4244: Show unsafe trait in hover r=matklad a=DianaNites
Following on #2450 and #4210, for traits.
`unsafe` is the only qualifier they can have, though.
Co-authored-by: Diana <5275194+DianaNites@users.noreply.github.com>
4246: Validate uses of self and super r=matklad a=djrenren
This change follows on the validation of the `crate` keyword in paths. It verifies the following things:
`super`:
- May only be preceded by other `super` segments
- If in a `UseItem` then all semantically preceding paths also consist only of `super`
`self`
- May only be the start of a path
Just a note, a couple times while working on this I found myself really wanting a Visitor of some sort so that I could traverse descendants while skipping sub-trees that are unimportant. Iterators don't really work for this, so as you can see I reached for recursion. Considering paths are generally small a fancy debounced visitor probably isn't important but figured I'd say something in case we had something like this lying around and I wasn't using it.
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
4153: Add support for incremental text synchronization r=matklad a=lnicola
Fixes#3762.
This still needs a `ra_vfs` PR, but I want to know I'm on the right track. I tested the change and it didn't crash horribly, but YMMV.
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
4227: Report invalid, nested, multi-segment crate-paths r=matklad a=djrenren
There was a bug in the previous path-validating code that didn't detect multi-segment paths that started with `crate`.
```rust
// Successfully reported
use foo::{crate};
// BUG: was not being reported
use foo::{crate::bar};
```
This was due to my confusion about path-associativity. That is, the path with no qualifier is the innermost path, not the outermost. I've updated the code with a lot of comments to explain what's going on.
This bug was discovered when I found an erroneous `ok` test which I reported here:
https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4226
This test now fails and has been modified, hopefully in the spirit of the original test, to be correct. Sorry about submitting the bug in the first place!
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
4178: Validate the location of `crate` in paths r=matklad a=djrenren
**This solution does not fully handle `use` statements. See below**
This pull requests implements simple validation of usages of the `crate` keyword in `Path`s. Specifically it validates that:
- If a `PathSegment` is starts with the `crate` keyword, it is also the first segment of the `Path`
- All other usages of `crate` in `Path`s are considered errors.
This aligns with `rustc`'s rules. Unlike rustc this implementation does not issue a special error message in the case of `::crate` but it does catch the error.
Furthermore, this change does not cover all error cases. Specifically the following is not caught:
```rust
use foo::{crate}
```
This is because this check is context sensitive. From an AST perspective, `crate` is the root of the `Path`. Only by inspecting the full `UseItem` do we see that it is not in fact the root. This problem becomes worse because `UseTree`s are allowed to be arbitrarily nested:
```rust
use {crate, {{crate, foo::{crate}}}
```
So this is a hard problem to solve without essentially a breadth-first search. In a traditional compiler, I'd say this error is most easily found during the AST -> HIR conversion pass but within rust-analyzer I'm not sure where it belongs.
Under the implementation in this PR, such errors are ignored so we're *more correct* just not *entirely correct*.
Co-authored-by: John Renner <john@jrenner.net>
4119: Cache proc-macro dlls r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR try to fix a deadlock in proc-macro srv by not unloading dlls.
Currently we load and unload dlls for each request, however rustc TLS is leaky , such that if we do it a lot of times, all TLS index will be consumed and it will be deadlocked inside panic (it is because panic itself is using TLS too).
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
4204: Use specific pattern when translating if-let-else to match r=matklad a=matklad
We *probably* should actually use the same machinery here, as we do
for fill match arms, but just special-casing options and results seems
to be a good first step.
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
We *probably* should actually use the same machinery here, as we do
for fill match arms, but just special-casing options and results seems
to be a good first step.
4161: lsp-types 0.74 r=kjeremy a=kjeremy
* Fixes a bunch of param types to take partial progress into account.
* Will allow us to support insert/replace text in completions
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
