This is a bad default, because the binaries will point at an absolute
path regardless of where they are moved. This opens up a security issue
for packages, because they will attempt to load libraries from a path
that's often owned by a regular user.
Every Rust binary is currently flagged by Debian, Fedora and Arch lint
checkers as having dangerous rpaths. They don't meet the requirements to
be placed in the repositories without manually stripping this from each
binary.
The relative rpath is still enough to keep the binaries working until
they are moved relative to the crates they're linked against.
http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssuehttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
This is a bad default, because the binaries will point at an absolute
path regardless of where they are moved. This opens up a security issue
for packages, because they will attempt to load libraries from a path
that's often owned by a regular user.
Every Rust binary is currently flagged by Debian, Fedora and Arch lint
checkers as having dangerous rpaths. They don't meet the requirements to
be placed in the repositories without manually stripping this from each
binary.
The relative rpath is still enough to keep the binaries working until
they are moved relative to the crates they're linked against.
http://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssuehttps://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Beware_of_Rpath
Remove all the explicit @mut-fields from CrateContext, though many
fields are still @-ptrs.
This required changing every single function call that explicitly
took a @CrateContext, so I took advantage and changed as many as I
could get away with to &-ptrs or &mut ptrs.
This un-reverts the reverts of the rusti commits made awhile back. These were reverted for an LLVM failure in rustpkg. I believe that this is not a problem with these commits, but rather that rustc is being used in parallel for rustpkg tests (in-process). This is not working yet (almost! see #7011), so I serialized all the tests to run one after another.
@brson, I'm mainly just guessing as to the cause of the LLVM failures in rustpkg tests. I'm confident that running tests in parallel is more likely to be the problem than those commits I made.
Additionally, this fixes two recently reported issues with rusti.
This almost removes the StringRef wrapper, since all strings are
Equiv-alent now. Removes a lot of `/* bad */ copy *`'s, and converts
several things to be &'static str (the lint table and the intrinsics
table).
There are many instances of .to_managed(), unfortunately.
Handle more characters that appear in types, most notably <>): were
missing. Also the new scheme takes care that no two different input
strings result in the same mangled string, which was not the case before.
Fixes#6921
Handle more characters that appear in types, most notably <>): were
missing. Also the new scheme takes care that no two different input
strings result in the same mangled string, which was not the case before.
Fixes#6921
Fix a laundry list of warnings involving unused imports that glutted
up compilation output. There are more, but there seems to be some
false positives (where 'remedy' appears to break the build), but this
particular set of fixes seems safe.
Fix a laundry list of warnings involving unused imports that glutted
up compilation output. There are more, but there seems to be some
false positives (where 'remedy' appears to break the build), but this
particular set of fixes seems safe.
This refactors pass handling to use the argument names, so it can be used
in a similar manner to `opt`. This may be slightly less efficient than the
previous version, but it is much easier to maintain.
It also adds in the ability to specify a custom pipeline on the command
line, this overrides the normal passes, however. This should completely
close#2396.
Refactor the optimization passes to explicitly use the passes. This commit
just re-implements the same passes as were already being run.
It also adds an option (behind `-Z`) to run the LLVM lint pass on the
unoptimized IR.
mentioned in #2625.
This change makes the module more oriented around
Process values instead of having to deal with process ids
directly.
Apart from issues mentioned in #2625, other changes include:
- Changing the naming to be more consistent - Process/process
is now used instead of a mixture of Program/program and
Process/process.
- More docs/tests.
Some io/scheduler related issues remain (mentioned in #2625).
