Use "x86-64" as the target CPU for NetBSD and Bitrig on amd64.
Using "generic" disables a number of features that are present on all
x86_64 cpus, the "x86-64" target cpu is the common denominator for that
arch.
Refs #20777
LLVM upgrade
As discussed in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/need-help-with-emscripten-port/3154/46 I'm trying to update the used LLVM checkout in Rust.
I basically took @shepmaster's code and applied it on top (though I did the commits manually, the [original commits have better descriptions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...avr-rust:avr-support).
With these changes I was able to build rustc. `make check` throws one last error on `run-pass/issue-28950.rs`. Output: https://gist.github.com/badboy/bcdd3bbde260860b6159aa49070a9052
I took the metadata changes as is and they seem to work, though it now uses the module in another step. I'm not sure if this is the best and correct way.
Things to do:
* [x] ~~Make `run-pass/issue-28950.rs` pass~~ unrelated
* [x] Find out how the `PositionIndependentExecutable` setting is now used
* [x] Is the `llvm::legacy` still the right way to do these things?
cc @brson @alexcrichton
The targets are:
- `arm-unknown-linux-musleabi`
- `arm-unknown-linux-musleabihf`
- `armv7-unknown-linux-musleabihf`
These mirror the existing `gnueabi` targets.
All of these targets produce fully static binaries, similar to the
x86 MUSL targets.
For now these targets can only be used with `--rustbuild` builds, as
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-rt/pull/22 only made the
necessary compiler-rt changes in the CMake configs, not the plain
GNU Make configs.
I've tested these targets GCC 5.3.0 compiled again musl-1.1.12
(downloaded from http://musl.codu.org/). An example `./configure`
invocation is:
```
./configure \
--enable-rustbuild
--target=arm-unknown-linux-musleabi \
--musl-root="$MUSL_ROOT"
```
where `MUSL_ROOT` points to the `arm-linux-musleabi` prefix.
Usually that path will be of the form
`/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/arm-linux-musleabi`.
Usually the cross-compile toolchain will live under
`/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/bin`. That path should either by added
to your `PATH` variable, or you should add a section to your
`config.toml` as follows:
```
[target.arm-unknown-linux-musleabi]
cc = "/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/bin/arm-linux-musleabi-gcc"
cxx = "/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/bin/arm-linux-musleabi-g++"
```
As a prerequisite you'll also have to put a cross-compiled static
`libunwind.a` library in `$MUSL_ROOT/lib`. This is similar to [how
the x86_64 MUSL targets are built]
(https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/advanced-linking.html).
Convert built-in targets to JSON
Convert the built-in targets to JSON to ensure that the JSON parser is always fully featured. This follows on #32988 and #32847. The PR includes a number of extra commits that are just intermediate changes necessary for bisectibility and the ability to prove correctness of the change.
Since we can know which targets are instantiable on a particular host,
it does not make sense to list invalid targets in the target print code.
Filter the list of targets to only include the targets that can be
instantiated.
Expand the supported_targets!() macro to also generate a set of
JSON encode/decode tests to verify that the parser will encode
and decode all of the fields needed for all of the builtin targets.
Additionally, add PartialEq to Target and TargetOptions in support
of the tests.
Change all the target generation functions to return a Result<Target,
String> so that targets that are unable to be instantiated can be
expressed as an Err instead of a panic!(). This should improve #33497 as
well.
Target's can already be built up from JSON files as well as built into
librustc_back so this adds the ability to convert any Target back into
JSON.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
Not all TargetOptions are exposed via the JSON interface to create
different targets. This exposes all the missing items and reorders them
to match the structure so that it is easier in the future to identify
missing items.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
fix built-in target detection
previously the logic was accepting wrong triples (like
`x86_64_unknown-linux-musl`) as valid ones (like `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl`) if
they contained an underscore instead of a dash.
fixes#33329
---
r? @brson
I wanted to use a compile-fail test at first. But, you can't pass an extra `--target` flag to `rustc` for those because they already call `rustc --target $HOST` so you get a `error: Option 'target' given more than once.`. The run-make test used here works fine though.
Using "generic" disables a number of features that are present on all
x86_64 cpus, the "x86-64" target cpu is the common denominator for that
arch.
Refs #20777
Right now two MIPS targets in the compiler, `mips-unknown-linux-{gnu,musl}` both
generate object files using the soft-float ABI through LLVM by default. This is
also expressed as the `-C soft-float` codegen option and otherwise isn't used
for any other target in the compiler. This option was added quite some time ago
(back in #9617), and nowadays it's more appropriate to be done through a codegen
option.
This is motivated by #34743 which necessitated an upgrade in the CMake
installation on our bots which necessitated an upgrade in the Ubuntu version
which invalidated the MIPS compilers we were using. The new MIPS compilers
(coming from Debian I believe) all have hard float enabled by default and soft
float support not built in. This meant that we couldn't upgrade the bots
until #34841 landed because otherwise we would fail to compile C code as the
`-msoft-float` option wouldn't work.
Unfortunately, though, this means that once we upgrade the bots the C code we're
compiling will be compiled for hard float and the Rust code will be compiled
for soft float, a bad mismatch! This PR remedies the situation such that Rust
will compile with hard float as well.
If this lands it will likely produce broken nightlies for a day or two while we
get around to upgrading the bots because the current C toolchain only produces
soft-float binaries, and now rust will be hard-float. Hopefully, though, the
upgrade can go smoothly!
Update i686-linux-android features to match android x86 ABI.
Based on [android's official x86 ABI info](http://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html#x86), the x86 baseline CPU can be safely updated to `pentiumpro`, with the addition of `MMX`, `SSE`, `SSE2`, `SSE3`, `SSSE3` features.
r? @alexcrichton
Add armv7-linux-androideabi target
This PR adds `armv7-linux-androideabi` target that matches `armeabi-v7a` Android ABI, ~~downscales `arm-linux-androideabi` target to match `armeabi` Android ABI~~ (TBD later if needed).
This should allow us to get the best performance from every [Android ABI level](http://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html).
Currently existing target `arm-linux-androideabi` started gaining features out of the supported range of [android `armeabi`](http://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html). While android compiler does not use a different target for later supported `armv7` architecture, it has distinct ABI name `armeabi-v7a`. We decided to add rust target `armv7-linux-androideabi` to match it.
Note that `NEON`, `VFPv3-D32`, and `ThumbEE` instruction sets are not added, because not all android devices are guaranteed to support all or some of these, and [their availability should be checked at runtime](http://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html#v7a).
~~This reduces performance of existing `arm-linux-androideabi` and may make it _much_ slower (we are talking more than order of magnitude in some random ad-hoc fp benchmark that I did).~~
Part of #33278.
rustc: Change target_env for ARM targets to `gnu`
Right now they're `gnueabihf` and `gnueabi`, but when adding new platforms like
musl on ARM it's unfortunate to have to test for all three (`musl`, `musleabi`,
and `musleabihf`). This PR switches everything currently to `gnu`, and the new
musl targets can also use `musl` when they land.
Closes#33244
Right now they're `gnueabihf` and `gnueabi`, but when adding new platforms like
musl on ARM it's unfortunate to have to test for all three (`musl`, `musleabi`,
and `musleabihf`). This PR switches everything currently to `gnu`, and the new
musl targets can also use `musl` when they land.
Closes#33244
previously the logic was accepting wrong triples (like
`x86_64_unknown-linux-musl`) as valid ones (like `x86_64-unknown-linux-musl`) if
they contained an underscore instead of a dash.
fixes#33329
Enable vfp3-d16 for ARMv7 Android target
Android's [armeabi-v7a ABI][1] guarantees at least VFPv3-d16 hardware FPU support, so Rust should include this in the default features for the `arm-linux-androideabi` target.
[1]: https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html
Android's [armeabi-v7a ABI][1] guarantees at least VFPv3-d16 hardware FPU
support, so Rust should include this in the default features for the
arm-linux-androideabi target.
[1]: https://developer.android.com/ndk/guides/abis.html
librustc_back: fix incorrect comment about RUST_TARGET_PATH
The path `/etc/rustc/` is not the default last entry in
RUST_TARGET_PATH. This was in RFC131 but was never implemented in rustc
so it was removed as part of #31117 and rust-lang/rfcs#1473.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
The path `/etc/rustc/` is not the default last entry in
RUST_TARGET_PATH. This was in RFC131 but was never implemented in rustc
so it was removed as part of #31117 and rust-lang/rfcs#1473.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
Automated conversion using the untry tool [1] and the following command:
```
$ find -name '*.rs' -type f | xargs untry
```
at the root of the Rust repo.
[1]: https://github.com/japaric/untry
Similarly to #31629 where an i586-unknown-linux-gnu target was added, there is
sometimes a desire to compile for x86 Windows as well where SSE2 is disabled.
This commit mirrors the i586-unknown-linux-gnu target and simply adds a variant
for Windows as well.
This is motivated by a recent [Gecko bug][ff] where crashes were seen on 32-bit
Windows due to users having CPUs that don't support SSE2 instructions. It was
requested that we could have non-SSE2 builds of the standard library available
so they could continue to use vanilla releases and nightlies.
[ff]: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1253202
