16 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Patrick Walton
a5bb0a3a45 librustc: Remove the fallback to int for integers and f64 for
floating point numbers for real.

This will break code that looks like:

    let mut x = 0;
    while ... {
        x += 1;
    }
    println!("{}", x);

Change that code to:

    let mut x = 0i;
    while ... {
        x += 1;
    }
    println!("{}", x);

Closes #15201.

[breaking-change]
2014-06-29 11:47:58 -07:00
Niko Matsakis
9e3d0b002a librustc: Remove the fallback to int from typechecking.
This breaks a fair amount of code. The typical patterns are:

* `for _ in range(0, 10)`: change to `for _ in range(0u, 10)`;

* `println!("{}", 3)`: change to `println!("{}", 3i)`;

* `[1, 2, 3].len()`: change to `[1i, 2, 3].len()`.

RFC #30. Closes #6023.

[breaking-change]
2014-06-24 17:18:48 -07:00
Alex Crichton
daf5f5a4d1 Drop the '2' suffix from logging macros
Who doesn't like a massive renaming?
2013-10-22 08:09:56 -07:00
Alex Crichton
630082ca89 rpass: Remove usage of fmt! 2013-09-30 23:21:19 -07:00
Corey Richardson
cc57ca012a Use assert_eq! rather than assert! where possible 2013-05-19 08:16:02 -04:00
Patrick Walton
1e91595520 librustc: Remove fail_unless! 2013-03-29 16:39:08 -07:00
Patrick Walton
d7e74b5e91 librustc: Convert all uses of assert over to fail_unless! 2013-03-07 22:37:57 -08:00
Nick Desaulniers
4445b38df2 Remove die!, raplace invocations with fail! Issue #4524 pt 3 2013-02-13 17:01:32 -08:00
Graydon Hoare
89c8ef792f check-fast fallout from removing export, r=burningtree 2013-02-01 19:43:17 -08:00
Nick Desaulniers
aee7929469 Replace most invocations of fail keyword with die! macro 2013-01-31 20:12:49 -08:00
Graydon Hoare
d1affff623 Reliciense makefiles and testsuite. Yup. 2012-12-10 17:32:58 -08:00
Brian Anderson
518dc52f85 Reformat
This changes the indexing syntax from .() to [], the vector syntax from ~[] to
[] and the extension syntax from #fmt() to #fmt[]
2011-08-20 11:04:00 -07:00
Brian Anderson
c53402846e Remove all xfail-stage0 directives
While it is still technically possible to test stage 0, it is not part of any
of the main testing rules and maintaining xfail-stage0 is a chore. Nobody
should worry about how tests fare in stage0.
2011-08-03 10:55:59 -07:00
Marijn Haverbeke
df7f21db09 Reformat for new syntax 2011-07-27 15:54:33 +02:00
Graydon Hoare
ce72993488 Reformat source tree (minus a couple tests that are still grumpy). 2011-06-15 11:19:50 -07:00
Brian Anderson
b62bf8cede rustc: Allow if expressions to fail 2011-05-21 14:22:01 -04:00