Because bootstrap lib is already large and complicated, this should
make the "bumping change-id" process easier.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
This fixes the problem of not being able to see bootstrap config
changes unless the change-id in config.toml changes.
Signed-off-by: onur-ozkan <work@onurozkan.dev>
Add `Span` to `TraitBoundModifier`
This improves diagnostics for the message "`~const` is not allowed here", and also fixes the span that we use when desugaring `~const Tr` into `Tr<host>` in effects desugaring.
EvalCtxt::commit_if_ok don't inherit nested goals
we use it to check whether an alias is rigid, so we want to avoid considering an alias rigid simply because the inference constraints from normalizing it caused another nested goal fail
r? `@compiler-errors`
Add common trait for crate definitions
In stable mir, we specialize DefId, however some functionality is the same for every definition, such as def paths, and getting their crate. Use a trait to implement those.
Recompile LLVM when it changes in the git sources
Utilize a smart hash for 'llvm-finished-building' to enable recompilation of LLVM with each change in the git sources.
Each change generates a unique hash value in 'llvm-finished-building', which ensures LLVM compilations only triggered with further changes.
Resolves#111893
cc `@rust-lang/wg-llvm`
feat: make `let_binding_suggestion` more reasonable
This is my first PR for rustc, which trying to fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/117894, I am not familiar with some internal api so maybe some modification here isn't the way to go, appreciated for any review suggestion.
editor/code: add option to suppress error notifications
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/14193
- Added the `rust-analyzer.showRequestFailedErrorNotification` configuration option, which defaults to `true`
- If `rust-analyzer.showRequestFailedErrorNotification` is set to `true`, the current behavior is preserved.
- If `rust-analyzer.showRequestFailedErrorNotification` is set to `false`, no error toasts will be displayed for any of the failed requests caused by panics in r-a. This _only_ applies to events that are triggered "implicitly", such as `textDocument/hover`.
To test this, you can manually introduce a panic in one of the language server LSP handlers for non-command events. I added an explicit `panic!()` in the `textDocument/hover` event handler:
#### `rust-analyzer.showRequestFailedErrorNotification` set to `true` (default)
[2023-11-07 17-17-48.webm](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/assets/1665677/d0408ab8-79d1-42cf-a4e7-94e99d9783ec)
#### `rust-analyzer.showRequestFailedErrorNotification` set to `false`
[2023-11-07 17-16-49.webm](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/assets/1665677/0496d8d0-fb53-4bc6-a279-1a47f412dbdb)
Fix tidy tripping up on untracked files with special characters in their name
Previously, the tidy tool would fault if an untracked file had a space or other special characters in its name. If there was an untracked file "foo bar", it would include the quoting in it's path and split on the first space, giving output like this:
`skip untracked path "foo during rustfmt invocations`
Indicate that multiplication in Layout::array cannot overflow
Since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113113, we have added a check that skips calling into the allocator at all if `capacity == 0`. The global, default allocator will not actually try to allocate though; it returns a dangling pointer explicitly. However, these two checks are not merged/deduplicated by LLVM and so we're comparing to zero twice whenever vectors are allocated/grown. Probably cheap, but also potentially expensive in code size and seems like an unfortunate miss.
This removes that extra check by telling LLVM that the multiplication as part of Layout::array can't overflow, turning the original non-zero value into a zero value afterwards. In my checks locally this successfully drops the duplicate comparisons.
See https://rust.godbolt.org/z/b6nPP9dcK for a code example.
```rust
pub fn foo(elements: usize) -> Vec<u32> {
Vec::with_capacity(elements)
}
```
r? `@scottmcm` since you touched this in a32305a80f - curious if you have thoughts on doing this / can confirm my model of this being correct.
