* Remove public reexports, as a part of #19253
* Rename getopts::Fail_ to getopts::Fail
* Didn't see a reason for the suffixed '_'
* Removed getopts::FailType
* Looked like it was only beings used for tests; refactored the tests
to stop requiring it
* A few other non-breaking trivial refactoring changes
[breaking-change]
The "Returning Pointers" section of the pointers guide broke from the convention of putting code between backticks. This PR fixes that. There's also a little trailing whitespace I took care of.
This fixes a long-time irritant of mine. Inserting tabs causes M-x next-error to not work in emacs and seems to serve relatively little purpose in improving overall readability.
r? @brson
Implements RFC 438.
Fixes#19092.
This is a [breaking-change]: change types like `&Foo+Send` or `&'a mut Foo+'a` to `&(Foo+Send)` and `&'a mut (Foo+'a)`, respectively.
r? @brson
TrieSet doesn't yet have union, intersection, difference, and symmetric difference functions implemented. Luckily, TrieSet is largely similar to TreeSet, so I was able to reference the implementations of these functions in the latter, and adapt them as necessary to make them work for TrieSet.
One thing that I thought was interesting is that the Iterator yielded by `iter()` for TrieSet iterates over the set's values directly rather than references to the values (whereas I think in most cases I see the Iterator given by `iter()` iterating over immutable references), so for consistency within TrieSet's interface, all of these Iterators also iterate over the values directly. Let me know if all of these should be instead iterating over references.
At the same time remove the `pub use` of the variants in favor of accessing
through the enum type itself. This is a breaking change as the `Found` and
`NotFound` variants must now be imported through `BinarySearchResult` instead of
just `std::slice`.
[breaking-change]
Closes#19271
I stumbled across this today, and it's not really working. It's been around for a very, very long time, and seems to be based on stuff we don't even have anymore.
I asked in `#rust-internals`, and @cmr said we should just kill it, so here I am. :) I don't think that anything else uses Java, but maybe I missed something.
And if this _isn't_ what we want, I'm fine with closing too. Just some housekeeping.
All of the enum components had a redundant 'Type' specifier: TypeSymlink, TypeDirectory, TypeFile. This change removes them, replacing them with a namespace: FileType::Symlink, FileType::Directory, and FileType::RegularFile.
RegularFile is used instead of just File, as File by itself could be mistakenly thought of as referring to the struct.
Part of #19253.
...of the type being matched.
This change will result in a better diagnostic for code like the following:
```rust
enum Enum {
Foo,
Bar
}
fn f(x: Enum) {
match x {
Foo => (),
Bar => ()
}
}
```
which would currently simply fail with an unreachable pattern error
on the 2nd arm.
The user is advised to either use a qualified path in the patterns
or import the variants explicitly into the scope.
...of the type being matched.
This change will result in a better diagnostic for code like the following:
```rust
enum Enum {
Foo,
Bar
}
fn f(x: Enum) {
match x {
Foo => (),
Bar => ()
}
}
```
which would currently simply fail with an unreachable pattern error
on the 2nd arm.
The user is advised to either use a qualified path in the patterns
or import the variants explicitly into the scope.
This PR adds the `rust-lldb` script (feel free to bikeshed about the name).
The script will start LLDB and, before doing anything else, load [LLDB type summaries](http://lldb.llvm.org/varformats.html) that will make LLDB print values with Rust syntax. Just use the script like you would normally use LLDB:
```
rust-lldb executable-to-debug --and-any-other-commandline --args
```
The script will just add one additional commandline argument to the LLDB invocation and pass along the rest of the arguments to LLDB after that.
Given the following program...
```rust
fn main() {
let x = Some(1u);
let y = [0, 1, 2i];
let z = (x, y);
println!("{} {} {}", x, y, z);
}
```
...*without* the 'LLDB type summaries', values will be printed something like this...
```
(lldb) p x
(core::option::Option<uint>) $3 = {
= (RUST$ENUM$DISR = Some)
= (RUST$ENUM$DISR = Some, 1)
}
(lldb) p y
(long [3]) $4 = ([0] = 0, [1] = 1, [2] = 2)
(lldb) p z
((core::option::Option<uint>, [int, ..3])) $5 = {
= {
= (RUST$ENUM$DISR = Some)
= (RUST$ENUM$DISR = Some, 1)
}
= ([0] = 0, [1] = 1, [2] = 2)
}
```
...*with* the 'LLDB type summaries', values will be printed like this:
```
(lldb) p x
(core::option::Option<uint>) $0 = Some(1)
(lldb) p y
(long [3]) $1 = [0, 1, 2]
(lldb) p z
((core::option::Option<uint>, [int, ..3])) $2 = (Some(1), [0, 1, 2])
```
The 'LLDB type summaries' used by the script have been in use for a while in the LLDB autotests but I still consider them to be of alpha-version quality. If you see anything weird when you use them, feel free to file an issue.
The script will use whatever Rust "installation" is in PATH, so whichever `rustc` will be called if you type `rustc` into the console, this is the one that the script will ask for the LLDB extension module location. The build system will take care of putting the script and LLDB python module in the right places, whether you want to use the stage1 or stage2 compiler or the one coming with `make install` / `rustup.sh`.
Since I don't have much experience with the build system, Makefiles and shell scripts, please look these changes over carefully.
