tag/niche terminology cleanup
The term "discriminant" was used in two ways throughout the compiler:
* every enum variant has a corresponding discriminant, that can be given explicitly with `Variant = N`.
* that discriminant is then encoded in memory to store which variant is active -- but this encoded form of the discriminant was also often called "discriminant", even though it is conceptually quite different (e.g., it can be smaller in size, or even use niche-filling).
After discussion with @eddyb, this renames the second term to "tag". The way the tag is encoded can be either `TagEncoding::Direct` (formerly `DiscriminantKind::Tag`) or `TagEncoding::Niche` (formerly `DiscrimianntKind::Niche`).
This finally resolves some long-standing confusion I had about the handling of variant indices and discriminants, which surfaced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72419.
(There is also a `DiscriminantKind` type in libcore, it remains unaffected. I think this corresponds to the discriminant, not the tag, so that seems all right.)
r? @eddyb
The error message is sub-par, but fixing that requries moving ScalarMaybeUndef
to librustc which would conflict badly with another PR that is in flight.
During the sanity check, we keep track of the path we are below in a `Vec`. We
avoid cloning that `Vec` unless we hit a pointer indirection. The `String`
representation is only computed when validation actually fails.
