Fixing bad suggestion for `_` in `const` type when a function #81885Closes#81885
```
error[E0121]: the type placeholder `_` is not allowed within types on item signatures
--> $DIR/typeck_type_placeholder_item_help.rs:13:22
|
LL | const TEST4: fn() -> _ = 42;
| ^
| |
| not allowed in type signatures
| help: use type parameters instead: `T`
```
Do not show the suggestion `help: use type parameters instead: T` when `fn`
Implement the precise analysis pass for lint `disjoint_capture_drop_reorder`
The precision pass for the lint prevents the lint from triggering for a variable (that was previously entirely captured by the closure) if all paths that need Drop starting at root variable have been captured by the closure.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Drop an unnecessary intermediate variable
Neither does it shorten the code nor does it provide a helpful name.
`@rustbot` modify labels +C-cleanup +T-compiler
r? `@varkor`
GAT/const_generics: Allow with_opt_const_param to return GAT param def_id
Fixes#75415Fixes#79666
cc ```@lcnr```
I've absolutely no idea who to r? for this...
Allow casting mut array ref to mut ptr
Allow casting mut array ref to mut ptr
We now allow two new casts:
- mut array reference to mut ptr. Example:
let mut x: [usize; 2] = [0, 0];
let p = &mut x as *mut usize;
We allow casting const array references to const pointers so not
allowing mut references to mut pointers was inconsistent.
- mut array reference to const ptr. Example:
let mut x: [usize; 2] = [0, 0];
let p = &mut x as *const usize;
This was similarly inconsistent as we allow casting mut references to
const pointers.
Existing test 'vector-cast-weirdness' updated to test both cases.
Fixes#24151
Reduce log level used by tracing instrumentation from info to debug
Restore log level to debug to avoid make info log level overly verbose (the uses of instrument attribute modified there, were for the most part a replacement for `debug!`; one use was novel).
We now allow two new casts:
- mut array reference to mut ptr. Example:
let mut x: [usize; 2] = [0, 0];
let p = &mut x as *mut usize;
We allow casting const array references to const pointers so not
allowing mut references to mut pointers was inconsistent.
- mut array reference to const ptr. Example:
let mut x: [usize; 2] = [0, 0];
let p = &mut x as *const usize;
This was similarly inconsistent as we allow casting mut references to
const pointers.
Existing test 'vector-cast-weirdness' updated to test both cases.
Fixes#24151
Rename HIR UnOp variants
This renames the variants in HIR UnOp from
enum UnOp {
UnDeref,
UnNot,
UnNeg,
}
to
enum UnOp {
Deref,
Not,
Neg,
}
Motivations:
- This is more consistent with the rest of the code base where most enum
variants don't have a prefix.
- These variants are never used without the `UnOp` prefix so the extra
`Un` prefix doesn't help with readability. E.g. we don't have any
`UnDeref`s in the code, we only have `UnOp::UnDeref`.
- MIR `UnOp` type variants don't have a prefix so this is more
consistent with MIR types.
- "un" prefix reads like "inverse" or "reverse", so as a beginner in
rustc code base when I see "UnDeref" what comes to my mind is
something like `&*` instead of just `*`.
This renames the variants in HIR UnOp from
enum UnOp {
UnDeref,
UnNot,
UnNeg,
}
to
enum UnOp {
Deref,
Not,
Neg,
}
Motivations:
- This is more consistent with the rest of the code base where most enum
variants don't have a prefix.
- These variants are never used without the `UnOp` prefix so the extra
`Un` prefix doesn't help with readability. E.g. we don't have any
`UnDeref`s in the code, we only have `UnOp::UnDeref`.
- MIR `UnOp` type variants don't have a prefix so this is more
consistent with MIR types.
- "un" prefix reads like "inverse" or "reverse", so as a beginner in
rustc code base when I see "UnDeref" what comes to my mind is
something like "&*" instead of just "*".
Allow Trait inheritance with cycles on associated types take 2
This reverts the revert of #79209 and fixes the ICEs that's occasioned by that PR exposing some problems that are addressed in #80648 and #79811.
For easier review I'd say, check only the last commit, the first one is just a revert of the revert of #79209 which was already approved.
This also could be considered part or the actual fix of #79560 but I guess for that to be closed and fixed completely we would need to land #80648 and #79811 too.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@Aaron1011`
Improve SIMD type element count validation
Resolvesrust-lang/stdsimd#53.
These changes are motivated by `stdsimd` moving in the direction of const generic vectors, e.g.:
```rust
#[repr(simd)]
struct SimdF32<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
```
This makes a few changes:
* Establishes a maximum SIMD lane count of 2^16 (65536). This value is arbitrary, but attempts to validate lane count before hitting potential errors in the backend. It's not clear what LLVM's maximum lane count is, but cranelift's appears to be much less than `usize::MAX`, at least.
* Expands some SIMD intrinsics to support arbitrary lane counts. This resolves the ICE in the linked issue.
* Attempts to catch invalid-sized vectors during typeck when possible.
Unresolved questions:
* Generic-length vectors can't be validated in typeck and are only validated after monomorphization while computing layout. This "works", but the errors simply bail out with no context beyond the name of the type. Should these errors instead return `LayoutError` or otherwise provide context in some way? As it stands, users of `stdsimd` could trivially produce monomorphization errors by making zero-length vectors.
cc `@bjorn3`
typeck: Emit structured suggestions for tuple struct syntax
And tuple variant syntax, but that didn't fit in the subject :)
Now the fact that these are suggestions is exposed both to the layout
engine and to IDEs and rustfix for automatic application.
And tuple variant syntax, but that didn't fit in the subject :)
Now the fact that these are suggestions is exposed both to the layout
engine and to IDEs and rustfix for automatic application.
