Update unstable docs for `asm!` macro
This adds documentation that SPIR-V is supported, expands on the restrictions for labels, and has some minor cleanups or clarifications.
r? `@joshtriplett`
Fix: don't document private macros by default
As part of #88019, I made it so private macros are documented in `--document-private-items` mode. Unfortunately, it appears that I also accidentally made them be documented when *not* in `--document-private-items` mode. This PR fixes that and adds a regression test.
r? `@jyn514` (I hope you don't mind that I keep sending PRs your way)
Fixes#88453.
`tcx.def_kind()` could theoretically invoke another query, which could
cause an infinite query loop. Accessing the HIR map directly makes that
less likely to happen.
I also changed it to use `as_local()` (`tcx.def_kind()` seems to
implicitly call `expect_local()`) and `opt_def_kind()` to reduce the
chance of panicking on valid code.
rustc_target: `TyAndLayout::field` should never error.
This refactor (making `TyAndLayout::field` return `TyAndLayout` without any `Result` around it) is based on a simple observation, regarding `TyAndLayout::field`:
If `cx.layout_of(ty)` succeeds (for some `cx` and `ty`), then `.field(cx, i)` on the resulting `TyAndLayout` should *always* succeed in computing `cx.layout_of(field_ty)` (where `field_ty` is the type of the `i`th field of `ty`).
The reason for this is that no matter which field is chosen, `cx.layout_of(field_ty)` *will have already been computed*, as part of computing `cx.layout_of(ty)`, as we cannot determine the layout of *any* type without considering the layouts of *all* of its fields.
And so it should be fine to turn any errors into ICEs, since they likely indicate a `cx` mismatch, or some other edge case that is due to a compiler bug (as opposed to ever being an user-facing error).
<hr/>
Each commit should probably be reviewed separately, though note that there's some `where` clauses (in `rustc_target::abi::call::*`) that change in most commits.
cc `@nagisa` `@oli-obk`
