Commit Graph

8524 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dylan DPC
90c59e736b
Rollup merge of #98101 - vladimir-ea:stdlib_watch_os, r=thomcc
stdlib support for Apple WatchOS

This is a follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95243 (Add Apple WatchOS compiler targets) that adds stdlib support for Apple WatchOS.

`@deg4uss3r`
`@nagisa`
2022-07-20 16:17:17 +05:30
Vladimir Michael Eatwell
439d64a83c Library changes for Apple WatchOS 2022-07-20 08:57:36 +01:00
Dylan DPC
feebc5f4d5
Rollup merge of #99452 - Stargateur:fix/typo, r=JohnTitor
int_macros was only using to_xe_bytes_doc and not from_xe_bytes_doc

typo in doc [here](https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.isize.html#method.from_ne_bytes) "returns" => "takes"

`@rustbot` label +T-rustdoc
2022-07-20 11:29:40 +05:30
Dylan DPC
80395679cb
Rollup merge of #98916 - ChrisDenton:hiberfil.sys, r=thomcc
Windows: Use `FindFirstFileW` for getting the metadata of locked system files

Fixes #96980

Usually opening a file handle with access set to metadata only will always succeed, even if the file is locked. However some special system files, such as `C:\hiberfil.sys`, are locked by the system in a way that denies even that. So as a fallback we try reading the cached metadata from the directory.

Note that the test is a bit iffy. I don't know if `hiberfil.sys` actually exists in the CI.

r? rust-lang/libs
2022-07-20 11:29:38 +05:30
bors
9a7b7d5e50 Auto merge of #98180 - notriddle:notriddle/rustdoc-fn, r=petrochenkov,GuillaumeGomez
Improve the function pointer docs

This is #97842 but for function pointers instead of tuples. The concept is basically the same.

* Reduce duplicate impls; show `fn (T₁, T₂, …, Tₙ)` and include a sentence saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.

https://notriddle.com/notriddle-rustdoc-test/std/primitive.fn.html
2022-07-19 19:36:57 +00:00
Michael Howell
ddb5a2638a Use T for all the function primitive docs lists 2022-07-19 08:52:25 -07:00
Michael Howell
5271e32c46 Improve the function pointer docs
* Reduce duplicate impls; show only the `fn (T)` and include a sentence
  saying that there exists up to twelve of them.
* Show `Copy` and `Clone`.
* Show auto traits like `Send` and `Sync`, and blanket impls like `Any`.
2022-07-19 08:52:24 -07:00
bors
a289cfcfb3 Auto merge of #99462 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-ihhwaru, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #98028 (Add E0790 as more specific variant of E0283)
 - #99384 (use body's param-env when checking if type needs drop)
 - #99401 (Avoid `Symbol` to `&str` conversions)
 - #99419 (Stabilize `core::task::ready!`)
 - #99435 (Revert "Stabilize $$ in Rust 1.63.0")
 - #99438 (Improve suggestions for `NonZeroT` <- `T` coercion error)
 - #99441 (Update mdbook)
 - #99453 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
 - #99457 (use `par_for_each_in` in `par_body_owners` and `collect_crate_mono_items`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-07-19 13:49:56 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
e6a100baa2
Rollup merge of #99438 - WaffleLapkin:dont_wrap_in_non_zero, r=compiler-errors
Improve suggestions for `NonZeroT` <- `T` coercion error

Currently, when encountering a type mismatch error with `NonZeroT` and `T` (for example `NonZeroU8` and `u8`) we errorneusly suggest wrapping expression in `NonZeroT`:
```text
error[E0308]: mismatched types
 --> ./t.rs:7:35
  |
7 |     let _: std::num::NonZeroU64 = 1;
  |            --------------------   ^ expected struct `NonZeroU64`, found integer
  |            |
  |            expected due to this
  |
help: try wrapping the expression in `std::num::NonZeroU64`
  |
7 |     let _: std::num::NonZeroU64 = std::num::NonZeroU64(1);
  |                                   +++++++++++++++++++++ +
```

I've removed this suggestion and added suggestions to call `new` (for `Option<NonZeroT>` <- `T` case) or `new` and `unwrap` (for `NonZeroT` <- `T` case):

```text
error[E0308]: mismatched types
 --> ./t.rs:7:35
  |
7 |     let _: std::num::NonZeroU64 = 1;
  |            --------------------   ^ expected struct `NonZeroU64`, found integer
  |            |
  |            expected due to this
  |
help: Consider calling `NonZeroU64::new`
  |
7 |     let _: std::num::NonZeroU64 = NonZeroU64::new(1).unwrap();
  |                                   ++++++++++++++++ ++++++++++

error[E0308]: mismatched types
 --> ./t.rs:8:43
  |
8 |     let _: Option<std::num::NonZeroU64> = 1;
  |            ----------------------------   ^ expected enum `Option`, found integer
  |            |
  |            expected due to this
  |
  = note: expected enum `Option<NonZeroU64>`
             found type `{integer}`
help: Consider calling `NonZeroU64::new`
  |
8 |     let _: Option<std::num::NonZeroU64> = NonZeroU64::new(1);
  |                                           ++++++++++++++++ +
```

r? `@compiler-errors`
2022-07-19 13:30:49 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
7d754976c4
Rollup merge of #99419 - yoshuawuyts:stabilize-task-ready, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Stabilize `core::task::ready!`

This stabilizes `core::task::ready!` for Rust 1.64. The FCP for stabilization was just completed here https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/70922#issuecomment-1186231855. Thanks!

Closes #70922

cc/ ``@rust-lang/libs-api``
2022-07-19 13:30:47 +02:00
bors
8bd12e8cca Auto merge of #98912 - nrc:provider-it, r=yaahc
core::any: replace some generic types with impl Trait

This gives a cleaner API since the caller only specifies the concrete type they usually want to.

r? `@yaahc`
2022-07-19 11:28:20 +00:00
bors
4603ac31b0 Auto merge of #99451 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-ceghu18, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #97183 (wf-check generators)
 - #98320 (Mention first and last macro in backtrace)
 - #99335 (Use split_once in FromStr docs)
 - #99347 (Use `LocalDefId` in `OpaqueTypeKey`)
 - #99392 (Fix debuginfo tests.)
 - #99404 (Use span_bug for unexpected field projection type)
 - #99410 (Update invalid atomic ordering lint)
 - #99434 (Fix `Skip::next` for non-fused inner iterators)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-07-19 08:32:32 +00:00
Antoine PLASKOWSKI
94f633b002 int_macros was only using to_xe_bytes_doc and not from_xe_bytes_doc 2022-07-19 08:32:08 +02:00
Dylan DPC
e301cd39ad
Rollup merge of #99434 - timvermeulen:skip_next_non_fused, r=scottmcm
Fix `Skip::next` for non-fused inner iterators

`iter.skip(n).next()` will currently call `nth` and `next` in succession on `iter`, without checking whether `nth` exhausts the iterator. Using `?` to propagate a `None` value returned by `nth` avoids this.
2022-07-19 11:38:58 +05:30
Dylan DPC
9f6a2fde34
Rollup merge of #99335 - Dav1dde:fromstr-docs, r=JohnTitor
Use split_once in FromStr docs

Current implementation:

```rust
    fn from_str(s: &str) -> Result<Self, Self::Err> {
        let coords: Vec<&str> = s.trim_matches(|p| p == '(' || p == ')' )
                                 .split(',')
                                 .collect();

        let x_fromstr = coords[0].parse::<i32>()?;
        let y_fromstr = coords[1].parse::<i32>()?;

        Ok(Point { x: x_fromstr, y: y_fromstr })
    }
```

Creating the vector is not necessary, `split_once` does the job better.

Alternatively we could also remove `trim_matches` with `strip_prefix` and `strip_suffix`:

```rust
        let (x, y) = s
            .strip_prefix('(')
            .and_then(|s| s.strip_suffix(')'))
            .and_then(|s| s.split_once(','))
            .unwrap();
```

The question is how much 'correctness' is too much and distracts from the example. In a real implementation you would also not unwrap (or originally access the vector without bounds checks), but implementing a custom Error and adding a `From<ParseIntError>` and implementing the `Error` trait adds a lot of code to the example which is not relevant to the `FromStr` trait.
2022-07-19 11:38:53 +05:30
bors
c3f35504d1 Auto merge of #98189 - mystor:fast_ident_literal, r=eddyb
proc_macro/bridge: stop using a remote object handle for proc_macro Ident and Literal

This is the fourth part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86822, split off as requested in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/86822#pullrequestreview-1008655452. This patch transforms the `Ident` and `Group` types into structs serialized over IPC rather than handles.

Symbol values are interned on both the client and server when deserializing, to avoid unnecessary string copies and keep the size of `TokenTree` down. To do the interning efficiently on the client, the proc-macro crate is given a vendored version of the fxhash hasher, as `SipHash` appeared to cause performance issues. This was done rather than depending on `rustc_hash` as it is unfortunately difficult to depend on crates from within `proc_macro` due to it being built at the same time as `std`.

In addition, a custom arena allocator and symbol store was also added, inspired by those in `rustc_arena` and `rustc_span`. To prevent symbol re-use across multiple invocations of a macro on the same thread, a new range of `Symbol` names are used for each invocation of the macro, and symbols from previous invocations are cleaned-up.

In order to keep `Ident` creation efficient, a special ASCII-only case was added to perform ident validation without using RPC for simple identifiers. Full identifier validation couldn't be easily added, as it would require depending on the `rustc_lexer` and `unicode-normalization` crates from within `proc_macro`. Unicode identifiers are validated and normalized using RPC.

See the individual commit messages for more details on trade-offs and design decisions behind these patches.
2022-07-19 05:46:45 +00:00
Maybe Waffle
7163e7ff65 Suggest a fix for NonZero* <- * coercion error 2022-07-19 00:13:29 +04:00
Tim Vermeulen
e52837c362 Add note to test about Unfuse 2022-07-18 21:53:35 +02:00
Tim Vermeulen
50c612faef Fix Skip::next for non-fused inner iterators 2022-07-18 21:10:47 +02:00
Nika Layzell
c4acac6443 proc_macro: Move subspan to be a method on Span in the bridge
This method is still only used for Literal::subspan, however the
implementation only depends on the Span component, so it is simpler and
more efficient for now to pass down only the information that is needed.
In the future, if more information about the Literal is required in the
implementation (e.g. to validate that spans line up as expected with
source text), that extra information can be added back with extra
arguments.
2022-07-18 13:06:51 -04:00
Nika Layzell
b34c79f8f1 proc_macro: stop using a remote object handle for Literal
This builds on the symbol infrastructure built for `Ident` to replicate
the `LitKind` and `Lit` structures in rustc within the `proc_macro`
client, allowing literals to be fully created and interacted with from
the client thread. Only parsing and subspan operations still require
sync RPC.
2022-07-18 13:06:51 -04:00
Nika Layzell
491fccfbe3 proc_macro: stop using a remote object handle for Ident
Doing this for all unicode identifiers would require a dependency on
`unicode-normalization` and `rustc_lexer`, which is currently not
possible for `proc_macro` due to it being built concurrently with `std`
and `core`. Instead, ASCII identifiers are validated locally, and an RPC
message is used to validate unicode identifiers when needed.

String values are interned on the both the server and client when
deserializing, to avoid unnecessary copies and keep Ident cheap to copy and
move. This appears to be important for performance.

The client-side interner is based roughly on the one from rustc_span, and uses
an arena inspired by rustc_arena.

RPC messages passing symbols always include the full value. This could
potentially be optimized in the future if it is revealed to be a
performance bottleneck.

Despite now having a relevant implementaion of Display for Ident, ToString is
still specialized, as it is a hot-path for this object.

The symbol infrastructure will also be used for literals in the next
part.
2022-07-18 12:59:14 -04:00
Nika Layzell
e0dce6ec8d proc_macro: Specialize Punct::to_string
This was removed in a previous part, however it should be specialized for
to_string performance and consistency.
2022-07-18 12:59:14 -04:00
Nika Layzell
17e96879d8 proc_macro: use fxhash within the proc_macro crate
Unfortunately, as it is difficult to depend on crates from within proc_macro,
this is done by vendoring a copy of the hasher as a module rather than
depending on the rustc_hash crate.

This probably doesn't have a substantial impact up-front, however will be more
relevant once symbols are interned within the proc_macro client.
2022-07-18 12:59:14 -04:00
Dylan DPC
e423a6f5f0
Rollup merge of #99198 - RalfJung:alloc-null-ptr, r=JohnTitor
add missing null ptr check in alloc example

`alloc` can return null on OOM, if I understood correctly. So we should never just deref a pointer we get from `alloc`.
2022-07-18 21:14:45 +05:30
Dylan DPC
5ccdf1f6f7
Rollup merge of #98839 - 5225225:assert_transmute_copy_size, r=thomcc
Add assertion that `transmute_copy`'s U is not larger than T

This is called out as a safety requirement in the docs, but because knowing this can be done at compile time and constant folded (just like the `align_of` branch is removed), we can just panic here.

I've looked at the asm (using `cargo-asm`) of a function that both is correct and incorrect, and the panic is completely removed, or is unconditional, without needing build-std.

I don't expect this to cause much breakage in the wild. I scanned through https://miri.saethlin.dev/ub for issues that would look like this (error: Undefined Behavior: memory access failed: alloc1768 has size 1, so pointer to 8 bytes starting at offset 0 is out-of-bounds), but couldn't find any.

That doesn't rule out it happening in crates tested that fail earlier for some other reason, though, but it indicates that doing this is rare, if it happens at all. A crater run for this would need to be build and test, since this is a runtime thing.

Also added a few more transmute_copy tests.
2022-07-18 21:14:42 +05:30
Chris Denton
eee8ca9a44
Ignore hiberfil_sys test in CI
The file it's testing does not exist in the CI environment.
2022-07-18 15:06:07 +01:00
Yoshua Wuyts
454313fe83 stabilize core::task::ready! 2022-07-18 16:04:52 +02:00
bors
9ed0bf9f2b Auto merge of #99223 - saethlin:panicless-split-mut, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Rearrange slice::split_mut to remove bounds check

Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86313

Turns out that all we need to do here is reorder the bounds checks to convince LLVM that all the bounds checks can be removed. It seems like LLVM just fails to propagate the original length information past the first bounds check and into the second one. With this implementation it doesn't need to, each check can be proven inbounds based on the one immediately previous.

I've gradually convinced myself that this implementation is unambiguously better based on the above logic, but maybe this is still deserving of a codegen test?

Also the mentioned borrowck limitation no longer seems to exist.
2022-07-18 10:16:58 +00:00
David Herberth
c1c1abc08a Use split_once in FromStr docs 2022-07-18 08:57:43 +02:00
Yuki Okushi
7c98c92ebc
Rollup merge of #99374 - TethysSvensson:patch-1, r=Dylan-DPC
Fix doc for `rchunks_exact`

`rchunks_exact` is not a more optimized version of `chunks`, but of `rchunks`.
2022-07-18 08:40:02 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
796bc7cae3
Rollup merge of #98383 - m-ou-se:remove-memory-order-restrictions, r=joshtriplett
Remove restrictions on compare-exchange memory ordering.

We currently don't allow the failure memory ordering of compare-exchange operations to be stronger than the success ordering, as was the case in C++11 when its memory model was copied to Rust. However, this restriction was lifted in C++17 as part of [p0418r2](https://wg21.link/p0418r2). It's time  we lift the restriction too.

| Success | Failure | Before | After |
|---------|---------|--------|-------|
| Relaxed | Relaxed | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Relaxed | Acquire |                 | ✔️ |
| Relaxed | SeqCst  |                 | ✔️ |
| Acquire | Relaxed | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Acquire | Acquire | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Acquire | SeqCst  |                 | ✔️ |
| Release | Relaxed | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| Release | Acquire |                 | ✔️ |
| Release | SeqCst  |                 | ✔️ |
| AcqRel  | Relaxed | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| AcqRel  | Acquire | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| AcqRel  | SeqCst  |                 | ✔️ |
| SeqCst  | Relaxed | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| SeqCst  | Acquire | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| SeqCst  | SeqCst  | ✔️ | ✔️ |
| \*      | Release |                 |                 |
| \*      | AcqRel  |                 |                 |

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/68464
2022-07-18 08:39:57 +09:00
Michael Howell
1169832f2f rustdoc: extend #[doc(tuple_variadic)] to fn pointers
The attribute is also renamed `fake_variadic`.
2022-07-17 16:32:06 -07:00
Tethys Svensson
8c58de5e2c
Fix for rchunks_exact doc
`rchunks_exact` is not a more optimized version of `chunks`, but of `rchunks`.
2022-07-17 14:18:36 +02:00
Yuki Okushi
50527690e2
Rollup merge of #99306 - JohnTitor:stabilize-future-poll-fn, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize `future_poll_fn`

FCP is done: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/72302#issuecomment-1179620512
Closes #72302

r? `@joshtriplett` as you started FCP

Signed-off-by: Yuki Okushi <jtitor@2k36.org>
2022-07-17 13:08:52 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
28cce683ad
Rollup merge of #99302 - yaahc:gma-tracking-issue, r=joshtriplett
add tracking issue to generic member access APIs

Missed as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98072
2022-07-17 13:08:51 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
f49d267136
Rollup merge of #99088 - niklasf:stabilize-process_set_process_group, r=joshtriplett
Document and stabilize process_set_process_group

Tracking issue: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93857

FCP finished here: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/93857#issuecomment-1179551697
2022-07-17 13:08:50 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
48cf43b752
Rollup merge of #97915 - tbu-:pr_os_string_fmt_write, r=joshtriplett
Implement `fmt::Write` for `OsString`

This allows to format into an `OsString` without unnecessary
allocations. E.g.

```
let mut temp_filename = path.into_os_string();
write!(&mut temp_filename, ".tmp.{}", process::id());
```
2022-07-17 13:08:48 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
353d0180bb
Rollup merge of #94927 - c410-f3r:stabilize-let-chains, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize `let_chains` in Rust 1.64

# Stabilization proposal

This PR proposes the stabilization of `#![feature(let_chains)]` in a future-compatibility way that will allow the **possible** addition of the `EXPR is PAT` syntax.

Tracking issue: #53667
Version: 1.64 (beta => 2022-08-11, stable => 2022-10-22).

## What is stabilized

The ability to chain let expressions along side local variable declarations or ordinary conditional expressions. For example:

```rust
pub enum Color {
    Blue,
    Red,
    Violet,
}

pub enum Flower {
    Rose,
    Tulip,
    Violet,
}

pub fn roses_are_red_violets_are_blue_printer(
    (first_flower, first_flower_color): (Flower, Color),
    (second_flower, second_flower_color): (Flower, Color),
    pick_up_lines: &[&str],
) {
    if let Flower::Rose = first_flower
        && let Color::Red = first_flower_color
        && let Flower::Violet = second_flower
        && let Color::Blue = second_flower_color
        && let &[first_pick_up_line, ..] = pick_up_lines
    {
        println!("Roses are red, violets are blue, {}", first_pick_up_line);
    }
}

fn main() {
    roses_are_red_violets_are_blue_printer(
        (Flower::Rose, Color::Red),
        (Flower::Violet, Color::Blue),
        &["sugar is sweet and so are you"],
    );
}
```

## Motivation

The main motivation for this feature is improving readability, ergonomics and reducing paper cuts.

For more examples, see the [RFC](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blob/master/text/2497-if-let-chains.md).

## What isn't stabilized

* Let chains in match guards (`if_let_guard`)

* Resolution of divergent non-terminal matchers

* The `EXPR is PAT` syntax

## History

* On 2017-12-24, [RFC: if- and while-let-chains](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2260)
* On 2018-07-12, [eRFC: if- and while-let-chains, take 2](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/2497)
* On 2018-08-24, [Tracking issue for eRFC 2497, "if- and while-let-chains, take 2](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53667)
* On 2019-03-19, [Run branch cleanup after copy prop](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59290)
* On 2019-03-26, [Generalize diagnostic for x = y where bool is the expected type](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59439)
* On 2019-04-24, [Introduce hir::ExprKind::Use and employ in for loop desugaring](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60225)
* On 2019-03-19, [[let_chains, 1/6] Remove hir::ExprKind::If](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/59288)
* On 2019-05-15, [[let_chains, 2/6] Introduce Let(..) in AST, remove IfLet + WhileLet and parse let chains](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/60861)
* On 2019-06-20, [[let_chains, 3/6] And then there was only Loop](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/61988)
* On 2020-11-22, [Reintroduce hir::ExprKind::If](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79328)
* On 2020-12-24, [Introduce hir::ExprKind::Let - Take 2](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80357)
* On 2021-02-19, [Lower condition of if expression before it's "then" block](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82308)
* On 2021-09-01, [Fix drop handling for `if let` expressions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88572)
* On 2021-09-04, [Formally implement let chains](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88642)
* On 2022-01-19, [Add tests to ensure that let_chains works with if_let_guard](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93086)
* On 2022-01-18, [Introduce `enhanced_binary_op` feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93049)
* On 2022-01-22, [Fix `let_chains` and `if_let_guard` feature flags](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93213)
* On 2022-02-25, [Initiate the inner usage of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94376)
* On 2022-01-28, [[WIP] Introduce ast::StmtKind::LetElse to allow the usage of `let_else` with `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93437)
* On 2022-02-26, [1 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94396)
* On 2022-02-26, [2 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94400)
* On 2022-02-27, [3 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94420)
* On 2022-02-28, [4 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94445)
* On 2022-02-28, [5 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94448)
* On 2022-02-28, [6 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94465)
* On 2022-03-01, [7 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94476)
* On 2022-03-01, [8 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94484)
* On 2022-03-01, [9 - Make more use of `let_chains`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94498)
* On 2022-03-08, [Warn users about `||` in let chain expressions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94754)

From the first RFC (2017-12-24) to the theoretical future stabilization day (2022-10-22), it can be said that this feature took 4 years, 9 months and 28 days of research, development, discussions, agreements and headaches to be settled.

## Divergent non-terminal matchers

More specifically, https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/86730.

```rust
macro_rules! mac {
    ($e:expr) => {
        if $e {
            true
        } else {
            false
        }
    };
}

fn main() {
    // OK!
    assert_eq!(mac!(true && let 1 = 1), true);

    // ERROR! Anything starting with `let` is not considered an expression
    assert_eq!(mac!(let 1 = 1 && true), true);
}
```

To the best of my knowledge, such error or divergence is orthogonal, does not prevent stabilization and can be tackled independently in the near future or effectively in the next Rust 2024 edition. If not, then https://github.com/c410-f3r/rust/tree/let-macro-blah contains a set of changes that will consider `let` an expression.

It is possible that none of the solutions above satisfies all applicable constraints but I personally don't know of any other plausible answers.

## Alternative syntax

Taking into account the usefulness of this feature and the overwhelming desire to use both now and in the past, `let PAT = EXPR` will be utilized for stabilization but it doesn't or shall create any obstacle for a **possible** future addition of `EXPR is PAT`.

The introductory snippet would then be written as the following.

```rust
if first_flower is Flower::Rose
    && first_flower_color is Color::Red
    && second_flower is Flower::Violet
    && second_flower_color is Color::Blue
    && pick_up_lines is &[first_pick_up_line, ..]
{
    println!("Roses are red, violets are blue, {}", first_pick_up_line);
}
```

Just to reinforce, this PR only unblocks a **possible** future road for `EXPR is PAT` and does emphasize what is better or what is worse.

## Tests

* [Verifies the drop order of let chains and ensures it won't change in the future in an unpredictable way](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/mir/mir_let_chains_drop_order.rs)

* [AST lowering does not wrap let chains in an `DropTemps` expression](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/ast-lowering-does-not-wrap-let-chains.rs)

* [Checks pretty printing output](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/ast-pretty-check.rs)

* [Verifies uninitialized variables due to MIR modifications](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/chains-without-let.rs)

* [A collection of statements where `let` expressions are forbidden](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/disallowed-positions.rs)

* [All or at least most of the places where let chains are allowed](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/feature-gate.rs)

* [Ensures that irrefutable lets are allowed in let chains](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/irrefutable-lets.rs)

* [issue-88498.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/issue-88498.rs), [issue-90722.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/issue-90722.rs), [issue-92145.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/issue-92145.rs) and [issue-93150.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/issue-93150.rs) were bugs found by third parties and fixed overtime.

* [Indexing was triggering a ICE due to a wrongly constructed MIR graph](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/no-double-assigments.rs)

* [Protects the precedence of `&&` in relation to other things](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/protect-precedences.rs)

* [`let_chains`, as well as `if_let_guard`, has a valid MIR graph that evaluates conditional expressions correctly](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/rfc-2497-if-let-chains/then-else-blocks.rs)

Most of the infra-structure used by let chains is also used by `if` expressions in stable compiler versions since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80357 and https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88572. As a result, no bugs were found since the integration of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/88642.

## Possible future work

* Let chains in match guards is implemented and working but stabilization is blocked by `if_let_guard`.

* The usage of `let_chains` with `let_else` is possible but not implemented. Regardless, one attempt was introduced and closed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93437.

Thanks `@Centril` for creating the RFC and huge thanks (again) to `@matthewjasper` for all the reviews, mentoring and MIR implementations.

Fixes #53667
2022-07-17 13:08:47 +09:00
bors
db41351753 Auto merge of #98866 - nagisa:nagisa/align-offset-wroom, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Add a special case for align_offset /w stride != 1

This generalizes the previous `stride == 1` special case to apply to any
situation where the requested alignment is divisible by the stride. This
in turn allows the test case from #98809 produce ideal assembly, along
the lines of:

    leaq 15(%rdi), %rax
    andq $-16, %rax

This also produces pretty high quality code for situations where the
alignment of the input pointer isn’t known:

    pub unsafe fn ptr_u32(slice: *const u32) -> *const u32 {
        slice.offset(slice.align_offset(16) as isize)
    }

    // =>

    movl %edi, %eax
    andl $3, %eax
    leaq 15(%rdi), %rcx
    andq $-16, %rcx
    subq %rdi, %rcx
    shrq $2, %rcx
    negq %rax
    sbbq %rax, %rax
    orq  %rcx, %rax
    leaq (%rdi,%rax,4), %rax

Here LLVM is smart enough to replace the `usize::MAX` special case with
a branch-less bitwise-OR approach, where the mask is constructed using
the neg and sbb instructions. This appears to work across various
architectures I’ve tried.

This change ends up introducing more branches and code in situations
where there is less knowledge of the arguments. For example when the
requested alignment is entirely unknown. This use-case was never really
a focus of this function, so I’m not particularly worried, especially
since llvm-mca is saying that the new code is still appreciably faster,
despite all the new branching.

Fixes #98809.
Sadly, this does not help with #72356.
2022-07-16 23:28:28 +00:00
Caio
3266460749 Stabilize let_chains 2022-07-16 20:17:58 -03:00
Simonas Kazlauskas
62a182cf7f Add a special case for align_offset /w stride != 1
This generalizes the previous `stride == 1` special case to apply to any
situation where the requested alignment is divisible by the stride. This
in turn allows the test case from #98809 produce ideal assembly, along
the lines of:

    leaq 15(%rdi), %rax
    andq $-16, %rax

This also produces pretty high quality code for situations where the
alignment of the input pointer isn’t known:

    pub unsafe fn ptr_u32(slice: *const u32) -> *const u32 {
        slice.offset(slice.align_offset(16) as isize)
    }

    // =>

    movl %edi, %eax
    andl $3, %eax
    leaq 15(%rdi), %rcx
    andq $-16, %rcx
    subq %rdi, %rcx
    shrq $2, %rcx
    negq %rax
    sbbq %rax, %rax
    orq  %rcx, %rax
    leaq (%rdi,%rax,4), %rax

Here LLVM is smart enough to replace the `usize::MAX` special case with
a branch-less bitwise-OR approach, where the mask is constructed using
the neg and sbb instructions. This appears to work across various
architectures I’ve tried.

This change ends up introducing more branches and code in situations
where there is less knowledge of the arguments. For example when the
requested alignment is entirely unknown. This use-case was never really
a focus of this function, so I’m not particularly worried, especially
since llvm-mca is saying that the new code is still appreciably faster,
despite all the new branching.

Fixes #98809.
Sadly, this does not help with #72356.
2022-07-17 01:27:37 +03:00
Josh Triplett
629b0b488b
Expand documentation for process_group
Explain PGID 0, and provide the acronym PGID.
2022-07-16 14:45:16 -07:00
Josh Triplett
3855e86873
Update since version to 1.64 2022-07-16 14:36:48 -07:00
Matthias Krüger
ddc32d1633
Rollup merge of #99317 - yanchith:borrow-vec-ta-as-slice-t, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Borrow Vec<T, A> as [T]

Hello all,

When `Vec` was parametrized with `A`, the `Borrow` impls were omitted and currently `Vec<T, A>` can't be borrowed as `[T]`. This PR fixes that.

This was probably missed, because the `Borrow` impls are in a different file - `src/alloc/slice.rs`.

We briefly discussed this here: https://github.com/rust-lang/wg-allocators/issues/96 and I was told to go ahead and make a PR :)

I tested this by building the toolchain and building my code that needed the `Borrow` impl against it, but let me know if I should add any tests to this PR.
2022-07-16 22:30:54 +02:00
Ben Kimock
c9373903e7 Rearrange slice::split_mut to remove bounds check 2022-07-16 12:26:37 -04:00
yanchith
aeb949753e Borrow Vec<T, A> as [T] 2022-07-16 11:58:26 +02:00
Yuki Okushi
083a253e53
Rollup merge of #99277 - joshtriplett:stabilize-core-cstr-alloc-cstring, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Stabilize `core::ffi::CStr`, `alloc::ffi::CString`, and friends

Stabilize the `core_c_str` and `alloc_c_string` feature gates.

Change `std::ffi` to re-export these types rather than creating type
aliases, since they now have matching stability.
2022-07-16 17:53:04 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
96474a718b
Rollup merge of #99270 - rhysd:issue-99269, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Add `#[must_use]` to `Box::from_raw`

Fixes #99269
2022-07-16 17:53:03 +09:00
Yuki Okushi
8a64529763
Rollup merge of #99264 - eltociear:patch-14, r=compiler-errors
Fix typo in mod.rs

constuct -> construct
2022-07-16 17:53:02 +09:00