make PlaceMention a non-mutating use.)
- #110982 (Do not recurse into const generic args when resolving self lifetime elision.)
- #111009 (Add `ascii::Char` (ACP#179))
- #111100 (check array type of repeat exprs is wf)
- #111186 (Add `is_positive` method for signed non-zero integers.)
- #111201 (bootstrap: add .gitmodules to the sources)
Failed merges:
- #110954 (Reject borrows of projections in ConstProp.)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
check array type of repeat exprs is wf
Fixes#111091
Also makes sure that we actually renumber regions in the length of repeat exprs which we previously weren't doing and would cause ICEs in `adt_const_params` + `generic_const_exprs` from attempting to prove the wf goals when the length was an unevaluated constant with `'erased` in the `ty` field of `Const`
The duplicate errors are caused by the fact that `const_arg_to_const`/`array_len_to_const` in `FnCtxt` adds a `WellFormed` goal for the created `Const` which is also checked by the added `WellFormed(array_ty)`. I don't want to change this to just emit a `T: Sized` goal for the element type since that would ignore `ConstArgHasType` wf requirements and generally uncomfortable with the idea of trying to sync up `wf::obligations` for arrays and the code in hir typeck for repeat exprs.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Add a `sysroot` crate to represent the standard library crates
This adds a dummy crate named `sysroot` to represent the standard library target instead of using the `test` crate. This allows the removal of `proc_macro` as a dependency of `test` allowing these 2 crates to build in parallel saving around 9 seconds locally.
correctly recurse when expanding anon consts
recursing with `super_fold_with` is wrong in case `bac` is itself normalizable, the test that was supposed to test for this being wrong did not actually test for this in reality because of the usage of `{ (N) }` instead of `{{ N }}`. The former resulting in a simple `ConstKind::Param` instead of `ConstKind::Unevaluated`. Tbh generally this test seems very brittle and it will be a lot easier to test once we have normalization of assoc consts since then we can just test that `T::ASSOC` normalizes to some `U::OTHER` which normalizes to some third thing.
r? `@compiler-errors`
Don't suffix `RibKind` variants
This PR
- Removes `use RibKind::*`
- Renames `RibKind::{SomethingRibKind => Something}`
It seems unnecessary to have "RibKind" in the end of all variants, if we can just use it as a normal enum. Additionally previously it was weird that `MacroDefinition` is the only unsuffixed variant.
Encode def span for foreign return-position `impl Trait` in trait
Fixes#111031, yet another def-span encoding issue :/
Includes a smaller repro than the issue, but I can confirm it ICEs:
```
query stack during panic:
#0 [def_span] looking up span for `rpitit::Foo::bar::{opaque#0}`
#1 [object_safety_violations] determining object safety of trait `rpitit::Foo`
#2 [check_is_object_safe] checking if trait `rpitit::Foo` is object safe
#3 [typeck] type-checking `main`
#4 [used_trait_imports] finding used_trait_imports `main`
#5 [analysis] running analysis passes on this crate
```
Luckily since this only affects nightly, this desn't need to be backported.
Explicitly reject negative and reservation drop impls
Fixes#110858
It doesn't really make sense for a type to have a `!Drop` impl. Or at least, I don't want us to implicitly assign a meaning to it by the way the compiler *currently* handles it (incompletely), and rather I would like to see a PR (or an RFC...) assign a meaning to `!Drop` if we actually wanted one for it.
