Move format_push_string to restriction
Fixes#9077 (kinda) by moving the lint to the restriction group. As I noted in that issue, I think the suggested change is too much and as the OP of the issue points out, the ramifications of the change are not necessarily easily understood. As such I don't think the lint should be enabled by default.
changelog: [`format_push_string`]: moved to restriction (see #9077).
`ty::Const` doesn't have precomputed type flags, so
computing `has_vars_bound_at_or_above` for constants
requires us to visit the const and its contained types
and constants. A noop fold should be pretty much equally as
fast so removing it prevents us from walking the constant twice
in case it contains bound vars.
Give a better error when `x dist` fails for an optional tool
Before:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'Unable to build RLS', dist.rs:42:9
```
After:
```
thread 'main' panicked at 'Unable to build submodule tool RLS (use `missing-tools = true` to ignore this failure)
note: not all tools are available on all nightlies
help: see https://forge.rust-lang.org/infra/toolstate.html for more information', dist.rs:43:9
```
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/85683 by explaining better why the error is expected.
remove allow(rustc::potential_query_instability) in rustc_span
Also, avoid sorting before debug output as iteration order can now be
relied upon.
Related #84447
Implement `for<>` lifetime binder for closures
This PR implements RFC 3216 ([TI](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97362)) and allows code like the following:
```rust
let _f = for<'a, 'b> |a: &'a A, b: &'b B| -> &'b C { b.c(a) };
// ^^^^^^^^^^^--- new!
```
cc ``@Aaron1011`` ``@cjgillot``
Implement `for<>` lifetime binder for closures
This PR implements RFC 3216 ([TI](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97362)) and allows code like the following:
```rust
let _f = for<'a, 'b> |a: &'a A, b: &'b B| -> &'b C { b.c(a) };
// ^^^^^^^^^^^--- new!
```
cc ``@Aaron1011`` ``@cjgillot``
Stabilize `core::ffi:c_*` and rexport in `std::ffi`
This only stabilizes the base types, not the non-zero variants, since
those have their own separate tracking issue and have not gone through
FCP to stabilize.
Always create elided lifetime parameters for functions
Anonymous and elided lifetimes in functions are sometimes (async fns) --and sometimes not (regular fns)-- desugared to implicit generic parameters.
This difference of treatment makes it some downstream analyses more complicated to handle. This step is a pre-requisite to perform lifetime elision resolution on AST.
There is currently an inconsistency in the treatment of argument-position impl-trait for functions and async fns:
```rust
trait Foo<'a> {}
fn foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ OK
fn bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ OK
```
The current implementation reports "missing lifetime specifier" on `foo`, but **accepts it** in `async_foo`.
This PR **proposes to accept** the anonymous lifetime in both cases as an extra generic lifetime parameter.
This change would be insta-stable, so let's ping t-lang.
Anonymous lifetimes in GAT bindings keep being forbidden:
```rust
fn foo(t: impl Foo<Assoc<'_> = Bar<'_>>) {}
^^ ^^
forbidden ok
```
I started a discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Anonymous.20lifetimes.20in.20universal.20impl-trait/near/284968606
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Always create elided lifetime parameters for functions
Anonymous and elided lifetimes in functions are sometimes (async fns) --and sometimes not (regular fns)-- desugared to implicit generic parameters.
This difference of treatment makes it some downstream analyses more complicated to handle. This step is a pre-requisite to perform lifetime elision resolution on AST.
There is currently an inconsistency in the treatment of argument-position impl-trait for functions and async fns:
```rust
trait Foo<'a> {}
fn foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_foo(t: impl Foo<'_>) {} //~ OK
fn bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ ERROR missing lifetime specifier
async fn async_bar(t: impl Iterator<Item = &'_ u8>) {} //~ OK
```
The current implementation reports "missing lifetime specifier" on `foo`, but **accepts it** in `async_foo`.
This PR **proposes to accept** the anonymous lifetime in both cases as an extra generic lifetime parameter.
This change would be insta-stable, so let's ping t-lang.
Anonymous lifetimes in GAT bindings keep being forbidden:
```rust
fn foo(t: impl Foo<Assoc<'_> = Bar<'_>>) {}
^^ ^^
forbidden ok
```
I started a discussion here: https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/213817-t-lang/topic/Anonymous.20lifetimes.20in.20universal.20impl-trait/near/284968606
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Update cargo
7 commits in b1dd22e668af5279e13a071ad4b17435bd6bfa4c..8827baaa781b37872134c1ba692a6f0aeb37890e
2022-07-09 14:48:50 +0000 to 2022-07-14 02:56:51 +0000
- Add a test for regressions in selecting the correct workspace root (rust-lang/cargo#10862)
- clarify profile used for 'cargo install --debug' (rust-lang/cargo#10861)
- servers should use 404 (rust-lang/cargo#10860)
- test(add): Ensure comments are preserved (rust-lang/cargo#10849)
- Fix nested workspace resolution (rust-lang/cargo#10846)
- Small tweaks to the future-incompat docs. (rust-lang/cargo#10856)
- Fixed extra period typo (rust-lang/cargo#10847)
This only stabilizes the base types, not the non-zero variants, since
those have their own separate tracking issue and have not gone through
FCP to stabilize.
Fix drop-tracking ICE when a struct containing a field with a significant drop is used across an await
Previously, drop-tracking would incorrectly assume the struct would be dropped immediately, which was not true.
Fixes#98476. Also fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98477, I think because the parent HIR node for type variables is the whole function instead of the expression where the variable is used.
r? `@eholk`
allow unions with mutable references and tuples of allowed types
We currently allow shared references in unions, but not mutable references. That seems somewhat inconsistent. So let's allow all references, and while we are at it, let's make sure the set of allowed types is closed under tuples.
This will need T-lang FCP (at least).
Then remove the `tagged_unions` feature, since we do not plan to stabilize any more of it.
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55149
Addresses Issue 98466 by emitting a warning if a named argument
is used like a position argument (i.e. the name is not used in
the string to be formatted).
Fixes rust-lang#98466
