feat: Allow navigation targets to be duplicated when the focus range lies in the macro definition site
Basically if a name of an item originates from the macro definition we now point to that as well as the creating macro call.
Big diff because I also made `FileId`s field private due to some debugging I had to do (having a searchable constructor makes things easier).
Add support for making lib features internal
We have the notion of an "internal" lang feature: a feature that is never intended to be stabilized, and using which can cause ICEs and other issues without that being considered a bug.
This extends that idea to lib features as well. It is an alternative to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115623: instead of using an attribute to declare lib features internal, we simply do this based on the name. Everything ending in `_internals` or `_internal` is considered internal.
Then we rename `core_intrinsics` to `core_intrinsics_internal`, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/115597.
fix: Insert fn call parens only if the parens inserted around field name
Fixes#16014.
Sorry I missed it in previous PR. I've added a test as level to prevent regressions again.
Give any suggestions to improve the test if anything.
internal: Don't explicitly warn against `semicolon_in_expressions_from_macros`
This has been warn-by-default for two years now and has already been added to the future-incompat lints in 1.68.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/79813 for the tracking issue.
TokenMap -> SpanMap rewrite
Opening early so I can have an overview over the full diff more easily, still very unfinished and lots of work to be done.
The gist of what this PR does is move away from assigning IDs to tokens in arguments and expansions and instead gives the subtrees the text ranges they are sourced from (made relative to some item for incrementality). This means we now only have a single map per expension, opposed to map for expansion and arguments.
A few of the things that are not done yet (in arbitrary order):
- [x] generally clean up the current mess
- [x] proc-macros, have been completely ignored so far
- [x] syntax fixups, has been commented out for the time being needs to be rewritten on top of some marker SyntaxContextId
- [x] macro invocation syntax contexts are not properly passed around yet, so $crate hygiene does not work in all cases (but most)
- [x] builtin macros do not set spans properly, $crate basically does not work with them rn (which we use)
~~- [ ] remove all uses of dummy spans (or if that does not work, change the dummy entries for dummy spans so that tests will not silently pass due to havin a file id for the dummy file)~~
- [x] de-queryfy `macro_expand`, the sole caller of it is `parse_macro_expansion`, and both of these are lru-cached with the same limit so having it be a query is pointless
- [x] docs and more docs
- [x] fix eager macro spans and other stuff
- [x] simplify include! handling
- [x] Figure out how to undo the sudden `()` expression wrapping in expansions / alternatively prioritize getting invisible delimiters working again
- [x] Simplify InFile stuff and HirFIleId extensions
~~- [ ] span crate containing all the file ids, span stuff, ast ids. Then remove the dependency injection generics from tt and mbe~~
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/10300
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/15685
Implement completion for the callable fields.
Fixes#14656
PR is opened with basic changes. It could be improved by having a new `SymbolKind` for the callable fields and implementing a separate render function similar to the `render_method` for the new `SymbolKind`.
It could also be done without any changes to the `SymbolKind` of course, have the new function called based on the type of field.
I prefer the former method.
Please give any thoughts or changes you think is appropriate for this method. I could start working on that in this same PR.
chore: remove unused `PhantomData`
This PR removes an unused `PhantomData` in `FileItemTreeId`.
*Note:* I am not sure how this should be implemented, maybe as a type instead of a wrapper struct? I'd be happy to do so if needed 👍
Improve error handling for top-level `let` statements
This commit addresses the issue of excessive and unrelated errors generated by top-level `let` statements. Now, only a single error is produced, indicating that `let` statements are invalid at the top level.
---
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/14963.
While I'm not really sure if handling a particular case in a special manner is appropriate, it would be good to suppress the excessive number of annoying and unrelated errors.
This commit addresses the issue of excessive and unrelated errors
generated by top-level `let` statements. Now, only a single error is
produced, indicating that `let` statements are invalid at the top level.
