Update AsmArgs field visibility for rustfmt
To more easily allow rustfmt to format the ``asm!`` macro as specified in
rust-dev-tools/fmt-rfcs#152 certain fields are made public.
r? ```@calebcartwright```
Eliminate "boxed" wording in `std::error::Error` documentation
In commit 29403ee, documentation for the methods on `std::any::Any` was
modified so that they referred to the concrete value behind the trait
object as the "inner" value. This is a more accurate wording than
"boxed": while putting trait objects inside boxes is arguably the most
common use, they can also be placed behind other pointer types like
`&mut` or `std::sync::Arc`.
This commit does the same documentation changes for `std::error::Error`.
Add note about upstream commit musl-patch-configure.diff is derived from
The patch landed in upstream over the weekend so I'm adding a note so we can more easily track when our patch file can be removed.
Improve documentation for File::options to give a more likely example
`File::options().read(true).open(...)` is equivalent to just
`File::open`. Change the example to set the `append` flag instead, and
then change the filename to something more likely to be written in
append mode.
rustdoc: Display "private fields" instead of "fields omitted"
Also:
* Always use `/* */` block comments
* Use the same message everywhere, rather than sometimes prefixing
with "some"
When I first read rustdoc docs, I was confused why the fields were being
omitted. It was only later that I realized it was because they were
private. It's also always bothered me that rustdoc sometimes uses `//`
and sometimes uses `/*` comments for these messages, so this change
makes them all use `/*`.
Technically, I think fields can be omitted if they are public but
`doc(hidden)` too, but `doc(hidden)` is analogous to privacy. It's
really just used to emulate "doc privacy" when -- because of technical
limitations -- an item has to be public. So I think it's fine to include
this under the category of "private fields".
r? ```@jsha```
Error when selected impl is not const in constck
Catches bad things when checking a `default_method_body_is_const` body, such as:
```rust
self.map(/* .. */).is_sorted();
```
When `Map` does not yet have a `const` `impl` for `Iterator`.
r? ```@oli-obk```
Store a `Symbol` instead of an `Ident` in `VariantDef`/`FieldDef`
The field is also renamed from `ident` to `name`. In most cases,
we don't actually need the `Span`. A new `ident` method is added
to `VariantDef` and `FieldDef`, which constructs the full `Ident`
using `tcx.def_ident_span()`. This method is used in the cases
where we actually need an `Ident`.
This makes incremental compilation properly track changes
to the `Span`, without all of the invalidations caused by storing
a `Span` directly via an `Ident`.
Actually instantiate the opaque type when checking bounds
Before this change, `instantiate_opaque_types` was a no-op, because it only works relative to the defined opaque type inference anchor. If it is a no-op, the for loop will not actually have anything to iterate over, and thus nothing is checked at all.
Improve documentation for `borrowed-box` lint
fixes#8161
Updates documentation to elaborate more on how removing Box from a function parameter can generalize the function.
changelog: none
This covers:
impl<T> MaybeUninit<T> {
pub unsafe fn assume_init_read(&self) -> T { ... }
pub unsafe fn assume_init_drop(&mut self) { ... }
}
It does not cover the const-ness of `write` under
`const_maybe_uninit_write` nor the const-ness of
`assume_init_read` (this commit adds
`const_maybe_uninit_assume_init_read` for that).
FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/63567#issuecomment-958590287.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
The field is also renamed from `ident` to `name. In most cases,
we don't actually need the `Span`. A new `ident` method is added
to `VariantDef` and `FieldDef`, which constructs the full `Ident`
using `tcx.def_ident_span()`. This method is used in the cases
where we actually need an `Ident`.
This makes incremental compilation properly track changes
to the `Span`, without all of the invalidations caused by storing
a `Span` directly via an `Ident`.
The field is also renamed from `ident` to `name. In most cases,
we don't actually need the `Span`. A new `ident` method is added
to `VariantDef` and `FieldDef`, which constructs the full `Ident`
using `tcx.def_ident_span()`. This method is used in the cases
where we actually need an `Ident`.
This makes incremental compilation properly track changes
to the `Span`, without all of the invalidations caused by storing
a `Span` directly via an `Ident`.
Replace usages of vec![].into_iter with [].into_iter
`[].into_iter` is idiomatic over `vec![].into_iter` because its simpler and faster (unless the vec is optimized away in which case it would be the same)
So we should change all the implementation, documentation and tests to use it.
I skipped:
* `src/tools` - Those are copied in from upstream
* `src/test/ui` - Hard to tell if `vec![].into_iter` was used intentionally or not here and not much benefit to changing it.
* any case where `vec![].into_iter` was used because we specifically needed a `Vec::IntoIter<T>`
* any case where it looked like we were intentionally using `vec![].into_iter` to test it.
Downgrade mutex_atomic to nursery
See #1516 and #4295.
There are suggestions about removing this lint from the default warned lints in both issues.
Also, [`mutex_integer`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#mutex_integer) lint that has the same problems as this lint is in `nursery` group.
changelog: Moved [`mutex_atomic`] to `nursery`
These closures were quite complex and part of a quite complex function.
The fact that they are closures makes mistakes likely when refactoring.
For example, earlier, I meant to use `resolved`, an argument of the
closure, but I instead typed `res`, which captured a local variable and
caused a subtle bug that led to a confusing test failure.
Extracting them as functions makes the code easier to understand and
refactor.
This currently calls `std` a "crate" in one part of the message and a
"module" in another part. The next commits fix this so it says "crate"
in both places.
