Patrick Walton
c3694d732e
test: De-@mut the test suite
2014-01-03 14:02:01 -08:00
Daniel Micay
142672dca4
register snapshots
2013-10-23 18:06:12 -04:00
Daniel Micay
4e161a4d40
switch Drop to &mut self
2013-09-16 22:19:23 -04:00
Luqman Aden
ca2966c6d0
Change finalize -> drop.
2013-06-25 21:14:39 -04:00
Niko Matsakis
a896440ca1
new borrow checker (mass squash)
2013-04-30 06:59:32 -04:00
Patrick Walton
1e91595520
librustc: Remove fail_unless!
2013-03-29 16:39:08 -07:00
Patrick Walton
8b56a8380b
librustc: Modify all code to use new lifetime binder syntax
2013-03-26 21:30:17 -07:00
Patrick Walton
66770d20b3
test: Add lifetime binders and new-style lifetime parameters to the test suite
2013-03-22 22:24:36 -07:00
Patrick Walton
d4fee24c7c
librustc: Forbid destructors from being attached to any structs that might contain non-Owned fields. r=nmatsakis
2013-03-21 17:31:34 -07:00
Patrick Walton
d7e74b5e91
librustc: Convert all uses of assert over to fail_unless!
2013-03-07 22:37:57 -08:00
Niko Matsakis
3168fe06ff
Add manual &self/ and &static/ and /&self declarations that
...
are currently inferred. New rules are coming that will require
them to be explicit. All add some explicit self declarations.
2013-03-06 15:12:57 -05:00
Patrick Walton
9143688197
librustc: Replace impl Type : Trait with impl Trait for Type. rs=implflipping
2013-02-14 14:44:12 -08:00
Graydon Hoare
89c8ef792f
check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree
2013-02-01 19:43:17 -08:00
Graydon Hoare
d1affff623
Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup.
2012-12-10 17:32:58 -08:00
Patrick Walton
9e1c9be16f
librustc: Make the Drop trait use explicit self
2012-11-29 11:06:15 -08:00
Ben Striegel
f4a5a76aa4
Convert the test suite to use the Drop trait
2012-11-14 19:26:37 -08:00
Brian Anderson
2572e80355
Remove 'let' syntax for struct fields
2012-09-07 14:02:33 -07:00
Brian Anderson
b4e547d71a
Remove struct ctors
2012-09-06 10:52:26 -07:00
Brian Anderson
3ab4b014cf
Remove the class keyword
2012-08-17 10:13:45 -07:00
Tim Chevalier
febd7ee239
Make let _ = e; have the same semantics as e;
...
The first case was getting treated like a variable binding, meaning that
if e had a destructor, it wouldn't run until the end of the enclosing scope.
To me it seems less confusing for let _ = e; and e; to work exactly the same
way, so now, the destructor for e runs immediately in both cases.
2012-08-08 15:37:45 -07:00
