Some features of rust-analyzer requires support for custom commands on
the client side. Specifically, hover & code lens need this.
Stock LSP doesn't have a way for the server to know which client-side
commands are available. For that reason, we historically were just
sending the commands, not worrying whether the client supports then or
not.
That's not really great though, so in this PR we add infrastructure for
the client to explicitly opt-into custom commands, via `extensions`
field of the ClientCapabilities.
To preserve backwards compatability, if the client doesn't set the
field, we assume that it does support all custom commands. In the
future, we'll start treating that case as if the client doesn't support
commands.
So, if you maintain a rust-analyzer client and implement
`rust-analyzer/runSingle` and such, please also advertise this via a
capability.
9731: feat: Add `replace_char_with_string` assist r=Veykril a=Veykril
Adds the counterpart for the `replace_string_with_char` assist and fixes the assist not escaping the `'` in the string `"'"` when transforming that to a char.
bors r+
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
9700: fix: Remove the legacy macro scoping hack r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
This stops prepending `self::` to single-ident macro paths, resolving even legacy-scoped macros using the fixed-point algorithm. This is not correct, but a lot easier than fixing this properly (which involves pushing a new scope for every macro definition and invocation).
This allows resolution of macros from the prelude, fixing https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/9687.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
9693: feat: Add the Hover Range capability which enables showing the type of an expression r=matklad a=alexfertel
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/389
This PR extends the `textDocument/hover` method to allow getting the type of an expression. It looks like this:
Edit: One thing I noticed is that when hovering a selection that includes a macro it doesn't work, so maybe this would need a follow-up issue discussing what problem that may have.
(PS: What a great project! I am learning a lot! 🚀)
Co-authored-by: Alexander Gonzalez <alexfertel97@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Alexander González <alexfertel97@gmail.com>
9558: Do not erase Cargo diagnostics from the closed documents r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6850
The LSP specification at https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specifications/specification-3-14/#textDocument_publishDiagnostics states that
> Diagnostics notification are sent from the server to the client to signal results of validation runs.
>
> Diagnostics are “owned” by the server so it is the server’s responsibility to clear them if necessary. The following rule is used for VS Code servers that generate diagnostics:
>
> * if a language is single file only (for example HTML) then diagnostics are cleared by the server when the file is closed.
> * if a language has a project system (for example C#) diagnostics are not cleared when a file closes. When a project is opened all diagnostics for all files are recomputed (or read from a cache).
>
> When a file changes it is the server’s responsibility to re-compute diagnostics and push them to the client. If the computed set is empty it has to push the empty array to clear former diagnostics. Newly pushed diagnostics always replace previously pushed diagnostics. There is no merging that happens on the client side.
So for projects we should not clear any diagnostics from cargo/json projects.
Our "standalone file" mode is in a way a project too, with sysroot attached and a potential support for dynamic standalone files.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
9593: fix: Adding remove_unused_param for method and fixing same for assoc func r=matklad a=feniljain
Solves #9571
Co-authored-by: vi_mi <fenil.jain2018@vitstudent.ac.in>
9681: Respect `#[doc(hidden)]` in dot-completion r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
This adds `CompletionContext::is_visible` as a convenience method that checks visibility, presence of `doc(hidden)`, and whether the completed item is in the same crate as the completion site or not. We only complete `doc(hidden)` items from the same crate.
This doesn't yet work for *all* completions: `qualified_path` completions use `Module::scope` and `ScopeDef`, which doesn't work with this.
Part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/7718
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
9674: fix: Fix pattern name resolution when name is also occupied in type namespace r=flodiebold a=jonas-schievink
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/8694
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
9634: minor update to excludeDirs doc r=lnicola a=dae
I saw reference to globs in #7755, but it doesn't look like they're
actually supported, and I had to dig through the source to discover
that the folders are relative to the workspace root. Further digging
was required to get VS Code from hanging for long periods trying to
watch giant Bazel folders that had already been excluded from Rust
Analyzer. Hopefully this tweak will save others the confusion :-)
Co-authored-by: Damien Elmes <gpg@ankiweb.net>
Co-authored-by: Damien Elmes <dae@users.noreply.github.com>
9453: Add first-class limits. r=matklad,lnicola a=rbartlensky
Partially fixes#9286.
This introduces a new `Limits` structure which is passed as an input
to `SourceDatabase`. This makes limits accessible almost everywhere in
the code, since most places have a database in scope.
One downside of this approach is that whenever you query limits, you
essentially do an `Arc::clone` which is less than ideal.
Let me know if I missed anything, or would like me to take a different approach!
Co-authored-by: Robert Bartlensky <bartlensky.robert@gmail.com>
