core: Support variety of atomic widths in width-agnostic functions
Before this change, the following functions and macros were annotated with `#[cfg(target_has_atomic = "8")]` or
`#[cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = "8")]`:
* `atomic_int`
* `strongest_failure_ordering`
* `atomic_swap`
* `atomic_add`
* `atomic_sub`
* `atomic_compare_exchange`
* `atomic_compare_exchange_weak`
* `atomic_and`
* `atomic_nand`
* `atomic_or`
* `atomic_xor`
* `atomic_max`
* `atomic_min`
* `atomic_umax`
* `atomic_umin`
However, none of those functions and macros actually depend on 8-bit width and they are needed for all atomic widths (16-bit, 32-bit, 64-bit etc.). Some targets might not support 8-bit atomics (i.e. BPF, if we would enable atomic CAS for it).
This change fixes that by removing the `"8"` argument from annotations, which results in accepting the whole variety of widths.
Fixes#106845Fixes#106795
Signed-off-by: Michal Rostecki <vadorovsky@gmail.com>
Sync rustc_codegen_cranelift
For cg_clif itself there have been a couple of bug fixes since the last sync, a Cranelift update and implemented all remaining simd platform intrinsics used by `std::simd`. (`std::arch` still misses a lot though) Most of the diff is from reworking of the cg_clif build system though.
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` label +A-codegen +A-cranelift +T-compiler
make `output_filenames` a real query
part of #105462
This may be a perf regression and is not obviously the right way forward. We may store this information in the resolver after freezing it for example.
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106904 (Preserve split DWARF files when building archives.)
- #106971 (Handle diagnostics customization on the fluent side (for one specific diagnostic))
- #106978 (Migrate mir_build's borrow conflicts)
- #107150 (`ty::tls` cleanups)
- #107168 (Use a type-alias-impl-trait in `ObligationForest`)
- #107189 (Encode info for Adt in a single place.)
- #107322 (Custom mir: Add support for some remaining, easy to support constructs)
- #107323 (Disable ConstGoto opt in cleanup blocks)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Disable ConstGoto opt in cleanup blocks
Fixes#107315 .
There is probably a smaller hammer that we could use here, but none that is super obviously correct. We can always revisit this in the future.
Could not add a test because custom mir does not support cleanup blocks. However, did check that the fallible_iterator crate no longer ICEs with the other PR cherry picked.
r? `@tmiasko`
Custom mir: Add support for some remaining, easy to support constructs
Some documentation for previous changes and support for `Deinit`, checked binops, len, and array repetition
r? ```@oli-obk``` or ```@tmiasko```
`ty::tls` cleanups
Pull it out into a separate file, make the conditional compilation more obvious and give the internal functions better names.
Pulled out of #106311
r? cjgillot
Migrate mir_build's borrow conflicts
This also changes the error message slightly, for two reasons:
- I'm not a fan of saying "value borrowed, by `x`, here"
- it simplifies the error implementation significantly.
Move format_args!() into AST (and expand it during AST lowering)
Implements https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/541
This moves FormatArgs from rustc_builtin_macros to rustc_ast_lowering. For now, the end result is the same. But this allows for future changes to do smarter things with format_args!(). It also allows Clippy to directly access the ast::FormatArgs, making things a lot easier.
This change turns the format args types into lang items. The builtin macro used to refer to them by their path. After this change, the path is no longer relevant, making it easier to make changes in `core`.
This updates clippy to use the new language items, but this doesn't yet make clippy use the ast::FormatArgs structure that's now available. That should be done after this is merged.
Use `can_eq` to compare types for default assoc type error
This correctly handles inference variables like `{integer}`. I had to move all of this `note_and_explain` code to `rustc_infer`, it made no sense for it to be in `rustc_middle` anyways.
The commits are reviewed separately.
Fixes#106968
remove unnecessary check for opaque types
this isn't needed and may hide some errors.
after analysis there are no opaque types so it's a noop anyways
before analysis there are opaque types but due to `Reveal::UserFacing` we don't reveal them. `is_subtype` simply discards the opaque type constraints as these will get checked again during mir borrowck.
r? types
want to land this after the beta-cutoff as mir validator changes are apparently pretty scary
Append .dwp to the binary filename instead of replacing the existing extension.
gdb et al. expect to find the dwp file at `<binary>`.dwp, even if <binary> already has an extension (e.g. libfoo.so's dwp is expected to be at libfoo.so.dwp).
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #106407 (Improve proc macro attribute diagnostics)
- #106960 (Teach parser to understand fake anonymous enum syntax)
- #107085 (Custom MIR: Support binary and unary operations)
- #107086 (Print PID holding bootstrap build lock on Linux)
- #107175 (Fix escaping inference var ICE in `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type`)
- #107204 (suggest qualifying bare associated constants)
- #107248 (abi: add AddressSpace field to Primitive::Pointer )
- #107272 (Implement ObjectSafe and WF in the new solver)
- #107285 (Implement `Generator` and `Future` in the new solver)
- #107286 (ICE in new solver if we see an inference variable)
- #107313 (Add Style Team Triagebot config)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
ICE in new solver if we see an inference variable
By construction, we do not expect to see any `ty::Infer(ty::TyVar(_))` inference types in the solver (we treat this as ambiguous, since we need to be able to structurally resolve the self type at least one layer to assemble candidates for it). Additionally, since we're doing no freshening, we also don't expect to see any fresh vars of any kind in the solver.
Let's make that an ICE so we can catch any mistakes.
When #107282 lands, we should also ICE there too if we see a non-int/float infer.
r? `@lcnr`
abi: add AddressSpace field to Primitive::Pointer
...and remove it from `PointeeInfo`, which isn't meant for this.
There are still various places (marked with FIXMEs) that assume all pointers
have the same size and alignment. Fixing this requires parsing non-default
address spaces in the data layout string (and various other changes),
which will be done in a followup.
(That is, if it's actually worth it to support multiple different pointer sizes.
There is a lot of code that would be affected by that.)
Fixes#106367
r? ``@oli-obk``
cc ``@Patryk27``
Fix escaping inference var ICE in `point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type`
Fixes#107158
`point_at_expr_source_of_inferred_type` uses `lookup_probe` to adjust the self type of a method receiver -- but that method returns inference variables from inside a probe. That means that the ty vars are no longer valid, so we can't use any infcx methods on them.
Also, pass some extra span info to hack a quick solution to bad labels, resulting in this diagnostic improvement:
```rust
fn example2() {
let mut x = vec![1];
x.push("");
}
```
```diff
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:5:12
|
5 | x.push("");
| ---- ^^
| | |
| | expected integer, found `&str`
- | | this is of type `&'static str`, which causes `x` to be inferred as `Vec<{integer}>`
| arguments to this method are incorrect
```
(since that "which causes `x` to be inferred as `Vec<{integer}>` part is wrong)
r? `@estebank`
(we really should make this code better in general, cc #106590, but that's a bit bigger issue that needs some more thinking about)
Custom MIR: Support binary and unary operations
Lower binary and unary operations directly to corresponding unchecked MIR
operations. Ultimately this might not be syntax we want, but it allows for
experimentation in the meantime.
r? ````@oli-obk```` ````@JakobDegen````
Teach parser to understand fake anonymous enum syntax
Parse `Ty | OtherTy` in function argument and return types.
Parse type ascription in top level patterns.
Minimally address #100741.
InstCombine away intrinsic validity assertions
This optimization (currently) fires 246 times on the standard library. It seems to fire hardly at all on the big crates in the benchmark suite. Interesting.
Delete `SimplifyArmIdentity` and `SimplifyBranchSame` mir opts
I had attempted to fix the first of these opts in #94177 . However, despite that PR already being a full re-write, it still did not fix some of the core soundness issues. The optimizations that are attempted here are likely to be desirable, but I do not expect any of the currently written code to survive into a sound implementation. Deleting the code keeps us from having to maintain the passes in the meantime.
Closes#77359 , closes#72800 , closes#78628
r? ```@cjgillot```
Add hint for missing lifetime bound on trait object when type alias is used
Fix issue #103582.
The problem: When a type alias is used to specify the return type of the method in a trait impl, the suggestion for fixing the problem of "missing lifetime bound on trait object" of the trait impl will not be created. The issue caused by the code which searches for the return trait objects when constructing the hint suggestion is not able to find the trait objects since they are specified in the type alias path instead of the return path of the trait impl.
The solution: Trace the trait objects in the type alias path and provide them along with the alias span to generate the suggestion in case the type alias is used in return type of the method in the trait impl.
use `LocalDefId` instead of `HirId` in trait resolution to simplify the obligation clause resolution
This commit introduces a refactoring suggested by `@lcnr` to simplify the obligation clause resolution.
This is just the first PR that introduces a type of refactoring, but others PRs will follow this to introduce name changing to change from the variable name from `body_id` to something else.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/104827
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
`@rustbot` r? `@lcnr`
Add suggestion to remove if in let..else block
Adds an additional hint to failures where we encounter an else keyword while we're parsing an if-let expression.
This is likely that the user has accidentally mixed if-let and let..else together.
Fixes#103791.
