Add #[doc(hidden)] attribute on compiler generated module.
Resolves unavoidable `missing_docs` warning/error on proc-macro crates.
Resolves#42008.
Changes not yet tested locally, however I wanted to submit first since `rustc` takes forever to compile.
This will be used to keep track of the origin of a local in the AST. In
particular, it will be used by `async fn` lowering for the locals in
`let <pat>: <ty> = __arg0;` statements.
Rename files about error codes
fixes#60017
This PR will be failed in tidy.
<details>
<summary>The log is here:</summary>
```
tidy check
tidy error: duplicate error code: 411
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:83: __diagnostic_used!(E0411);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:84: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0411".to_owned()));
tidy error: duplicate error code: 424
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:90: debug!("smart_resolve_path_fragment: E0424, source={:?}", source);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:92: __diagnostic_used!(E0424);
tidy error: Documents\GitHub\rust\src\librustc_resolve\diagnostics.rs:93: err.code(DiagnosticId::Error("E0424".to_owned()));
some tidy checks failed
```
</details>
I'd like to fix this but I don't know what to do.
I will work on later. Please let me know if you have any solutions.
r? @petrochenkov
Introduce proc_macro::Span::source_text
A function to extract the actual source behind a Span.
Background: I would like to use `syn` in a `build.rs` script to parse the rust code, and extract part of the source code. However, `syn` only gives access to proc_macro2::Span, and i would like to get the source code behind that.
I opened an issue on proc_macro2 bug tracker for this feature https://github.com/alexcrichton/proc-macro2/issues/110 and @alexcrichton said the feature should first go upstream in proc_macro. So there it is!
Since most of the Span API is unstable anyway, this is guarded by the same `proc_macro_span` feature as everything else.
Deny `async fn` in 2015 edition
This commit prevents code using `async fn` from being compiled in Rust 2015 edition.
Compiling code of the form:
```rust
async fn foo() {}
```
Will now result in the error:
```
error[E0670]: `async fn` is not permitted in the 2015 edition
--> async.rs:1:1
|
1 | async fn foo() {}
| ^^^^^
error: aborting due to error
For more information about an error, try `rustc --explain E0670`.
```
This resolves#58652 and also resolves#53714.
r? @varkor
It's present within `Token::Interpolated` as an optimization, so that if
a nonterminal is converted to a `TokenStream` multiple times, the
first-computed value is saved and reused.
But in practice it's not needed. `interpolated_to_tokenstream()` is a
cold function: it's only called a few dozen times while compiling rustc
itself, and a few hundred times across the entire `rustc-perf` suite.
Furthermore, when it is called, it is almost always the first
conversion, so no benefit is gained from it.
So this commit removes `LazyTokenStream`, along with the now-unnecessary
`Token::interpolated()`.
As well as a significant simplification, the removal speeds things up
slightly, mostly due to not having to `drop` the `LazyTokenStream`
instances.
It is currently a method of `Token`, but it only is valid to call if
`self` is a `Token::Interpolated`. This commit eliminates the
possibility of misuse by changing it to an associated function that
takes a `Nonterminal`, which also simplifies the call sites.
This requires splitting out a new function, `nonterminal_to_string`.
Rename rustc_errors dependency in rust 2018 crates
I think this is a better solution than `use rustc_errors as errors` in `lib.rs` and `use crate::errors` in modules.
Related: rust-lang/cargo#5653
cc #58099
r? @Centril
Cosmetic improvements to doc comments
This has been factored out from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/58036 to only include changes to documentation comments (throughout the rustc codebase).
r? @steveklabnik
Once you're happy with this, maybe we could get it through with r=1, so it doesn't constantly get invalidated? (I'm not sure this will be an issue, but just in case...) Anyway, thanks for your advice so far!
Require a list of features in `#[allow_internal_unstable]`
The blanket-permission slip is not great and will likely give us trouble some point down the road.
