Passing `--pretty flowgraph=<NODEID>` makes rustc print a control flow graph.
In pratice, you will also need to pass the additional option:
`-o <FILE>` to emit output to a `.dot` file for graphviz.
(You can only print the flow-graph for a particular block in the AST.)
----
An interesting implementation detail is the way the code puts both the
node index (`cfg::CFGIndex`) and a reference to the payload
(`cfg::CFGNode`) into the single `Node` type that is used for
labelling and walking the graph. I had once mistakenly thought that I
only wanted the `cfg::CFGNode`, but for labelling, you really want the
cfg index too, rather than e.g. trying to use the `ast::NodeId` as the
label (which breaks down e.g. due to `ast::DUMMY_NODE_ID`).
----
As a drive-by fix, I had to fix `rustc::middle::cfg::construct`
interface to reflect changes that have happened on the master branch
while I was getting this integrated into the compiler. (The next
commit actually adds tests of the `--pretty flowgraph` functionality,
so that should ensure that the `rustc::middle::cfg` code does not go
stale again.)
The core library in theory has 0 dependencies, but in practice it has some in
order for it to be efficient. These dependencies are in the form of the basic
memory operations provided by libc traditionally, such as memset, memcmp, etc.
These functions are trivial to implement and themselves have 0 dependencies.
This commit adds a new crate, librlibc, which will serve the purpose of
providing these dependencies. The crate is never linked to by default, but is
available to be linked to by downstream consumers. Normally these functions are
provided by the system libc, but in other freestanding contexts a libc may not
be available. In these cases, librlibc will suffice for enabling execution with
libcore.
cc #10116
The current suite of benchmarks for the standard distribution take a significant
amount of time to run, but it's unclear whether we're gaining any benefit from
running them. Some specific pain points:
* No one is looking at the data generated by the benchmarks. We have no graphs
or analysis of what's happening, so all the data is largely being cast into
the void.
* No benchmark has ever uncovered a bug, they have always run successfully.
* Benchmarks not only take a significant amount of time to run, but also take a
significant amount of time to compile. I don't think we should mitigate this
for now because it's useful to ensure that they do indeed still compile.
This commit disables --bench test runs by default as part of `make check`,
flipping the NO_BENCH environment variable to a PLEASE_BENCH variable which will
manually enable benchmarking. If and when a dedicated bot is set up for
benchmarking, this flag can be enabled on that bot.
There's no need to include this specific flag just for android. We can
already deal with what it tries to solve by using -C linker=/path/to/cc
and -C ar=/path/to/ar. The Makefiles for rustc already set this up when
we're crosscompiling.
I did add the flag to compiletest though so it can find gdb. Though, I'm
pretty sure we don't run debuginfo tests on android anyways right now.
[breaking-change]
This adds a `std::rt::heap` module with a nice allocator API. It's a
step towards fixing #13094 and is a starting point for working on a
generic allocator trait.
The revision used for the jemalloc submodule is the stable 3.6.0 release.
Closes#11807
This code does not belong in libstd, and rather belongs in a dedicated crate. In
the future, the syntax::ext::format module should move to the fmt_macros crate
(hence the name of the crate), but for now the fmt_macros crate will only
contain the format string parser.
The entire fmt_macros crate is marked #[experimental] because it is not meant
for general consumption, only the format!() interface is officially supported,
not the internals.
This is a breaking change for anyone using the internals of std::fmt::parse.
Some of the flags have moved to std::fmt::rt, while the actual parsing support
has all moved to the fmt_macros library.
[breaking-change]
This code does not belong in libstd, and rather belongs in a dedicated crate. In
the future, the syntax::ext::format module should move to the fmt_macros crate
(hence the name of the crate), but for now the fmt_macros crate will only
contain the format string parser.
The entire fmt_macros crate is marked #[experimental] because it is not meant
for general consumption, only the format!() interface is officially supported,
not the internals.
This is a breaking change for anyone using the internals of std::fmt::parse.
Some of the flags have moved to std::fmt::rt, while the actual parsing support
has all moved to the fmt_macros library.
[breaking-change]
This pull request contains preparations for adding LLDB autotests:
+ the debuginfo tests are split into debuginfo-gdb and debuginfo-lldb
+ the `compiletest` tool is updated to support the debuginfo-lldb mode
+ tests.mk is modified to provide debuginfo-gdb and debuginfo-lldb make targets
+ GDB test cases are moved from `src/test/debug-info` to `src/test/debuginfo-gdb`
+ configure will now look for LLDB and set the appropriate CFG variables
+ the `lldb_batchmode.py` script is added to `src/etc`. It emulates GDB's batch mode
The LLDB autotests themselves are not part of this PR. Those will probable require some manual work on the test bots to make them work for the first time. Better to get these unproblematic preliminaries out of the way in a separate step.
This is the second step in implementing #13851. This PR cannot currently land until a snapshot exists with #13892, but I imagine that this review will take longer.
This PR refactors a large amount of functionality outside of the standard library into a new library, libcore. This new library has 0 dependencies (in theory). In practice, this library currently depends on these symbols being available:
* `rust_begin_unwind` and `rust_fail_bounds_check` - These are the two entry points of failure in libcore. The symbols are provided by libstd currently. In the future (see the bullets on #13851) this will be officially supported with nice error mesages. Additionally, there will only be one failure entry point once `std::fmt` migrates to libcore.
* `memcpy` - This is often generated by LLVM. This is also quite trivial to implement for any platform, so I'm not too worried about this.
* `memcmp` - This is required for comparing strings. This function is quite common *everywhere*, so I don't feel to bad about relying on a consumer of libcore to define it.
* `malloc` and `free` - This is quite unfortunate, and is a temporary stopgap until we deal with the `~` situation. More details can be found in the module `core::should_not_exist`
* `fmod` and `fmodf` - These exist because the `Rem` trait is defined in libcore, so the `Rem` implementation for floats must also be defined in libcore. I imagine that any platform using floating-point modulus will have these symbols anyway, and otherwise they will be optimized out.
* `fdim` and `fdimf` - Like `fmod`, these are from the `Signed` trait being defined in libcore. I don't expect this to be much of a problem
These dependencies all "Just Work" for now because libcore only exists as an rlib, not as a dylib.
The commits themselves are organized to show that the overall diff of this extraction is not all that large. Most modules were able to be moved with very few modifications. The primary module left out of this iteration is `std::fmt`. I plan on migrating the `fmt` module to libcore, but I chose to not do so at this time because it had implications on the `Writer` trait that I wanted to deal with in isolation. There are a few breaking changes in these commits, but they are fairly minor, and are all labeled with `[breaking-change]`.
The nastiest parts of this movement come up with `~[T]` and `~str` being language-defined types today. I believe that much of this nastiness will get better over time as we migrate towards `Vec<T>` and `Str` (or whatever the types will be named). There will likely always be some extension traits, but the situation won't be as bad as it is today.
Known deficiencies:
* rustdoc will get worse in terms of readability. This is the next issue I will tackle as part of #13851. If others think that the rustdoc change should happen first, I can also table this to fix rustdoc first.
* The compiler reveals that all these types are reexports via error messages like `core::option::Option`. This is filed as #13065, and I believe that issue would have a higher priority now. I do not currently plan on fixing that as part of #13851. If others believe that this issue should be fixed, I can also place it on the roadmap for #13851.
I recommend viewing these changes on a commit-by-commit basis. The overall change is likely too overwhelming to take in.
Compile-fail tests for syntax extensions belong in this suite which has correct
dependencies on all artifacts rather than just the target artifacts.
Closes#13818
This primary fix brought on by this upgrade is the proper matching of the ```
and ~~~ doc blocks. This also moves hoedown to a git submodule rather than a
bundled repository.
Additionally, hoedown is stricter about code blocks, so this ended up fixing a
lot of invalid code blocks (ending with " ```" instead of "```", or ending with
"~~~~" instead of "~~~").
Closes#12776
These fonts were moved into place by rust's makefiles, but rustdoc is widely
used outside of rustc itself. This moves the fonts into the rustdoc binary,
similarly to the other static assets, and writes them to the output location
whenever rustdoc generates documentation.
Closes#13593Closes#13787
There is currently not much precedent for target crates requiring syntax
extensions to compile their test versions. This dependency is possible, but
can't be encoded through the normal means of DEPS_regex because it is a
test-only dependency and it must be a *host* dependency (it's a syntax
extension).
Closes#13844
Compile-fail tests for syntax extensions belong in this suite which has correct
dependencies on all artifacts rather than just the target artifacts.
Closes#13818
This allows the use of syntax extensions when cross-compiling (fixing #12102). It does this by encoding the target triple in the crate metadata and checking it when searching for files. Currently the crate triple must match the host triple when there is a macro_registrar_fn, it must match the target triple when linking, and can match either when only macro_rules! macros are used.
due to carelessness, this is pretty much a duplicate of https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/13450.
This adds the target triple to the crate metadata.
When searching for a crate the phase (link, syntax) is taken into account.
During link phase only crates matching the target triple are considered.
During syntax phase, either the target or host triple will be accepted, unless
the crate defines a macro_registrar, in which case only the host triple will
match.
Instead of passing through CC which may have things like ccache and other
arguments (when using clang) this commit filters out the necessary arguments
from CC to pass the right linker to rustc.
Closes#13562
This is a bit of an interesting upgrade to LLVM. Upstream LLVM has started using C++11 features, so they require a C++11 compiler to build. I've updated all the bots to have a C++11 compiler, and they appear to be building LLVM successfully:
* Linux bots - I added gcc/g++ 4.7 (good enough)
* Android bots - same as the linux ones
* Mac bots - I installed the most recent command line tools for Lion which gives us clang 3.2, but LLVM wouldn't build unless it was explicitly asked to link to `libc++` instead of `libstdc++`. This involved tweaking `mklldeps.py` and the `configure` script to get things to work out
* Windows bots - mingw-w64 has gcc 4.8.1 which is sufficient for building LLVM (hurray!)
* BSD bots - I updated FreeBSD to 10.0 which brought with it a relevant version of clang.
The largest fallout I've seen so far is that the test suite doesn't work at all on FreeBSD 10. We've already stopped gating on FreeBSD due to #13427 (we used to be on freebsd 9), so I don't think this puts us in too bad of a situation. I will continue to attempt to fix FreeBSD and the breakage on there.
The LLVM update brings with it all of the recently upstreamed LLVM patches. We only have one local patch now which is just an optimization, and isn't required to use upstream LLVM. I want to maintain compatibility with LLVM 3.3 and 3.4 while we can, and this upgrade is keeping us up to date with the 3.5 release. Once 3.5 is release we will in theory no longer require a bundled LLVM.
The goal of the snapshot bots is to produce binaries which can run in as many
locations as possible. Currently we build on Centos 6 for this reason, but with
LLVM's update to C++11, this reduces the number of platforms that we could
possibly run on.
This adds a --enable-llvm-static-stdcpp option to the ./configure script for
Rust which will enable building a librustc with a static dependence on
libstdc++. This normally isn't necessary, but this option can be used on the
snapshot builders in order to continue to make binaries which should be able to
run in as many locations as possible.
In the past, windows was installed from stage3 to guarantee convergence between
the host and target artifacts, but syntax extensions on all platforms are
currently relying on convergence, so special casing this one platform has become
less relevant over time.
This will also have the added benefit of dealing with #13474 and #13491. These
issues will be closed after next next nightly is confirmed to fix them.
This is intended to be the first thing somebody new to the language reads about Rust. It is supposed to be simple and intriguing, to give the user an idea of whether Rust is appropriate for them, and to hint that there's a lot of cool stuff to learn if they just keep diving deeper.
I'm particularly happy with the sequence of concurrency examples.
After removing absolute rpaths, cross compile builds (notably the nightly
builders) broke. This is because the RPATH was pointing at an empty directory
because only the rustc binary is copied over, not all of the target libraries.
This modifies the cross compile logic to fixup the rpath of the stage0
cross-compiled rustc to point to where it came from.
Concerns have been raised about using absolute rpaths in #11746, and this is the
first step towards not relying on rpaths at all. The only current use case for
an absolute rpath is when a non-installed rust builds an executable that then
moves from is built location. The relative rpath back to libstd and absolute
rpath to the installation directory still remain (CFG_PREFIX).
Closes#11746
Rebasing of #12754
First, documented the existing `CTEST_DISABLE_$(TEST_GROUP)` pattern
for conditionally disabling tests based on missing host features.
Added variant of above, `CTEST_DISABLE_NONSELFHOST_$(TEST_GROUP)`,
which is only queried in contexts where the target is not on the
CFG_HOST list (which I interpret as the list of targets that our host
can compatibly emulate; e.g. the example that i686 and x86_64 can in
theory run each others' tests).
Driveby fix: Remove redundant copy of
check-stage$(1)-T-$(2)-H-$(3)-$(4)-exec dependency declaration.
These are not installed anywhere, but are included under `./doc` for
those who want an offline copy with their nightlies. This increases the
size of the (compressed) tarball from 76 to 83 MB.
These syntax extensions need a place to be documented, and this starts passing a
`--cfg dox` parameter to `rustdoc` when building and testing documentation in
order to document macros so that they have no effect on the compiled crate, but
only documentation.
Closes#5605
These syntax extensions need a place to be documented, and this starts passing a
`--cfg dox` parameter to `rustdoc` when building and testing documentation in
order to document macros so that they have no effect on the compiled crate, but
only documentation.
Closes#5605
1. Fix a long-standing typo in the makefile: the relevant
CTEST_NAME here is `rpass-full` (with a dash), not
`rpass_full`.
2. The rpass-full tests depend on the complete set of target
libraries. Therefore, the rpass-full tests need to use
the dependencies held in the CSREQ-prefixed variable, not
the TLIBRUSTC_DEFAULT-prefixed variable.
Mac can't actually build our source tarballs because it's `tar`
command doesn't support the --exclude-vcs flag. This is just
a workaround to make our mac nightlies work (we get our source
tarballs from the linux bot).
This performs a few touch-ups to the OSX installer:
* A rust logo is shown during installation
* The installation happens to /usr/local by default (instead of /)
* A new welcome screen is shown that's slightly more relevant
This fixes some problems with
make verify-grammar
llnextgen still reports a lot of errors
FYI: My build directory /my-test/build is different from the source directory /my-test/rust.
cd /my-test/build
/my-test/rust/configure --prefix=/my-test/bin
make
make install
make verify-grammar
This performs a few touch-ups to the OSX installer:
* A rust logo is shown during installation
* The installation happens to /usr/local by default (instead of /)
* A new welcome screen is shown that's slightly more relevant
The previous dependency calculation was based on an arbitrary set of asterisks
at an arbitrary depth, but using the recursive version should be much more
robust in figuring out what's dependent.
When calling
make verify-grammar
rust.md cannot be found, because the
path to rust.md is missing.
The path is set to:
$(D)/rust.md
This can only be tested, when llnextgen is installed.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kobler <eng1@koblersystems.de>
The previous dependency calculation was based on an arbitrary set of asterisks
at an arbitrary depth, but using the recursive version should be much more
robust in figuring out what's dependent.
Closes#13118
