It will check which scheduler it is running under and create the
correct type of task as appropriate. Most options aren't supported
but basic spawning works.
`read_until` is just doing a bytewise comparison. This means the following program prints `xyå12`, not `xy`, which it should if it was actually checking chars.
```rust
fn main() {
do io::with_str_reader("xyå12") |r| {
io::println(r.read_until('å', false));
}
}
```
This patch makes the type of read_until match what it is actually doing.
This is just a bunch of minor changes and simplifications to the structure of core::rt. It makes ownership of the ~Scheduler more strict (though it is still mutably aliased sometimes), turns the scheduler cleanup_jobs vector into just a single job, shunts the thread-local scheduler code off to its own file.
r? @nikomatsakis
This doesn't completely fix the x86 ABI for structs, but it does fix some cases. On linux, structs appear to be returned correctly now. On windows, structs are only returned by pointer when they are greater than 8 bytes. That scenario works now.
In the case where the struct is less than 8 bytes our generated code looks peculiar. When returning a pair of u16, C packs both variables into %eax to return them. Our generated code though expects to find one of the pair in %ax and the other in %dx. Similar for u8. I haven't looked into it yet.
There appears to also be struct passing problems on linux, where my `extern-pass-TwoU8s` and `extern-pass-TwoU16s` tests are failing.
This Adds a bunch of tests for passing and returning structs
of various sizes to C. It fixes the struct return rules on unix,
and on windows for structs of size > 8 bytes. Struct passing
on unix for structs under a certain size appears to still be broken.
In order to do a context switch you have to give up ownership of the scheduler,
effectively passing it to the next execution context. This could help avoid
some situations here tasks retain unsafe pointers to schedulers between context
switches, across which they may have changed threads.
There are still a number of uses of unsafe scheduler pointers.
Closes#5487, #1913, and #4568
I tracked this by adding all used unsafe blocks/functions to a set on the `tcx` passed around, and then when the lint pass comes around if an unsafe block/function isn't listed in that set, it's unused.
I also removed everything from the compiler that was unused, and up to stage2 is now compiling without any known unused unsafe blocks.
I chose `unused_unsafe` as the name of the lint attribute, but there may be a better name...
This takes care of one of the last remnants of assumptions about enum layout. A type visitor is now passed a function to read a value's discriminant, then accesses fields by being passed a byte offset for each one. The latter may not be fully general, despite the constraints imposed on representations by borrowed pointers, but works for any representations currently planned and is relatively simple.
Closes#5652.
This is a follow-up to #5761. Its purpose is to make core::libc more consistent - it currently only defines SIGKILL and SIGTERM, because they are the only values that happen to be needed by libcore.
This adds all the posix signal value constants, except for those that have different values on different architectures.
The output of the command `man 7 signal` was used to compile these signal values.
value constants, except for those that have different values
on different architectures.
The output of the command `man 7 signal` was used to
compile these signal values.
The foldl based implementation allocates lots of unneeded vectors.
iter::map_to_vec is already optimized to avoid these.
One place that benefits quite a lot from this is the metadata decoder, helping with compile times for tiny programs.
The current protocol is very comparable to Python, where `.__iter__()` returns an iterator object which implements `.__next__()` and throws `StopIteration` on completion. `Option` is much cleaner than using a exceptions as a flow control hack though. It requires that the container is frozen so there's no worry about invalidating them.
Advantages over internal iterators, which are functions that are passed closures and directly implement the iteration protocol:
* Iteration is stateful, so you can interleave iteration over arbitrary containers. That's needed to implement algorithms like zip, merge, set union, set intersection, set difference and symmetric difference. I already used this internally in the `TreeMap` and `TreeSet` implementations, but regions and traits weren't solid enough to make it generic yet.
* They provide a universal, generic interface. The same trait is used for a forward/reverse iterator, an iterator over a range, etc. Internal iterators end up resulting in a trait for each possible way you could iterate.
* They can be composed with adaptors like `ZipIterator`, which also implement the same trait themselves.
The disadvantage is that they're a pain to write without support from the compiler for compiling something like `yield` to a state machine. :)
This can coexist alongside internal iterators since both can use the current `for` protocol. It's easier to write an internal iterator, but external ones are far more powerful/useful so they should probably be provided whenever possible by the standard library.
## Current issues
#5801 is somewhat annoying since explicit type hints are required.
I just wanted to get the essentials working well, so I haven't put much thought into making the naming concise (free functions vs. static `new` methods, etc.).
Making an `Iterable` trait seems like it will have to be a long-term goal, requiring type system extensions. At least without resorting to objects which would probably be unacceptably slow.
This restores the trait that was lost in 216e85fadf. It will eventually be broken up into a more fine-grained trait hierarchy in the future once a design can be agreed upon.
As proposed in issue #5632.
I added some new stuff to libc - hopefully correctly. I only added a single signal constant (SIGKILL) because adding more seems complicated by differences between platforms - and since it is not required for issue #5632 then I figure that I can use a further pull request to flesh out the SIG* constants more.
This refactors much of the ast generation required for `deriving` instances into a common interface, so that new instances only need to specify what they do with the actual data, rather than worry about naming function arguments and extracting fields from structs and enum. (This all happens in `generic.rs`. I've tried to make sure it was well commented and explained, since it's a little abstract at points, but I'm sure it's still a little confusing.)
It makes instances like the comparison traits and `Clone` short and easy to write.
Caveats:
- Not surprisingly, this slows the expansion pass (in some cases, dramatically, specifically deriving Ord or TotalOrd on enums with many variants). However, this shouldn't be too concerning, since in a more realistic case (compiling `core.rc`) the time increased by 0.01s, which isn't worth mentioning. And, it possibly slows type checking very slightly (about 2% worst case), but I'm having trouble measuring it (and I don't understand why this would happen). I think this could be resolved by using traits and encoding it all in the type system so that monomorphisation handles everything, but that would probably be a little tricky to arrange nicely, reduce flexibility and make compiling rustc take longer. (Maybe some judicious use of `#[inline(always)]` would help too; I'll have a bit of a play with it.)
- The abstraction is not currently powerful enough for:
- `IterBytes`: doesn't support arguments of type other than `&Self`.
- `Encodable`/`Decodable` (#5090): doesn't support traits with parameters.
- `Rand` & `FromStr`; doesn't support static functions and arguments of type other than `&Self`.
- `ToStr`: I don't think it supports returning `~str` yet, but I haven't actually tried.
(The last 3 are traits that might be nice to have: the derived `ToStr`/`FromStr` could just read/write the same format as `fmt!("%?", x)`, like `Show` and `Read` in Haskell.)
I have ideas to resolve all of these, but I feel like it would essentially be a simpler version of the `mt` & `ty_` parts of `ast.rs`, and I'm not sure if the simplification is worth having 2 copies of similar code.
Also, makes Ord, TotalOrd and TotalEq derivable (closes#4269, #5588 and #5589), although a snapshot is required before they can be used in the rust repo.
If there is anything that is unclear (or incorrect) either here or in the code, I'd like to get it pointed out now, so I can explain/fix it while I'm still intimately familiar with the code.
This adds an example for most of the methods in Rng.
As a total newcomer to Rust, it took a while to figure out how to do basic things like use library functions, because there aren't many usage examples, and most examples that Google turns up are out of date. Something like this would have saved me a bit of time.
This might be a bit verbose. Some alternative options would be to consolidate all the examples into one section, or to only have code for the specific function call inline.
signature. In a nutshell, the idea is to (1) report an error if, for
a region pointer `'a T`, the lifetime `'a` is longer than any
lifetimes that appear in `T` (in other words, if a borrowed pointer
outlives any portion of its contents) and then (2) use this to assume
that in a function like `fn(self: &'a &'b T)`, the relationship `'a <=
'b` holds. This is needed for #5656. Fixes#5728.
rather than a tuple. The current setup iterates over
`BaseIter<(&'self K, &'self V)>` where 'self is a lifetime declared
*in the each method*. You can't place such a type in
the impl declaration. The compiler currently allows it,
but this will not be legal under #5656 and I'm pretty sure
it's not sound now.
It was simpler to just give the variants a value instead of listing out all the cases for (*self, *other) in a match statement or writing spaghetti code. This makes the `cmp` method easier to use with FFI too, since you're a cast away from an idiomatic C comparator function. It would be fine implemented another way though.
This removes some of the easier instances of mutable fields where the explicit self can just become `&mut self` along with removing some unsafe blocks which aren't necessary any more now that purity is gone.
Most of #4568 is done, except for [one case](https://github.com/alexcrichton/rust/blob/less-mut-fields/src/libcore/vec.rs#L1754) where it looks like it has to do with it being a `const` vector. Removing the unsafe block yields:
```
/Users/alex/code/rust2/src/libcore/vec.rs:1755:12: 1755:16 error: illegal borrow unless pure: creating immutable alias to const vec content
/Users/alex/code/rust2/src/libcore/vec.rs:1755 for self.each |e| {
^~~~
/Users/alex/code/rust2/src/libcore/vec.rs:1757:8: 1757:9 note: impure due to access to impure function
/Users/alex/code/rust2/src/libcore/vec.rs:1757 }
^
error: aborting due to previous error
```
I also didn't delve too much into removing mutable fields with `Cell` or `transmute` and friends.
Performing a deep copy isn't ever desired for a persistent data
structure, and it requires a more complex implementation to do
correctly. A deep copy needs to check for cycles to avoid an infinite
loop.
Performing a deep copy isn't ever desired for a persistent data
structure, and it requires a more complex implementation to do
correctly. A deep copy needs to check for cycles to avoid an infinite
loop.
A number like 0b1_1111_1111 == 511 would be parsed to Some(255u8) rather than None
by from_str_common, since 255 * 2 + 1 == 255 (mod 256) so the overflow wasn't detected.
Only applied to conversions where the radix was a power of 2, and where all digits
repeated.
Closes#5770.
bare function store (which is not in fact a kind of value) but rather
ty::TraitRef. Removes many uses of fail!() and other telltale signs of
type-semantic mismatch.
cc #4183 (not a fix, but related)
This pull request removes some mut-fields from at_vec, str, vec, unstable, and cell. Sadly in case of Cell this required using either transmute_mut (2 instances) or changing the interface. I chose the former. Perhaps it would be a good idea to merge Cell and Option, and take that opportunity to change the interface to use '&mut self' instead of '&self' (which would enable removing the transmutations) for take and put_back.
r?
This naming is free now that `oldmap` has finally been removed, so this is a search-and-replace to take advantage of that. It might as well be called `HashMap` instead of being named after the specific implementation, since there's only one.
SipHash distributes keys so well that I don't think there will ever be much need to use anything but a simple hash table with open addressing. If there *is* a better way to do it, it will probably be better in all cases and can just be the default implementation.
A cuckoo-hashing implementation combining a weaker hash with SipHash could be useful, but that won't be as general purpose - you would need to write a separate fast hash function specialized for the type to really take advantage of it (like taking a page from libstdc++/libc++ and just using the integer value as the "hash"). I think a more specific naming for a truly alternative implementation like that would be fine, with the nice naming reserved for the general purpose container.
When I submitted #5659, it apparently caused some test failures. Then, because I left it in my incoming rather than making a new branch, I deleted my commit.
Let's try this again, this time, with its own branch so that I don't screw it up.
r?
