Fix rustc_parse_format precision & width spans
When a `precision`/`width` was `CountIsName - {:name$}` or `CountIs - {:10}` the `precision_span`/`width_span` was set to `None`
For `width` the name span in `CountIsName(_, name_span)` had its `.start` off by one
r? ``@fee1-dead`` / cc ``@PrestonFrom`` since this is similar to #99987
Migrate `rustc_plugin_impl` to `SessionDiagnostic`
Migration of the `rustc_plugin_impl` crate.
~Draft PR because it is blocked on #100694 for `#[fatal(...)]` support~ (this has been merged, and I've changed over to `#[diag(...)]` now too), but I would also like to know if what I did with `LoadPluginError` is okay, because all it does is display the error message from `libloading` ([See conversation on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/147480-t-compiler.2Fwg-diagnostics/topic/.23100717.20diagnostic.20translation/near/294327843)). This crate is apparently for a deprecated feature which is used by servo, so I don't know how much this matters anyway.
InferCtxt tainted_by_errors_flag should be Option<ErrorGuaranteed>
Fixes#100321.
Use Cell<Option<ErrorGuaranteed>> to guarantee that we emit an error when that flag is set.
Do not re-parse function signatures to suggest generics
This PR uses the existing resolution rib infrastructure to channel the correct span information to suggest generic parameters. This allows to avoid re-parsing a function's source code.
Drive-by cleanup: this removes useless `FnItemRibKind` from late resolution ribs. All the use cases are already covered by `ItemRibKind` and `AssocItemRibKind` which have more precise semantics.
Cranelift 0.87 now supports lowering `fma` as a libcall on x86 [0].
With 0.88 enabling the native x86 instruction under the `has_fma` flag.
aarch64 and s390x already support this as a native instruction, so it's
nice that we emit it for those.
We can't lower the SIMD version using the `fma` instruction since the
lowering can fail if the x86 `has_fma` flag is not enabled. Cranelift
doesn't yet know how to fallback for these cases
[0]: 709716bb8e
The indirection is no longer needed since we always link to libgcc
even when the panic_abort runtime is used. Instead we can just call
the libgcc functions directly.
These were previously in the panic_unwind crate with dummy stubs in the
panic_abort crate. However it turns out that this is insufficient: we
still need a proper personality function even with -C panic=abort to
handle the following cases:
1) `extern "C-unwind"` still needs to catch foreign exceptions with -C
panic=abort to turn them into aborts. This requires landing pads and a
personality function.
2) ARM EHABI uses the personality function when creating backtraces.
The dummy personality function in panic_abort was causing backtrace
generation to get stuck in a loop since the personality function is
responsible for advancing the unwind state to the next frame.
Align android `sigaddset` impl with the reference impl from Bionic
In https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100737 I noticed we were treating the sigset_t as an array of bytes, while referencing code from android (ad8dcd6023/libc/include/android/legacy_signal_inlines.h) which treats it as an array of unsigned long.
That said, the behavior difference is so subtle here that it's not hard to see why nobody noticed. This fixes the implementation to be equivalent to the one in bionic.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #100382 (Make the GATS self outlives error take into GATs in the inputs)
- #100565 (Suggest adding a missing semicolon before an item)
- #100641 (Add the armv4t-none-eabi target to the supported_targets)
- #100789 (Use separate infcx to solve obligations during negative coherence)
- #100832 (Some small bootstrap cleanup)
- #100861 (fix ICE with extra-const-ub-checks)
- #100862 (tidy: remove crossbeam-utils)
- #100887 (Refactor part of codegen_call_terminator)
- #100893 (Remove out-of-context comment in `mem::MaybeUninit` documentation)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Remove out-of-context comment in `mem::MaybeUninit` documentation
Reverted the comment to an earlier version to avoid confusion: neither raw pointer assignment nor `ptr::write` is used inside the for loop.
