As an example of what this changes, the following code:
let x: [int ..4];
Currently spits out ‘expected `]`, found `..`’. However, a comma would also be
valid there, as would a number of other tokens. This change adjusts the parser
to produce more accurate errors, so that that example now produces ‘expected one
of `(`, `+`, `,`, `::`, or `]`, found `..`’.
Implements RFC 438.
Fixes#19092.
This is a [breaking-change]: change types like `&Foo+Send` or `&'a mut Foo+'a` to `&(Foo+Send)` and `&'a mut (Foo+'a)`, respectively.
r? @brson
This is an initial pass at stabilizing the `iter` module. The module is
fairly large, but is also pretty polished, so most of the stabilization
leaves things as they are.
Some changes:
* Due to the new object safety rules, various traits needs to be split
into object-safe traits and extension traits. This includes `Iterator`
itself. While splitting up the traits adds some complexity, it will
also increase flexbility: once we have automatic impls of `Trait` for
trait objects over `Trait`, then things like the iterator adapters
will all work with trait objects.
* Iterator adapters that use up the entire iterator now take it by
value, which makes the semantics more clear and helps catch bugs. Due
to the splitting of Iterator, this does not affect trait objects. If
the underlying iterator is still desired for some reason, `by_ref` can
be used. (Note: this change had no fallout in the Rust distro except
for the useless mut lint.)
* In general, extension traits new and old are following an [in-progress
convention](rust-lang/rfcs#445). As such, they
are marked `unstable`.
* As usual, anything involving closures is `unstable` pending unboxed
closures.
* A few of the more esoteric/underdeveloped iterator forms (like
`RandomAccessIterator` and `MutableDoubleEndedIterator`, along with
various unfolds) are left experimental for now.
* The `order` submodule is left `experimental` because it will hopefully
be replaced by generalized comparison traits.
* "Leaf" iterators (like `Repeat` and `Counter`) are uniformly
constructed by free fns at the module level. That's because the types
are not otherwise of any significance (if we had `impl Trait`, you
wouldn't want to define a type at all).
Closes#17701
Due to renamings and splitting of traits, this is a:
[breaking-change]
- Add `IntoCow` trait, and put it in the prelude
- Add `is_owned`/`is_borrowed` methods to `Cow`
- Add `CowString`/`CowVec` type aliases (to `Cow<'_, String, str>`/`Cow<'_, Vec, [T]>` respectively)
- `Cow` implements: `Show`, `Hash`, `[Partial]{Eq,Ord}`
- `impl BorrowFrom<Cow<'a, T, B>> for B`
[breaking-change]s:
- `IntoMaybeOwned` has been removed from the prelude
- libcollections: `SendStr` is now an alias to `CowString<'static>` (it was aliased to `MaybeOwned<'static>`)
- libgraphviz:
- `LabelText` variants now wrap `CowString` instead of `MaybeOwned`
- `Nodes` and `Edges` are now type aliases to `CowVec` (they were aliased to `MaybeOwnedVec`)
- libstd/path: `Display::as_maybe_owned` has been renamed to `Display::as_cow` and now returns a `CowString`
- These functions now accept/return `Cow` instead of `MaybeOwned[Vector]`:
- libregex: `Replacer::reg_replace`
- libcollections: `str::from_utf8_lossy`
- libgraphviz: `Id::new`, `Id::name`, `LabelText::pre_escaped_content`
- libstd: `TaskBuilder::named`
r? @aturon
This commit removes the `std::local_data` module in favor of a new
`std::thread_local` module providing thread local storage. The module provides
two variants of TLS: one which owns its contents and one which is based on
scoped references. Each implementation has pros and cons listed in the
documentation.
Both flavors have accessors through a function called `with` which yield a
reference to a closure provided. Both flavors also panic if a reference cannot
be yielded and provide a function to test whether an access would panic or not.
This is an implementation of [RFC 461][rfc] and full details can be found in
that RFC.
This is a breaking change due to the removal of the `std::local_data` module.
All users can migrate to the new thread local system like so:
thread_local!(static FOO: Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>> = Rc::new(RefCell::new(None)))
The old `local_data` module inherently contained the `Rc<RefCell<Option<T>>>` as
an implementation detail which must now be explicitly stated by users.
[rfc]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/461
[breaking-change]
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19077
I would appreciate any guidance on how to write a test for this. I saw some examples in `test/pretty`, but there are different ways to test... With or without `.pp` files, with a `pp-exact` comment, etc.
This breaks code like
```
let t = (42i, 42i);
... t.0::<int> ...;
```
Change this code to not contain an unused type parameter. For example:
```
let t = (42i, 42i);
... t.0 ...;
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19096
[breaking-change]
r? @aturon
This breaks code like
```
let t = (42i, 42i);
... t.0::<int> ...;
```
Change this code to not contain an unused type parameter. For example:
```
let t = (42i, 42i);
... t.0 ...;
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19096
[breaking-change]
