Improve spans for indexing expressions
fixes#114388
Indexing is similar to method calls in having an arbitrary left-hand-side and then something on the right, which is the main part of the expression. Method calls already have a span for that right part, but indexing does not. This means that long method chains that use indexing have really bad spans, especially when the indexing panics and that span in coverted into a panic location.
This does the same thing as method calls for the AST and HIR, storing an extra span which is then put into the `fn_span` field in THIR.
r? compiler-errors
[rustc_span][perf] Remove unnecessary string joins and allocs.
Comparing vectors of string parts yields the same result but avoids unnecessary `join` and potential allocation for resulting `String`. This code is cold so it's unlikely to have any measurable impact, but considering but since it's also simpler, why not? :)
Lots of tiny incremental simplifications of `EmitterWriter` internals
ignore the first commit, it's https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114088 squashed and rebased, but it's needed to use to use `derive_setters`, as they need a newer `syn` version.
Then this PR starts out with removing many arguments that are almost always defaulted to `None` or `false` and replace them with builder methods that can set these fields in the few cases that want to set them.
After that it's one commit after the other that removes or merges things until everything becomes some very simple trait objects
Previously, clicking 'rust-analyzer' would stop the server
entirely. This was easy to do accidentally, and then the user has to
wait for the server to start up again.
```
error[E0599]: no method named `x` found for struct `Pin<&S>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/arbitrary_self_type_mut_difference.rs:11:18
|
LL | Pin::new(&S).x();
| ^ help: there is a method with a similar name: `y`
|
note: method is available for `Pin<&mut S>`
--> $DIR/arbitrary_self_type_mut_difference.rs:6:5
|
LL | fn x(self: Pin<&mut Self>) {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
Related to #57994, as one of the presented cases can lead to code like
this.
Indexing is similar to method calls in having an arbitrary
left-hand-side and then something on the right, which is the main part
of the expression. Method calls already have a span for that right part,
but indexing does not. This means that long method chains that use
indexing have really bad spans, especially when the indexing panics and
that span in coverted into a panic location.
This does the same thing as method calls for the AST and HIR, storing an
extra span which is then put into the `fn_span` field in THIR.
Rework upcasting confirmation to support upcasting to fewer projections in target bounds
This PR implements a modified trait upcasting algorithm that is resilient to changes in the number of associated types in the bounds of the source and target trait objects.
It does this by equating each bound of the target trait ref individually against the bounds of the source trait ref, rather than doing them all together by constructing a new trait object.
#### The new way we do trait upcasting confirmation
1. Equate the target trait object's principal trait ref with one of the supertraits of the source trait object's principal.
fdcab310b2/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs (L2509-L2525)
2. Make sure that every auto trait in the *target* trait object is present in the source trait ref's bounds.
fdcab310b2/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs (L2559-L2562)
3. For each projection in the *target* trait object, make sure there is exactly one projection that equates with it in the source trait ref's bound. If there is more than one, bail with ambiguity.
fdcab310b2/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/mod.rs (L2526-L2557)
* Since there may be more than one that applies, we probe first to check that there is exactly one, then we equate it outside of a probe once we know that it's unique.
4. Make sure the lifetime of the source trait object outlives the lifetime of the target.
<details>
<summary>Meanwhile, this is how we used to do upcasting:</summary>
1. For each supertrait of the source trait object, take that supertrait, append the source object's projection bounds, and the *target* trait object's auto trait bounds, and make this into a new object type:
d12c6e947c/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs (L915-L929)
2. Then equate it with the target trait object:
d12c6e947c/compiler/rustc_trait_selection/src/traits/select/confirmation.rs (L936)
This will be a type mismatch if the target trait object has fewer projection bounds, since we compare the bounds structurally in relate:
d12c6e947c/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/relate.rs (L696-L698)
</details>
Fixes#114035
Also fixes#114113, because I added a normalize call in the old solver.
r? types
bootstrap: config: fix version comparison bug
Rust requires a previous version of Rust to build, such as the current version, or the previous version. However, the version comparison logic did not take patch releases into consideration when doing the version comparison for the current branch, e.g. Rust 1.71.1 could not be built by Rust 1.71.0 because it is neither an exact version match, or the previous version.
Adjust the version comparison logic to tolerate mismatches in the patch version.
resolve before canonicalization in new solver, ICE if unresolved
Fold the values with a resolver before canonicalization instead of making it happen within canonicalization.
This allows us to filter trivial region constraints from the external constraints.
r? ``@lcnr``
Perform OpaqueCast field projection on HIR, too.
fixes#105819
This is necessary for closure captures in 2021 edition, as they capture individual fields, not the full mentioned variables. So it may try to capture a field of an opaque (because the hidden type is known to be something with a field).
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99806 for when and why we added OpaqueCast to MIR.
cg_llvm: stop identifying ADTs in LLVM IR
This is an extension of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94107. It may be a minor perf win.
Fixes#96242.
Now that we use opaque pointers, ADTs can no longer be recursive, so we
do not need to name them. Previously, this would be necessary if you had
a struct like
```rs
struct Foo(Box<Foo>, u64, u64);
```
which would be represented with something like
```ll
%Foo = type { %Foo*, i64, i64 }
```
which is now just
```ll
{ ptr, i64, i64 }
```
r? `@tmiasko`
