If the type of the result of a call to `IntoIterator::into_iter()`
and the type of the receiver are the same, then the receiver
implements `Iterator` and `into_iter()` is the identity function.
The call to `into_iter()` may be removed in all but two cases:
- If the receiver implements `Copy`, `into_iter()` will produce
a copy of the receiver and cannot be removed. For example,
`x.into_iter().next()` will not advance `x` while `x.next()` will.
- If the receiver is an immutable local variable and the call to
`into_iter()` appears in a larger expression, removing the call to
`into_iter()` might cause mutability issues. For example, if `x`
is an immutable local variable, `x.into_iter().next()` will
compile while `x.next()` will not as `next()` receives
`&mut self`.
Don't lint `implicit_clone` when the type doesn't implement clone
fixes#10019
changelog: `implicit_clone`: Don't lint when the type doesn't implement clone
Fix#9958
This PR fixes#9958. In order to fix the issue, the lint will now peel reference operators and enclose the expression with parentheses when necessary.
changelog: [`comparison_to_empty`]: Peel deref operators in suggestions when necessary
Don't lint `from_over_into` for opaque types
fixes#9935
This is stalled until the next sync. The impl in question can't be written on the pinned nightly.
changelog: Don't lint `from_over_into` for opaque types
Treat custom enum discriminant values as constants
fixes#9882
changelog: All lints: Don't lint in enum discriminant values when the suggestion won't work in a const context
Don't lint `explicit_auto_deref` when the initial type is neither a reference, nor a receiver
fixes#9901fixes#9777
changelog: `explicit_auto_deref`: Don't lint when the initial value is neither a reference, nor a receiver
Don't cross contexts while building the suggestion for `redundant_closure_call`
fixes#9957
changelog: `redundant_closure_call`: Don't cross macro contexts while building the suggestion
Move `unnecessary_unsafety_doc` to `pedantic`
This lint was added in #9822. I like the idea, but also agree with #9986 as well. I think it should at least not be warn-by-default. This is one of these cases, where I'd like a group between pedantic and restriction. But I believe that users using `#![warn(clippy::pedantic)]` will know how to enable the lint if they disagree with it.
---
Since the lint is new:
changelog: none
r? `@flip1995` since I'd suggest back porting this, the original PR was merged 16 days ago.
Closes: #9986 (While it doesn't address everything, I believe that this is the best compromise)
Add allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args config
Implement `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to change the behavior of the `uninlined_format_args` lint. Now it is a part of `style` per [Zulip chat](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257328-clippy/topic/.60uninlined_format_args.60.20category), and won't propose inlining in case of a mixed usage, e.g. `print!("{} {}", var, 1+2)`. If the user sets `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to `false`, the lint would behave like it did before -- proposing to inline args even in the mixed case.
---
changelog: [`uninlined_format_args`]: Added a new config `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` to allow the lint, if only some arguments can be inlined
[#9865](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9865)
changelog: Moved [`uninlined_format_args`] to `style` (Now warn-by-default)
[#9865](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/9865)
Implement `allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args` config param to change the behavior of the `uninlined_format_args` lint. Now it is a part of `style`, and won't propose inlining in case of a mixed usage, e.g. `print!("{} {}", var, 1+2)`. If the user sets allow-mixed-uninlined-format-args config param to `false`, then it would behave like before, proposing to inline args even in the mixed case.
Previously, async constructs would be lowered to "normal" generators,
with an additional `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim in between to
convert from `Generator` to `Future`.
The compiler will now special-case these generators internally so that
async constructs will *directly* implement `Future` without the need
to go through the `from_generator` / `GenFuture` shim.
The primary motivation for this change was hiding this implementation
detail in stack traces and debuginfo, but it can in theory also help
the optimizer as there is less abstractions to see through.
Add `clippy_utils::msrv::Msrv` to keep track of the current MSRV
changelog: Fix the scoping of the `#![clippy::msrv]` attribute
Fixes#6920
r? `@Jarcho`
Fix [`unnecessary_lazy_eval`] when type has significant drop
fix for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/9427#issuecomment-1295742590
However current implementation gives too many false positive, rending the lint almost useless.
I don't know what's the best way to check if a type has a "significant" drop (in the common meaning, not the internal rustc one, for example Option<(u8, u8)> should not be considered significant)
changelog: Fix [`unnecessary_lazy_eval`] when type has significant drop
Fix#9771 (`unnecessary_to_owned` false positive)
Fixes#9771
In that issue's example(s), the lint tried to add a `&` to a value, which implicitly changed the type of a field to a reference. The fix is to add the reference to `receiver_ty` (the type of the receiver of the `to_owned`-like method), before passing `receiver_ty` to `can_change_type`. `can_change_type` properly rejects the modified `receiver_ty`.
cc: `@mikerite` just because I think he was the author of `can_change_type`.
changelog: fix `unnecessary_to_owned` false positive which implicitly tried to change the type of a field to a reference
