- we need to figure out hygiene first
- change the test to check that the prohibition works with a good error
msg
- leaves some comments and debugging code
- leaves some of our supposed fixes
The top level message shouldn't be too long; the
replaced-by-coercion/temporary-variable advice can live in a note. Also,
don't mention type ascription when it's not actually available as a real
thing. (The current state of discussion on the type ascription tracking
issue #23416 makes one rather suspect it will never be a stable thing in
its current form, but that's not for us to adjudicate in this commit.)
While we're here, yank out the differentiating parts of the
numeric/other conditional and only have one codepath emitting the
diagnostic.
Now that `..=` inclusive ranges are stabilized, people probably
shouldn't be using `...` even in patterns, even if it's still legal
there (see #51043). To avoid drawing attention to `...` being a real
thing, let's reword this message to just say "unexpected token" rather
"cannot be used in expressions".
Update rustfmt submodule
The version of rustfmt currently shipped with nightly breaks code that uses `break 'label`. This PR updates the submodule to include the fix (https://github.com/rust-lang-nursery/rustfmt/pull/2774).
Option::get_or_insert(_with): Replace unreachable! with unreachable_unchecked
Optimize codegen for both functions as the None branch is trivially not reachable.
Rename hir::ExprAgain to hir::ExprContinue
The current name is confusing and historical.
I also used this PR to clean up the annoying indentation in `check/mod.rs`. If that's viewed as too tangential a change, I'll split it up, but it seemed reasonable to slip it in to reduce @bors's work. It's easy to compare for the two commits individually.
r? @petrochenkov
This commit expands on a previous commit to build llvm-tools as a rustup
component. It causes the llvm-tools component to be built if the
extended step is active. It also adds llvm-tools to the build manifest
so rustup can find it.
async/await
This PR implements `async`/`await` syntax for `async fn` in Rust 2015 and `async` closures and `async` blocks in Rust 2018 (tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/50547). Limitations: non-`move` async closures with arguments are currently not supported, nor are `async fn` with multiple different input lifetimes. These limitations are not fundamental and will be removed in the future, however I'd like to go ahead and get this PR merged so we can start experimenting with this in combination with futures 0.3.
Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51414.
cc @petrochenkov for parsing changes.
r? @eddyb
