Make warnings of renamed and removed lints themselves lints
This adds the `renamed_and_removed_lints` warning, defaulting
to the warning level.
Fixes#31141
End-less ranges (`a...`) don't parse but bad syntax extensions could
conceivably produce them. Unbounded ranges (`...`) do parse and are
caught here.
The other panics in HIR lowering are all for unexpanded macros, which
cannot be constructed by bad syntax extensions.
while I'm at it, remove the "extra caching" that I was doing for no good
reason except laziness. Basically before I was caching at each scope in
the chain, but there's not really a reason to do that, since the cached
entry point at level N is always equal to the last cached exit point
from level N-1.
Index 0 must be a valid char boundary (invariant of str that it contains
valid UTF-8 data).
If we check explicitly for index == 0, that removes the need to read the
byte at index 0, so it avoids a trip to the string's memory, and it
optimizes out the slicing index' bounds check whenever it is zero.
With this change, the following examples all change from having a read of
the byte at 0 and a branch to possibly panicing, to having the bounds
checking optimized away.
```rust
pub fn split(s: &str) -> (&str, &str) {
s.split_at(0)
}
pub fn both(s: &str) -> &str {
&s[0..s.len()]
}
pub fn first(s: &str) -> &str {
&s[..0]
}
pub fn last(s: &str) -> &str {
&s[0..]
}
```
It's nice to be able to index with a scope-id,
but coherence rules prevent us from implementing
`Index<ScopeId>` for `Vec<ScopeAuxiliary>`, and I'd
prefer that `ScopeAuxiliary` remain in librustc_mir,
just for compilation time reasons.
This was triggered by me wanting to address a use of DUMMY_SP, but
actually I'm not sure what would be a better span -- I guess the span
for the function as a whole.
Docs: Change "statements" to "expressions" on `match`
I apt to use `expressions` over `statements`, because `match` is a expression in essence, though it can become a statement when followed a semicolon.
Annotate run-pass/backtrace with #[rustc_no_mir] on MSVC.
Fixes#32384 by not using MIR on MSVC for the functions in the path of the backtrace.
This is the known blocker for the MSVC MIR builder, hopefully the only one overall.
r? @alexcrichton Confirmed to work on a nightly, by @retep998.
rustdoc: Consider `doc(no_inline)` in crate-local inlining
Imports with `doc(no_inline)` will not be inlined, even when `doc(inline)` is present.
fixes#32343
r? @alexcrichton
