Move caching of inlined HIR into CrateStore
So far we've had separate HIR-inlining caches for each codegen unit and the caching for things inlined during constant evaluation had some holes. Consequently, things would be inlined multiple times if they were used from different codegen units, etc, leading to
- wasted memory,
- multiple `NodeId`s per `DefId` and,
- for things inlined during constant evaluation, no way to map a `NodeId` back to it's original `DefId`.
This PR moves all caching into the CrateStore, solving all of the above problems. It also fixes some bugs in the inlining code, like cyclic in the parent-chains in the HIR map and some `NodeId`'s being translated to more or less random values. There are assertions in place now that should prevent this kind of thing in the future.
This PR based on top of #35090, which contains some necessary fixes.
Use "x86-64" as the target CPU for NetBSD and Bitrig on amd64.
Using "generic" disables a number of features that are present on all
x86_64 cpus, the "x86-64" target cpu is the common denominator for that
arch.
Refs #20777
Methods `Fn(Mut,Once)::call(mut,once)` are gated with two feature gates, remove one of them
Methods `Fn::call`, `FnMut::call_mut` and `FnOnce::call_once` are gated with usual library feature `fn_traits` and also hardcoded in the compiler and gated once more with feature `unboxed_closures`
This patch removes the `unboxed_closures`feature gate from these methods (`unboxed_closures` is still used for other things though), now they are gated only with `fn_traits`.
All unnecessary `#![feature(unboxed_closures)]`s are removed, many of them are old and were already unnecessary before the change this PR does.
LLVM upgrade
As discussed in https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/need-help-with-emscripten-port/3154/46 I'm trying to update the used LLVM checkout in Rust.
I basically took @shepmaster's code and applied it on top (though I did the commits manually, the [original commits have better descriptions](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/compare/master...avr-rust:avr-support).
With these changes I was able to build rustc. `make check` throws one last error on `run-pass/issue-28950.rs`. Output: https://gist.github.com/badboy/bcdd3bbde260860b6159aa49070a9052
I took the metadata changes as is and they seem to work, though it now uses the module in another step. I'm not sure if this is the best and correct way.
Things to do:
* [x] ~~Make `run-pass/issue-28950.rs` pass~~ unrelated
* [x] Find out how the `PositionIndependentExecutable` setting is now used
* [x] Is the `llvm::legacy` still the right way to do these things?
cc @brson @alexcrichton
trans: Avoid weak linkage for closures when linking with MinGW.
This PR proposes one possible solution to #34793, the problem that prevents https://github.com/servo/servo/pull/12393 from landing. It applies the same strategy, that we already use for monomorphizations, to closures, that is, instead of emitting symbols with `weak_odr` linkage in order to avoid symbol conflicts, we emit them with `internal` linkage, with the side effect that we have to copy code instead of just linking to it, if more than one codegen unit is involved.
With this PR, the compiler will only apply this strategy for targets where we would actually run into a problem when using `weak_odr` linkage, in other words nothing will change for platforms except for MinGW.
The solution implemented here has one restriction that could be lifted with some more effort, but it does not seem to be worth the trouble since it will go away once we use only MIR-trans: If someone compiles code
1. on MinGW,
2. with more than one codegen unit,
3. *not* using MIR-trans,
4. and runs into a closure inlined from another crate
then the compiler will abort and suggest to compile either with just one codegen unit or `-Zorbit`.
What's nice about this is that I lays a foundation for also doing the same for generics: using weak linkage where possible and thus enabling some more space optimizations that the linker can do.
~~This PR also contains a test case for compiling a program that contains more than 2^15 closures. It's a huge, generated file with almost 100K LOCs. I did not commit the script for generating the file but could do so. Alternatively, maybe someone wants to come up with a way of doing this with macros.~~
The test file is implemented via macros now (thanks @alexcrichton!)
Opinions?
Fixes#34793.
cc @rust-lang/compiler
This adds a question and answer to the Q&A section of the Copy
docs. Specifically, it asks the question I asked while reading
the docs, and gives its answer.
typeck: use a TypeVisitor in ctp
Use a TypeVisitor in ctp instead of `ty::walk`
This fixes a few cases where a region could be projected out of a trait while not being constrained by the type parameters, violating rust-lang/rfcs#447 and breaking soundness. As such, this is a [breaking-change].
Fixes#35139
r? @eddyb
Avoid writing a temporary closure kind
We used to write a temporary closure kind into the inference table, but
this could lead to obligations being incorrectled resolved before
inference had completed. This result could then be cached, leading to
further trouble. This patch avoids writing any closure kind until the
computation is complete.
Fixes#34349.
r? @arielb1 -- what do you think?
diagnostically note source of overruling outer forbid
When we emit E0453 (lint level attribute overruled by outer `forbid`
lint level), it could be helpful to note where the `forbid` level was
set, for the convenience of users who, e.g., believe that the correct
fix is to weaken the `forbid` to `deny`.
Suggest use of `--print target-list` when target is not found.
If given target could not be found suggest using `--print target-list`.
Previously, error has been reported as:
$ rustc --target 86-unknown-linux-gnu
error: Error loading target specification: Could not find specification for target "86-unknown-linux-gnu"
After changes it looks as follows:
$ rustc --target 86-unknown-linux-gnu
error: Error loading target specification: Could not find specification for target "x86-unknown-linux-gnu". Use `--print target-list` for a list of supported targets
Beginners may try to adapt the tutorial to develop their own code.
When using different dependencies, they may use the wildcard for
versioning. Since they are new to the language, they will not know
that the wildcard asterisk is a string, not a token. Make the correct
format more explicit, to remove one potential source of frustration.
If given target could not be found suggest using `--print target-list`.
Previously, error has been reported as:
$ rustc --target x86-unknown-linux-gnu
error: Error loading target specification: Could not find specification for target "x86-unknown-linux-gnu"
After changes it looks as follows:
rustc --target x86-unknown-linux-gnu
error: Error loading target specification: Could not find specification for target "x86-unknown-linux-gnu"
help: Use `--print target-list` for a list of built-in targets
Add ARM MUSL targets
Rebase of #33189.
I tested this by producing a std for `arm-unknown-linux-musleabi` then I cross compiled Hello world to said target. Checked that the produced binary was statically linked and verified that the binary worked under QEMU.
This depends on rust-lang/libc#341. I'll have to update this PR after that libc PR is merged.
I'm also working on generating ARM musl cross toolchain via crosstool-ng. Once I verified those work, I'll send a PR to rust-buildbot.
r? @alexcrichton
cc @timonvo
Fix build of compiler-rt on FreeBSD
Broken since ee6011fc71 removed cmake from the
process. There are likely other platforms still broken, but I didn't test on them.
Properly feature gate all unstable ABIs
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34900
[breaking-change]
r? @pnkfelix
---
Function-visiting machinery for AST/HIR is surprisingly error-prone, it's *very* easy to miss some cases or visit something twice while writing a visitor. This is the true problem behind https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/34900. I'll try to restructure these visitors a bit and send one more PR later.
When we emit E0453 (lint level attribute overruled by outer `forbid`
lint level), it could be helpful to note where the `forbid` level was
set, for the convenience of users who, e.g., believe that the correct
fix is to weaken the `forbid` to `deny`.
The targets are:
- `arm-unknown-linux-musleabi`
- `arm-unknown-linux-musleabihf`
- `armv7-unknown-linux-musleabihf`
These mirror the existing `gnueabi` targets.
All of these targets produce fully static binaries, similar to the
x86 MUSL targets.
For now these targets can only be used with `--rustbuild` builds, as
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-rt/pull/22 only made the
necessary compiler-rt changes in the CMake configs, not the plain
GNU Make configs.
I've tested these targets GCC 5.3.0 compiled again musl-1.1.12
(downloaded from http://musl.codu.org/). An example `./configure`
invocation is:
```
./configure \
--enable-rustbuild
--target=arm-unknown-linux-musleabi \
--musl-root="$MUSL_ROOT"
```
where `MUSL_ROOT` points to the `arm-linux-musleabi` prefix.
Usually that path will be of the form
`/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/arm-linux-musleabi`.
Usually the cross-compile toolchain will live under
`/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/bin`. That path should either by added
to your `PATH` variable, or you should add a section to your
`config.toml` as follows:
```
[target.arm-unknown-linux-musleabi]
cc = "/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/bin/arm-linux-musleabi-gcc"
cxx = "/foobar/arm-linux-musleabi/bin/arm-linux-musleabi-g++"
```
As a prerequisite you'll also have to put a cross-compiled static
`libunwind.a` library in `$MUSL_ROOT/lib`. This is similar to [how
the x86_64 MUSL targets are built]
(https://doc.rust-lang.org/book/advanced-linking.html).
This is to pull in changes to support ARM MUSL targets.
This change also commits a couple of other cargo-generated changes
to other dependencies in the various Cargo.toml files.
