This patch transforms functions of the form
```
fn f<Generic: AsRef<Concrete>>(arg: Generic) {
let arg: &Concrete = arg.as_ref();
// Code using arg
}
```
to the next form:
```
#[inline]
fn f<Generic: AsRef<Concrete>>(arg: Generic) {
fn f_inner(arg: &Concrete) {
// Code using arg
}
f_inner(arg.as_ref());
}
```
Therefore, most of the code is concrete and not duplicated during monomorphisation (unless inlined)
and only the tiny bit of conversion code is duplicated. This method was mentioned by @aturon in the
Conversion Traits RFC (https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/blame/master/text/0529-conversion-traits.md#L249) and similar techniques are not uncommon in C++ template libraries.
This patch goes to the extremes and applies the transformation even to smaller functions<sup>1</sup>
for purity of the experiment. *Some of them can be rolled back* if considered too ridiculous.
<sup>1</sup> However who knows how small are these functions are after inlining and everything.
The functions in question are mostly `fs`/`os` functions and not used especially often with variety
of argument types, so the code size reduction is rather small (but consistent). Here are the sizes
of stage2 artifacts before and after the patch:
https://gist.github.com/petrochenkov/e76a6b280f382da13c5dhttps://gist.github.com/petrochenkov/6cc28727d5256dbdfed0
Note:
All the `inner` functions are concrete and unavailable for cross-crate inlining, some of them may
need `#[inline]` annotations in the future.
r? @aturon
Overflows in integer pow() computations would be missed if they
preceded a 0 bit of the exponent being processed. This made
calls such as 2i32.pow(1024) not trigger an overflow.
Fixes#28012
This allows to skip the codegen for all the unneeded landing pads, reducing code size across the board by about 2-5%, depending on the crate. Compile times seem to be pretty unaffected though :-/
Unwinding across an FFI boundary is undefined behaviour, so we can mark
all external function as nounwind. The obvious exception are those
functions that actually perform the unwinding.
In addition to instruction updates I
- changed from wget to curl, because curl is a prerequisite of rust itself
- removed `[...]` because they're missing from so many places it would just obscure the instructions if they were all put in
r? @steveklabnik
The sort key is a (DefId, Name), which is *not* stable between
runs, so we must re-sort when loading.
Fixes#24063Fixes#25467Fixes#27222Fixes#28377
r? @eddyb
This changes libfmt_macros `CharIndices` iterator into `Peekable` so it can be used without `.clone()`.
Also changed some `loop match` and `match` to `while let` and `if let` respectively (mostly for readability).
new error style:
```
path.rs:4:6: 4:7 error: the trait `core::marker::Sized` is not implemented for the type `[u8]` [E0277]
path.rs:4 fn f(p: Path) {}
^
path.rs:4:6: 4:7 help: run `rustc --explain E0277` to see a detailed explanation
path.rs:4:6: 4:7 note: `[u8]` does not have a constant size known at compile-time
path.rs:4:6: 4:7 note: required because it appears within the type `std::sys::os_str::Slice`
path.rs:4:6: 4:7 note: required because it appears within the type `std::ffi::os_str::OsStr`
path.rs:4:6: 4:7 note: required because it appears within the type `std::path::Path`
path.rs:4:6: 4:7 note: all local variables must have a statically known size
path.rs:7:5: 7:36 error: the trait `core::marker::Send` is not implemented for the type `alloc::rc::Rc<()>` [E0277]
path.rs:7 foo::<BTreeMap<Rc<()>, Rc<()>>>();
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
path.rs:7:5: 7:36 help: run `rustc --explain E0277` to see a detailed explanation
path.rs:7:5: 7:36 note: `alloc::rc::Rc<()>` cannot be sent between threads safely
path.rs:7:5: 7:36 note: required because it appears within the type `collections::btree::node::Node<alloc::rc::Rc<()>, alloc::rc::Rc<()>>`
path.rs:7:5: 7:36 note: required because it appears within the type `collections::btree::map::BTreeMap<alloc::rc::Rc<()>, alloc::rc::Rc<()>>`
path.rs:7:5: 7:36 note: required by `foo`
error: aborting due to 2 previous errors
```
This improves the #21793/#23286 situation
There is a dead code in libsyntax/parser/parse.rs, when parsing structs.
Two functions are involved:
* [parse_item_struct](cd9c9f048f/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs (L4691))
* [parse_tuple_struct_body](cd9c9f048f/src/libsyntax/parse/parser.rs (L4769))
The problem is that both functions handle the case with unit structs. But because
`parse_tuple_struct_body` is called from `parse_item_struct`, it never faces
this case.
This PR removes unit struct case from `parse_tuple_struct_body` function. I tested with `make -j8 check-statge1`.
Commit 9104a902c0 fixed the generated
files, but that change would be lost (or require additional manual
intervention) if they are re-generated of if new architectures are
added.
cc #28273
This is something that I wish I had when I started contributing to Rust (not that long ago :). I plan on writing a manual for bors and the rust testing setup too, if there isn't one already.
- Headlines begin at 1st level now like the rest of the book
- All Headlines a blank line above and below
- Fix links in this chapter's TOC
r? @steveklabnik
