This change adds a `MirPass` erasing all early-bound regions from MIR, right before storing it in the MIR map. I've added some assertions at neuralgic points in `trans::mir` doing cheap checks whether region have actually been erased.
Here are some assumptions that I worked under:
- AdtDef references stay untouched. It's the `Substs` accompanying them that need to be handled (e.g. in `AggregateKind::Adt`).
- We can't really get rid of late-bound regions at this point because there is no version `BareFnTy` (for example) that comes without one. These still have to be handled on demand in trans.
Are this assumptions right?
r? @nikomatsakis
Previously this function used channels but this isn't necessary any more now
that threads have return values. This also has the added bonus of appropriately
waiting for the thread to exit to ensure that the function doesn't still have
running threads once it returns.
the const evaluator has a bool constant value, no need to use integers
the `fromb` function is very old. It took me a while of git-blame until i found where it was created. I think it was just a hack. All tests still pass.
I also forbade `&&` and `||` on integral types
Previously this function used channels but this isn't necessary any more now
that threads have return values. This also has the added bonus of appropriately
waiting for the thread to exit to ensure that the function doesn't still have
running threads once it returns.
[breaking change]
I'm not sure if those renames are ok. [TokenType::Tt* to TokenType::*](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/29582) was obvious, but for all those Item-enums it's less obvious to me what the right way forward is due to the underscore.
On distros that use i486 or i586 in their CHOST, Rust will fail to build
because it is not handling i486 or i586 like i686 is handled. This
changes the match to do work for all instances of i?86 instead of just
i686. The Yocto Project still uses i586 as a target.
Signed-off-by: Doug Goldstein <cardoe@cardoe.com>
Fixes#29853Fixes#29852
While these points are true, we're not going for 100% accuracy here,
this is introductory material. Changing these things would be more
confusing, but it is important to note that we're presenting an
abstraction here.
r? @huonw
under openbsd, the library path of libstdc++ need to be explicit (due
to the fact the default linker `cc` is gcc-4.2, and not gcc-4.9).
but when a recent LLVM is installed, rustc compilation pikes the bad
LLVM version (which live in /usr/local/lib, which is same directory of
libestdc++.so for gcc-4.9).
this patch move the libstdc++ path from RUST_FLAGS_<target> to special
variable, and use it *after* LLVM_LIBDIR_RUSTFLAGS_<target> in
arguments.
r? @alexcrichton
