The let-syntax expander is different in that it doesn't apply
a mark to its token trees before expansion. This is used
for macro_rules, and it's because macro_rules is essentially
MTWT's let-syntax. You don't want to mark before expand sees
let-syntax, because there's no "after" syntax to mark again.
In some sense, the cleaner approach might be to introduce a new
AST node that macro_rules expands into; this would make it clearer
that the expansion of a macro is distinct from the addition of a
new macro binding.
This should work for now, though...
This updates https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/15075.
Rename `ToStr::to_str` to `ToString::to_string`. The naive renaming ends up with two `to_string` functions defined on strings in the prelude (the other defined via `collections::str::StrAllocating`). To remedy this I removed `StrAllocating::to_string`, making all conversions from `&str` to `String` go through `Show`. This has a measurable impact on the speed of this conversion, but the sense I get from others is that it's best to go ahead and unify `to_string` and address performance for all `to_string` conversions in `core::fmt`. `String::from_str(...)` still works as a manual fast-path.
Note that the patch was done with a script, and ended up renaming a number of other `*_to_str` functions, particularly inside of rustc. All the ones I saw looked correct, and I didn't notice any additional API breakage.
Closes#15046.
closes#13367
[breaking-change] Use `Sized?` to indicate a dynamically sized type parameter or trait (used to be `type`). E.g.,
```
trait Tr for Sized? {}
fn foo<Sized? X: Share>(x: X) {}
```
closes#13367
[breaking-change] Use `Sized?` to indicate a dynamically sized type parameter or trait (used to be `type`). E.g.,
```
trait Tr for Sized? {}
fn foo<Sized? X: Share>(x: X) {}
```
This will break code that looks like:
struct Foo {
...
}
mod Foo {
...
}
Change this code to:
struct Foo {
...
}
impl Foo {
...
}
Or rename the module.
Closes#15205.
[breaking-change]
r? @nick29581
Extend the null ptr optimization to work with slices, closures, procs, & trait objects by using the internal pointers as the discriminant.
This decreases the size of `Option<&[int]>` (and similar) by one word.
This will break code that used the old `Index` trait. Change this code
to use the new `Index` traits. For reference, here are their signatures:
pub trait Index<Index,Result> {
fn index<'a>(&'a self, index: &Index) -> &'a Result;
}
pub trait IndexMut<Index,Result> {
fn index_mut<'a>(&'a mut self, index: &Index) -> &'a mut Result;
}
Closes#6515.
[breaking-change]
r? @nick29581
This will break code that used the old `Index` trait. Change this code
to use the new `Index` traits. For reference, here are their signatures:
pub trait Index<Index,Result> {
fn index<'a>(&'a self, index: &Index) -> &'a Result;
}
pub trait IndexMut<Index,Result> {
fn index_mut<'a>(&'a mut self, index: &Index) -> &'a mut Result;
}
Closes#6515.
[breaking-change]
This will break code that looks like:
struct Foo {
...
}
mod Foo {
...
}
Change this code to:
struct Foo {
...
}
impl Foo {
...
}
Or rename the module.
Closes#15205.
[breaking-change]
I ran `make check` and everything went smoothly. I also tested `#[deriving(Decodable, Encodable)]` on a struct containing both Cell<T> and RefCell<T> and everything now seems to work fine.
LLVM doesn't handle i1 value in allocas/memory very well and skips a number of optimizations if it hits it. So we have to do the same thing that Clang does, using i1 for SSA values, but storing i8 in memory.
Fixes#15203.
LLVM doesn't really like types with a bit-width that isn't a multiple of
8 and disable various optimizations if it encounters such types used
with loads/stores. OTOH, booleans must be represented as i1 when used as
SSA values. To get the best results, we must use i1 for SSA values, and
i8 when storing the value to memory.
By using range asserts on loads, LLVM can eliminate the required
zero-extend and truncate operations.
Fixes#15203
`Vec::push_all` with a length 1 slice seems to have significant overhead compared to `Vec::push`.
```
test new_push_byte ... bench: 6985 ns/iter (+/- 487) = 17 MB/s
test old_push_byte ... bench: 19335 ns/iter (+/- 1368) = 6 MB/s
```
```rust
extern crate test;
use test::Bencher;
static TEXT: &'static str = "\
Unicode est un standard informatique qui permet des échanges \
de textes dans différentes langues, à un niveau mondial.";
#[bench]
fn old_push_byte(bencher: &mut Bencher) {
bencher.bytes = TEXT.len() as u64;
bencher.iter(|| {
let mut new = String::new();
for b in TEXT.bytes() {
unsafe { new.as_mut_vec().push_all([b]) }
}
})
}
#[bench]
fn new_push_byte(bencher: &mut Bencher) {
bencher.bytes = TEXT.len() as u64;
bencher.iter(|| {
let mut new = String::new();
for b in TEXT.bytes() {
unsafe { new.as_mut_vec().push(b) }
}
})
}
```
