Don't suggest adding parentheses to call an inaccessible method.
Previously, code of this form would emit E0615 (attempt to use a method as a field), thus emphasizing the existence of private methods that the programmer probably does not care about. Now it ignores their existence instead, producing error E0609 (no field). The motivating example is:
```rust
let x = std::rc::Rc::new(());
x.inner;
```
which would previously mention the private method `Rc::inner()`, even though `Rc<T>` intentionally has no public methods so that it can be a transparent smart pointer for any `T`.
```rust
error[E0615]: attempted to take value of method `inner` on type `Rc<()>`
--> src/main.rs:3:3
|
3 | x.inner;
| ^^^^^ method, not a field
|
help: use parentheses to call the method
|
3 | x.inner();
| ++
```
With this change, it emits E0609 and no suggestion.
new solver: handle edge case of a recursion limit of 0
Apparently a recursion limit of 0 is possible/valid/useful/used/cute, the more you know 🌟 .
(It's somewhat interesting to me that the old solver seemingly handles this, and that the new solver currently requires a recursion limit of 2 here)
r? `@compiler-errors.`
Fixes#115351.
suggest removing `impl` in generic trait bound position
rustc already does this recovery in type param position (`<T: impl Trait>` -> `<T: Trait>`).
This PR also adds that suggestion in trait bound position (e.g. `where T: impl Trait` or `trait Trait { type Assoc: impl Trait; }`)
Make `get_return_block()` return `Some` only for HIR nodes in body
Fixes#114918
The issue occurred while compiling the following input:
```rust
fn uwu() -> [(); { () }] {
loop {}
}
```
It was caused by the code below trying to suggest a missing return type which resulted in a const eval cycle: 1bd043098e/compiler/rustc_hir_typeck/src/fn_ctxt/suggestions.rs (L68-L75)
The root cause was `get_return_block()` returning an `Fn` node for a node in the return type (i.e. the second `()` in the return type `[(); { () }]` of the input) although it is supposed to do so only for nodes that lie in the body of the function and return `None` otherwise (at least as per my understanding).
The PR fixes the issue by fixing this behaviour of `get_return_block()`.
parser: not insert dummy field in struct
Fixes#114636
This PR eliminates the dummy field, initially introduced in #113999, thereby enabling unrestricted use of `ident.unwrap()`. A side effect of this action is that we can only report the error of the first macro invocation field within the struct node.
An alternative solution might be giving a virtual name to the macro, but it appears more complex.(https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114636#issuecomment-1670228715). Furthermore, if you think https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/114636#issuecomment-1670228715 is a better solution, feel free to close this PR.
Previously, the test code would emit E0615, thus revealing the existence
of private methods that the programmer probably does not care about.
Now it ignores their existence instead, producing error E0609 (no field).
The motivating example is:
```rust
let x = std::rc::Rc::new(());
x.inner;
```
which would previously mention the private method `Rc::inner()`, even
though `Rc<T>` intentionally has no public methods so that it can be a
transparent smart pointer for any `T`.
Make RPITITs capture all in-scope lifetimes
Much like #114616, this implements the lang team decision from this T-lang meeting on [opaque captures strategy moving forward](https://hackmd.io/sFaSIMJOQcuwCdnUvCxtuQ?view). This will be RFC'd soon, but given that RPITITs are a nightly feature, this shouldn't necessarily be blocked on that.
We unconditionally capture all lifetimes in RPITITs -- impl is not as simple as #114616, since we still need to duplicate RPIT lifetimes to make sure we reify any late-bound lifetimes in scope.
Closes#112194
More precisely detect cycle errors from type_of on opaque
Not sure if this still needs work. Just putting it up for initial impressions, since it seems that a few people are frustrated with the increased error verbosity due to #113320.
Essentially we introduce a new sub-query for `type_of` specifically for opaques which returns a value that is able to distinguish "has errors" from "due to cycle recovery".
Fixes#115188
r? `@oli-obk`
Avoid duplicate `large_assignments` lints
By checking for overlapping spans.
This PR does the "reduce noisiness" task in #83518.
r? `@oli-obk` who added E-mentor and E-help-wanted and wrote the initial code.
(The fix itself is in dc82736677. The two commits before that are just small refactorings.)
On the following example, point at `String` instead of the whole type:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/own-bound-span.rs:14:24
|
LL | let _: <S as D>::P<String>;
| ^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
note: required by a bound in `D::P`
--> $DIR/own-bound-span.rs:4:15
|
LL | type P<T: Copy>;
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `D::P`
```
remove some unnecessary ignore-debug clauses
ignore-debug is only needed when the debug assertions *in the standard library* somehow affect the test. This can happen with inlining but otherwise should be rare. ignore-debug is problematic since PR CI is only run with debug assertions.
r? `@cjgillot` since it looks like you added most of these
Allow explicit `#[repr(Rust)]`
This is identical to no `repr()` at all. For `Rust, packed` and `Rust, align(x)`, it should be the same as no `Rust` at all (as, afaik, `#[repr(align(16))]` uses the Rust ABI.)
The main use case for this is being able to explicitly say "I want to use the Rust ABI" in very very rare circumstances where the first obvious choice would be the C ABI yet is undesirable, which is already possible with functions as `extern "Rust"`. This would be useful for silencing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/11253. It's also more consistent with `extern`.
The lack of this also tripped me up a bit when I was new to Rust, as I expected this to be possible.
Fix ub-int-array test for big-endian platforms
As of commit 7767cbb3b0b332fd0a46e347ea7f68f20109d768, the tests/ui/consts/const-eval/ub-int-array.rs test is failing on big-endian platforms (in particular s390x), as the stderr output contains a hex dump that depends on endianness.
Since this point intentionally verifies the hex dump to check the uninitialized byte markers, I think we should not simply standardize away the hex dump as is done with some of the other tests in this directory.
However, most of the test is already endian-independent. The only exception is one line of hex dump, which can also be made endian-independent by choosing appropriate constants in the source code.
Since the 32bit and 64bit stderr outputs were already (and remain) identical, I've merged them and removed the stderr-per-bitwidth marker.
Fixes (again) https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/105383.
