shim: monomorphic `FnPtrShim`s during construction
Fixes#69925.
This PR adjusts MIR shim construction so that substitutions are applied to function pointer shims during construction, rather than during codegen (as determined by `substs_for_mir_body`).
r? `@eddyb`
Implement a generic Destination Propagation optimization on MIR
This takes the work that was originally started by `@eddyb` in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/47954, and then explored by me in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/71003, and implements it in a general (ie. not limited to acyclic CFGs) and dataflow-driven way (so that no additional infrastructure in rustc is needed).
The pass is configured to run at `mir-opt-level=2` and higher only. To enable it by default, some followup work on it is still needed:
* Performance needs to be evaluated. I did some light optimization work and tested against `tuple-stress`, which caused trouble in my last attempt, but didn't go much in depth here.
* We can also enable the pass only at `opt-level=2` and higher, if it is too slow to run in debug mode, but fine when optimizations run anyways.
* Debuginfo needs to be fixed after locals are merged. I did not look into what is required for this.
* Live ranges of locals (aka `StorageLive` and `StorageDead`) are currently deleted. We either need to decide that this is fine, or if not, merge the variable's live ranges (or remove these statements entirely – https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68622).
Some benchmarks of the pass were done in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72635.
Rollup of 14 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #73963 (deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn) in libstd/path.rs)
- #75099 (lint/ty: move fns to avoid abstraction violation)
- #75502 (Use implicit (not explicit) rules for promotability by default in `const fn`)
- #75580 (Add test for checking duplicated branch or-patterns)
- #76310 (Add `[T; N]: TryFrom<Vec<T>>` (insta-stable))
- #76400 (Clean up vec benches bench_in_place style)
- #76434 (do not inline black_box when building for Miri)
- #76492 (Add associated constant `BITS` to all integer types)
- #76525 (Add as_str() to string::Drain.)
- #76636 (assert ScalarMaybeUninit size)
- #76749 (give *even better* suggestion when matching a const range)
- #76757 (don't convert types to the same type with try_into (clippy::useless_conversion))
- #76796 (Give a better error message when x.py uses the wrong stage for CI)
- #76798 (Build fixes for RISC-V 32-bit Linux support)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
give *even better* suggestion when matching a const range
notice that the err already has "constant defined here"
so this is now *exceedingly clear*
extension to #76222
r? @estebank
assert ScalarMaybeUninit size
I noticed most low-level Miri types have such an assert but `ScalarMaybeUninit` does not, so let's add that. Good t see that the `Option`-like optimization kicks in and this is no bigger than `Scalar`. :)
r? @oli-obk
Add associated constant `BITS` to all integer types
Recently I've regularly come across this snippet (in a few different crates, including `core` and `std`):
```rust
std::mem::size_of<usize>() * 8
```
I think it's time for a `usize::BITS`.
lint/ty: move fns to avoid abstraction violation
This PR moves `transparent_newtype_field` and `is_zst` to `LateContext` where they are used, rather than being on the `VariantDef` and `TyS` types, hopefully addressing @eddyb's concern [from this comment](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/74340#discussion_r456534910).
Wrap recursive predicate evaluation with `ensure_sufficient_stack`
I haven't been able to come up with a minimized test case for #76770,
but this fixes a stack overflow in rustc as well.
As a side effect, we now represent most promoteds as `ConstValue::Scalar` again. This is useful because all implict promoteds are just references anyway and most explicit promoteds are numeric arguments to `asm!` or SIMD instructions.
Dogfood new_uninit and maybe_uninit_slice in rustc_arena
Dogfoods a few cool `MaybeUninit` related features in the compiler's rustc_arena crate.
Split off from #76821
r? `@oli-obk`
Some MIR statements and terminators have an (undocumented...) invariant
that some of their input and outputs must not overlap. This records
conflicts between locals used in these positions.
