Commit Graph

711 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nilstrieb
c65ebae221
Migrate all diagnostics 2022-10-23 10:09:44 +02:00
Dylan DPC
e11511dfa6
Rollup merge of #103051 - davidtwco:translation-tidying-up, r=compiler-errors
translation: doc comments with derives, subdiagnostic-less enum variants, more derive use

- Adds support for `doc` attributes in the diagnostic derives so that documentation comments don't result in the derive failing.
- Adds support for enum variants in the subdiagnostic derive to not actually correspond to an addition to a diagnostic.
- Made use of the derive in more places in the `rustc_ast_lowering`, `rustc_ast_passes`, `rustc_lint`, `rustc_session`, `rustc_infer` - taking advantage of recent additions like eager subdiagnostics, multispan suggestions, etc.

cc #100717
2022-10-21 17:29:58 +05:30
Santiago Pastorino
49ce8a22b0
Do anonymous lifetimes remapping correctly for nested rpits 2022-10-19 16:49:39 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
fb5475887f
Extract orig_opt_local_def_id as a function 2022-10-19 16:49:39 -03:00
Yuki Okushi
6e7d206a7b
Rollup merge of #103168 - Amanieu:stable_asm_sym, r=davidtwco
Stabilize asm_sym

Tracking issue #93333

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1270
2022-10-18 21:21:32 +09:00
Amanieu d'Antras
430bd6200d Stabilize asm_sym 2022-10-17 22:38:37 +01:00
David Wood
2a4b587a68 ast_lowering: use derive more
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
2022-10-17 09:54:24 +01:00
Dylan DPC
b79ad57ad7
Rollup merge of #102998 - nathanwhit:let-chains-drop-order, r=eholk
Drop temporaries created in a condition, even if it's a let chain

Fixes #100513.

During the lowering from AST to HIR we wrap expressions acting as conditions in a `DropTemps` expression so that any temporaries created in the condition are dropped after the condition is executed. Effectively this means we transform

```rust
if Some(1).is_some() { .. }
```

into (roughly)

```rust
if { let _t = Some(1).is_some(); _t } { .. }
```

so that if we create any temporaries, they're lifted into the new scope surrounding the condition, so for example something along the lines of

```rust
if { let temp = Some(1); let _t = temp.is_some(); _t }.
```

Before this PR, if the condition contained any let expressions we would not introduce that new scope, instead leaving the condition alone. This meant that in a let-chain like

```rust
if get_drop("first").is_some() && let None = get_drop("last") {
        println!("second");
} else { .. }
```

the temporary created for `get_drop("first")` would be lifted into the _surrounding block_, which caused it to be dropped after the execution of the entire `if` expression.

After this PR, we wrap everything but the `let` expression in terminating scopes. The upside to this solution is that it's minimally invasive, but the downside is that in the worst case, an expression with `let` exprs interspersed like

```rust
if get_drop("first").is_some()
    && let Some(_a) = get_drop("fifth")
    && get_drop("second").is_some()
    && let Some(_b) = get_drop("fourth") { .. }
```

gets _multiple_ new scopes, roughly

```rust
if { let _t = get_drop("first").is_some(); _t }
    && let Some(_a) = get_drop("fifth")
    && { let _t = get_drop("second").is_some(); _t }
    && let Some(_b) = get_drop("fourth") { .. }
```

so instead of all of the temporaries being dropped at the end of the entire condition, they will be dropped right after they're evaluated (before the subsequent `let` expr). So while I'd say the drop behavior around let-chains is _less_ surprising after this PR, it still might not exactly match what people might expect.

For tests, I've just extended the drop order tests added in #100526. I'm not sure if that's the best way to go about it, though, so suggestions are welcome.
2022-10-15 15:45:32 +05:30
bors
46244f335b Auto merge of #99292 - Aaron1011:stability-use-tree, r=cjgillot
Correctly handle path stability for 'use tree' items

PR #95956 started checking the stability of path segments.
However, this was not applied to 'use tree' items
(e.g. 'use some::path::{ItemOne, ItemTwo}') due to the way
that we desugar these items in HIR lowering.

This PR modifies 'use tree' lowering to preserve resolution
information, which is needed by stability checking.
2022-10-15 04:27:15 +00:00
Nathan Whitaker
709a08ade6 Lower condition directly from AST to HIR 2022-10-13 18:20:39 -07:00
Nathan Whitaker
ad8b242724 Let chains should still drop temporaries
by the end of the condition's execution
2022-10-12 17:57:32 -07:00
Dylan DPC
dc9f6f3243
Rollup merge of #102623 - davidtwco:translation-eager, r=compiler-errors
translation: eager translation

Part of #100717. See [Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20lists!/near/295010720) for additional context.

- **Store diagnostic arguments in a `HashMap`**: Eager translation will enable subdiagnostics to be translated multiple times with different arguments - this requires the ability to replace the value of one argument with a new value, which is better suited to a `HashMap` than the previous storage, a `Vec`.
- **Add `AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic_with`**: `AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic_with` is similar to the previous `AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic` but takes a function that can be used by the caller to modify diagnostic messages originating from the subdiagnostic (such as performing translation eagerly). `add_to_diagnostic` now just calls `add_to_diagnostic_with` with an empty closure.
- **Add `DiagnosticMessage::Eager`**: Add variant of `DiagnosticMessage` for eagerly translated messages
(messages in the target language which don't need translated by the emitter during emission). Also adds `eager_subdiagnostic` function which is intended to be invoked by the diagnostic derive for subdiagnostic fields which are marked as needing eager translation.
- **Support `#[subdiagnostic(eager)]`**: Add support for `eager` argument to the `subdiagnostic` attribute which generates a call to `eager_subdiagnostic`.
- **Finish migrating `rustc_query_system`**: Using eager translation, migrate the remaining repeated cycle stack diagnostic.
- **Split formatting initialization and use in diagnostic derives**: Diagnostic derives have previously had to take special care when ordering the generated code so that fields were not used after a move.

  This is unlikely for most fields because a field is either annotated with a subdiagnostic attribute and is thus likely a `Span` and copiable, or is a argument, in which case it is only used once by `set_arg`
anyway.

  However, format strings for code in suggestions can result in fields being used after being moved if not ordered carefully. As a result, the derive currently puts `set_arg` calls last (just before emission), such as:

      let diag = { /* create diagnostic */ };

      diag.span_suggestion_with_style(
          span,
          fluent::crate::slug,
          format!("{}", __binding_0),
          Applicability::Unknown,
          SuggestionStyle::ShowAlways
      );
      /* + other subdiagnostic additions */

      diag.set_arg("foo", __binding_0);
      /* + other `set_arg` calls */

      diag.emit();

  For eager translation, this doesn't work, as the message being translated eagerly can assume that all arguments are available - so arguments _must_ be set first.

  Format strings for suggestion code are now separated into two parts - an initialization line that performs the formatting into a variable, and a usage in the subdiagnostic addition.

  By separating these parts, the initialization can happen before arguments are set, preserving the desired order so that code compiles, while still enabling arguments to be set before subdiagnostics are added.

      let diag = { /* create diagnostic */ };

      let __code_0 = format!("{}", __binding_0);
      /* + other formatting */

      diag.set_arg("foo", __binding_0);
      /* + other `set_arg` calls */

      diag.span_suggestion_with_style(
          span,
          fluent::crate::slug,
          __code_0,
          Applicability::Unknown,
          SuggestionStyle::ShowAlways
      );
      /* + other subdiagnostic additions */

      diag.emit();

- **Remove field ordering logic in diagnostic derive:** Following the approach taken in earlier commits to separate formatting initialization from use in the subdiagnostic derive, simplify the diagnostic derive by removing the field-ordering logic that previously solved this problem.

r? ```@compiler-errors```
2022-10-12 22:13:23 +05:30
Vadim Petrochenkov
1a8f177772 rustc_hir: Less error-prone methods for accessing PartialRes resolution 2022-10-11 09:04:52 +04:00
David Wood
b4ac26289f errors: AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic_with
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic_with` is similar to the previous
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic` but takes a function that can be
used by the caller to modify diagnostic messages originating from the
subdiagnostic (such as performing translation eagerly).

`add_to_diagnostic` now just calls `add_to_diagnostic_with` with an
empty closure.

Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
2022-10-10 14:20:16 +01:00
Michael Goulet
d3bd6beb97 Rename AssocItemKind::TyAlias to AssocItemKind::Type 2022-10-10 02:31:37 +00:00
Yuki Okushi
24424d0acb
Rollup merge of #102829 - compiler-errors:rename-impl-item-kind, r=TaKO8Ki
rename `ImplItemKind::TyAlias` to `ImplItemKind::Type`

The naming of this variant seems inconsistent given that this is not really a "type alias", and the associated type variant for `TraitItemKind` is just called `Type`.
2022-10-10 00:09:42 +09:00
Michael Goulet
70f3c79c50 ImplItemKind::TyAlias => ImplItemKind::Type 2022-10-09 07:09:57 +00:00
bors
0152393048 Auto merge of #99324 - reez12g:issue-99144, r=jyn514
Enable doctests in compiler/ crates

Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99144
2022-10-06 03:01:57 +00:00
reez12g
488eb4209e Temporarily reinstate doctest=false 2022-10-05 09:53:49 +09:00
Santiago Pastorino
b2bef02bcd
create def ids for impl traits during ast lowering 2022-09-30 15:12:01 -03:00
reez12g
a1999b76aa Mark ignore(illustrative) on docs in compiler/rustc_ast_lowering/src/expr.rs 2022-09-29 16:49:13 +09:00
reez12g
9a4c5abe45 Remove from compiler/ crates 2022-09-29 16:49:04 +09:00
Camille GILLOT
337a73da6e Do not overwrite binders for another HirId. 2022-09-27 18:58:37 +02:00
Pietro Albini
3975d55d98
remove cfg(bootstrap) 2022-09-26 10:14:45 +02:00
Michael Goulet
e99f6fee44 Only lower async fn body if it actually has a body 2022-09-25 23:03:15 +00:00
Takayuki Maeda
8fe936099a separate definitions and HIR owners
fix a ui test

use `into`

fix clippy ui test

fix a run-make-fulldeps test

implement `IntoQueryParam<DefId>` for `OwnerId`

use `OwnerId` for more queries

change the type of `ParentOwnerIterator::Item` to `(OwnerId, OwnerNode)`
2022-09-24 23:21:19 +09:00
bors
4d44e09cb1 Auto merge of #102165 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-n5oquhe, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100734 (Split out async_fn_in_trait into a separate feature)
 - #101664 (Note if mismatched types have a similar name)
 - #101815 (Migrated the rustc_passes annotation without effect diagnostic infrastructure)
 - #102042 (Distribute rust-docs-json via rustup.)
 - #102066 (rustdoc: remove unnecessary `max-width` on headers)
 - #102095 (Deduplicate two functions that would soon have been three)
 - #102104 (Set 'exec-env:RUST_BACKTRACE=0' in const-eval-select tests)
 - #102112 (Allow full relro on powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-09-23 09:33:23 +00:00
khyperia
9a206a78eb Improve the help message for an invalid calling convention 2022-09-22 22:18:30 +02:00
Dan Johnson
d0a07495be Split out async_fn_in_trait into a separate feature
PR #101224 added support for async fn in trait desuraging behind the
return_position_impl_trait_in_trait feature.

Split this out so that it's behind its own feature gate, since async fn
in trait doesn't need to follow the same stabilization schedule.
2022-09-21 19:26:23 -07:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
e52e2344dc FIX - adopt new Diagnostic naming in newly migrated modules
FIX - ambiguous Diagnostic link in docs

UPDATE - rename diagnostic_items to IntoDiagnostic and AddToDiagnostic

[Gardening] FIX - formatting via `x fmt`

FIX - rebase conflicts. NOTE: Confirm wheather or not we want to handle TargetDataLayoutErrorsWrapper this way

DELETE - unneeded allow attributes in Handler method

FIX - broken test

FIX - Rebase conflict

UPDATE - rename residual _SessionDiagnostic and fix LintDiag link
2022-09-21 11:43:22 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5f91719f75 UPDATE - rename SessionSubdiagnostic macro to Subdiagnostic
Also renames:
- sym::AddSubdiagnostic to sym:: Subdiagnostic
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AddSubdiagnostic" to rustc_diagnostic_item = "Subdiagnostic"
2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
a3396b2070 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler macro to Diagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
191fac6826 UPDATE - rename AddSubdiagnostic trait to AddToDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
19b348fed4 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler trait to IntoDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
Santiago Pastorino
550bd0945f
Simplify rpitit handling on lower_fn_decl 2022-09-19 09:30:39 -03:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687 (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a447 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963c (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d307 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984 (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a2 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea566677 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7e (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3 (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded86 (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b56640106 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c96 (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a84 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603c (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43 (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d40 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
Guillaume Gomez
8ba133fa7b
Rollup merge of #101825 - spastorino:fix-rpit-changes, r=oli-obk
Fix back RPIT changes

r? `@oli-obk`

cc `@compiler-errors`
2022-09-16 13:07:17 +02:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
est31
bca3cf7e86 Stabilize the let_else feature 2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
bors
750bd1a7ff Auto merge of #101313 - SparrowLii:mk_attr_id, r=cjgillot
make `mk_attr_id` part of `ParseSess`

Updates #48685

The current `mk_attr_id` uses the `AtomicU32` type, which is not very efficient and adds a lot of lock contention in a parallel environment.

This PR refers to the task list in #48685, uses `mk_attr_id` as a method of the `AttrIdGenerator` struct, and adds a new field `attr_id_generator` to `ParseSess`.

`AttrIdGenerator` uses the `WorkerLocal`, which has two advantages: 1. `Cell` is more efficient than `AtomicU32`, and does not increase any lock contention. 2. We put the index of the work thread in the first few bits of the generated `AttrId`, so that the `AttrId` generated in different threads can be easily guaranteed to be unique.

cc `@cjgillot`
2022-09-14 20:52:18 +00:00
Santiago Pastorino
45d8049387
Get rid of 'b lifetime in lower_param_bounds_mut 2022-09-14 17:40:51 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
861055094c
Pass ImplTraitContext as &, there's no need for that to be &mut 2022-09-14 17:39:52 -03:00
Santiago Pastorino
669f2d4550
Revert "Rollup merge of #101496 - spastorino:lower_lifetime_binder_api_changes, r=oli-obk"
This reverts commit 953a6b3da7, reversing
changes made to b5ffbd32d4.
2022-09-14 17:26:37 -03:00
bors
a0d1df4a5d Auto merge of #101709 - nnethercote:simplify-visitors-more, r=cjgillot
Simplify visitors more

A successor to #100392.

r? `@cjgillot`
2022-09-14 05:21:14 +00:00
SparrowLii
1a3ecbdb6a make mk_attr_id part of ParseSess 2022-09-14 08:49:10 +08:00
Lukas Markeffsky
2b7fb8d941 Impove diagnostic for .await-ing non-futures 2022-09-12 16:54:25 +02:00
Nicholas Nethercote
925363f13d Remove unused span argument from walk_fn. 2022-09-12 13:24:27 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
6568ef338e Remove path_span argument to the visit_path_segment methods.
The `visit_path_segment` method of both the AST and HIR visitors has a
`path_span` argument that isn't necessary. This commit removes it.

There are two very small and inconsequential functional changes.

- One call to `NodeCollector::insert` now is passed a path segment
  identifier span instead of a full path span. This span is only used in
a panic message printed in the case of an internal compiler bug.

- Likewise, one call to `LifetimeCollectVisitor::record_elided_anchor`
  now uses a path segment identifier span instead of a full path span.
  This span is used to make some `'_` lifetimes.
2022-09-12 13:24:25 +10:00
bors
fa521a4691 Auto merge of #101688 - cjgillot:verify-hir-parent, r=petrochenkov
Assert that HIR nodes are not their own parent.

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101505.
Replaces #101513

r? `@petrochenkov` `@nnethercote`
2022-09-12 00:41:56 +00:00
Camille GILLOT
51f486931f Assert that HIR nodes are not their own parent. 2022-09-11 20:12:51 +02:00