...and remove it from `PointeeInfo`, which isn't meant for this.
There are still various places (marked with FIXMEs) that assume all pointers
have the same size and alignment. Fixing this requires parsing non-default
address spaces in the data layout string, which will be done in a followup.
Various cleanups around pre-TyCtxt queries and functions
part of #105462
based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/106776 (everything starting at [0e2b39f](0e2b39fd1f) is new in this PR)
r? `@petrochenkov`
I think this should be most of the uncontroversial part of #105462.
Rollup of 7 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #104505 (Remove double spaces after dots in comments)
- #106784 (prevent E0512 from emitting [type error] by checking the references_error)
- #106834 (new trait solver: only consider goal changed if response is not identity)
- #106889 (Mention the lack of `windows_mut` in `windows`)
- #106963 (Use `scope_expr_id` from `ProbeCtxt`)
- #106970 (Switch to `EarlyBinder` for `item_bounds` query)
- #106980 (Hide `_use_mk_alias_ty_instead` in `<AliasTy as Debug>::fmt`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Previously, it was only put on scalars with range validity invariants
like bool, was uninit was obviously invalid for those.
Since then, we have normatively declared all uninit primitives to be
undefined behavior and can therefore put `noundef` on them.
The remaining concern was the `mem::uninitialized` function, which cause
quite a lot of UB in the older parts of the ecosystem. This function now
doesn't return uninit values anymore, making users of it safe from this
change.
The only real sources of UB where people could encounter uninit
primitives are `MaybeUninit::uninit().assume_init()`, which has always
be clear in the docs about being UB and from heap allocations (like
reading from the spare capacity of a vec. This is hopefully rare enough
to not break anything.
Fix aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu_ilp32 target
This was broken because the synthetic object files produced by rustc were for 64-bit AArch64, which caused link failures when combined with 32-bit ILP32 object files.
This PR updates the object crate to 0.30.1 which adds support for generating ILP32 AArch64 object files.
This was broken because the synthetic object files produced by rustc
were for 64-bit AArch64, which caused link failures when combined with
32-bit ILP32 object files.
This PR updates the object crate to 0.30.1 which adds support for
generating ILP32 AArch64 object files.
Migrate `codegen_ssa` to diagnostics structs - [Part 3]
Completes migrating `codegen_ssa` module except 2 outstanding errors that depend on other crates:
1. [`rustc_middle::mir::interpret::InterpError`](b6097f2e1b/compiler/rustc_middle/src/mir/interpret/error.rs (L475)): I saw `rustc_middle` is unassigned, I am open to take this work.
2. `codegen_llvm`'s use of `fn span_invalid_monomorphization_error`, which I started to replace in the [last commit](9a31b3cdda) of this PR, but would like to know the team's preference on how we should keep replacing the other macros:
2.1. Update macros to expect a `Diagnostic`
2.2. Remove macros and expand the code on each use.
See [some examples of the different options in this experimental commit](64aee83e80)
_Part 2 - https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/103792_
r? ``@davidtwco``
Cc ``@compiler-errors``
Remove wrapper functions for some unstable options
They are trivial and just forward to the option. Like most other options, we can just access it directly.
Allow building std with cranelift
- Don't pass llvm-specific args when using cranelift
- Don't use `asm` in compiler_builtins when using cranelift
r? `@bjorn3` cc `@Mark-Simulacrum`
Correct branch-protection ModFlagBehavior for Aarch64 on LLVM-15
When building with Fat LTO and BTI enabled on aarch64, the BTI is set to `Module::Min` for alloc shim but is set to `Module::Error` for the crate. This was fine when we were using LLVM-14 but LLVM-15 changes it's behaviour to support for compiling with different `mbranch-protection` flags.
Refer:
b0343a38a5
fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102162
When building with Fat LTO and BTI enabled on aarch64, the BTI is set to
`Module::Min` for alloc shim but is set to `Module::Error` for the
crate. This was fine when we were using LLVM-14 but LLVM-15 changes it's
behaviour to support for compiling with different `mbranch-protection`
flags.
Refer:
b0343a38a5
Following the s390x ELF ABI and based on the clang implementation,
provide appropriate definitions of va_list in library/core/src/ffi/mod.rs
and va_arg handling in compiler/rustc_codegen_llvm/src/va_arg.rs.
Fixes the following test cases on s390x:
src/test/run-make-fulldeps/c-link-to-rust-va-list-fn
src/test/ui/abi/variadic-ffi.rs
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/84628.
Use struct types during codegen in less places
This makes it easier to use cg_ssa from a backend like Cranelift that doesn't have any struct types at all. After this PR struct types are still used for function arguments and return values. Removing those usages is harder but should still be doable.
Don't internalize __llvm_profile_counter_bias
Currently, LLVM profiling runtime counter relocation cannot be used by rust during LTO because symbols are being internalized before all symbol information is known.
This mode makes LLVM emit a __llvm_profile_counter_bias symbol which is referenced by the profiling initialization, which itself is pulled in by the rust driver here [1].
It is enabled with -Cllvm-args=-runtime-counter-relocation for platforms which are opt-in to this mode like Linux. On these platforms there will be no link error, rather just surprising behavior for a user which request runtime counter relocation. The profiling runtime will not see that symbol go on as if it were never there. On Fuchsia, the profiling runtime must have this symbol which will cause a hard link error.
As an aside, I don't have enough context as to why rust's LTO model is how it is. AFAICT, the internalize pass is only safe to run at link time when all symbol information is actually known, this being an example as to why. I think special casing this symbol as a known one that LLVM can emit which should not have it's visbility de-escalated should be fine given how seldom this pattern of defining an undefined symbol to get initilization code pulled in is. From a quick grep, __llvm_profile_runtime is the only symbol that rustc does this for.
[1] 0265a3e93b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/linker.rs (L598)
Add LLVM KCFI support to the Rust compiler
This PR adds LLVM Kernel Control Flow Integrity (KCFI) support to the Rust compiler. It initially provides forward-edge control flow protection for operating systems kernels for Rust-compiled code only by aggregating function pointers in groups identified by their return and parameter types. (See llvm/llvm-project@cff5bef.)
Forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code share the same virtual address space) will be provided in later work as part of this project by identifying C char and integer type uses at the time types are encoded (see Type metadata in the design document in the tracking issue #89653).
LLVM KCFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=kcfi.
Thank you again, `@bjorn3,` `@eddyb,` `@nagisa,` and `@ojeda,` for all the help!
This commit adds LLVM Kernel Control Flow Integrity (KCFI) support to
the Rust compiler. It initially provides forward-edge control flow
protection for operating systems kernels for Rust-compiled code only by
aggregating function pointers in groups identified by their return and
parameter types. (See llvm/llvm-project@cff5bef.)
Forward-edge control flow protection for C or C++ and Rust -compiled
code "mixed binaries" (i.e., for when C or C++ and Rust -compiled code
share the same virtual address space) will be provided in later work as
part of this project by identifying C char and integer type uses at the
time types are encoded (see Type metadata in the design document in the
tracking issue #89653).
LLVM KCFI can be enabled with -Zsanitizer=kcfi.
Co-authored-by: bjorn3 <17426603+bjorn3@users.noreply.github.com>
Currently, LLVM profiling runtime counter relocation cannot be
used by rust during LTO because symbols are being internalized
before all symbol information is known.
This mode makes LLVM emit a __llvm_profile_counter_bias symbol
which is referenced by the profiling initialization, which itself
is pulled in by the rust driver here [1].
It is enabled with -Cllvm-args=-runtime-counter-relocation for
platforms which are opt-in to this mode like Linux. On these
platforms there will be no link error, rather just surprising
behavior for a user which request runtime counter relocation.
The profiling runtime will not see that symbol go on as if it
were never there. On Fuchsia, the profiling runtime must have
this symbol which will cause a hard link error.
As an aside, I don't have enough context as to why rust's LTO
model is how it is. AFAICT, the internalize pass is only safe
to run at link time when all symbol information is actually
known, this being an example as to why. I think special casing
this symbol as a known one that LLVM can emit which should not
have it's visbility de-escalated should be fine given how
seldom this pattern of defining an undefined symbol to get
initilization code pulled in is. From a quick grep,
__llvm_profile_runtime is the only symbol that rustc does this
for.
[1] 0265a3e93b/compiler/rustc_codegen_ssa/src/back/linker.rs (L598)
This ensures that the error is printed even for unused variables,
as well as unifying the handling between the LLVM and GCC backends.
This also fixes unusual behavior around exported Rust-defined variables
with linkage attributes. With the previous behavior, it appears to be
impossible to define such a variable such that it can actually be imported
and used by another crate. This is because on the importing side, the
variable is required to be a pointer, but on the exporting side, the
type checker rejects static variables of pointer type because they do
not implement `Sync`. Even if it were possible to import such a type, it
appears that code generation on the importing side would add an unexpected
additional level of pointer indirection, which would break type safety.
This highlighted that the semantics of linkage on Rust-defined variables
is different to linkage on foreign items. As such, we now model the
difference with two different codegen attributes: linkage for Rust-defined
variables, and import_linkage for foreign items.
This change gives semantics to the test
src/test/ui/linkage-attr/auxiliary/def_illtyped_external.rs which was
previously expected to fail to compile. Therefore, convert it into a
test that is expected to successfully compile.
The update to the GCC backend is speculative and untested.
