The ICE message is somewhat confusing and overly specific - the issue is
that there's no MIR available.
This should make debugging these ICEs easier since the error tells you
what's actually wrong, not what it was trying to do when it failed.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/80952#issuecomment-759198841
For example, this code:
struct S(i32, f32);
let S(x) = S(0, 1.0);
will make the compiler suggest either:
let S(x, _) = S(0, 1.0);
or:
let S(x, ..) = S(0, 1.0);
Fix rustdoc --test-builder argument parsing
My suggested fix to issue #80893. I can actually hook Miri in there now.
I also fixed what I believe to be a typo in the option's help text.
Fix --pretty=expanded with --remap-path-prefix
Per https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/80832, using
--pretty=expanded and --remap-path-prefix results in an ICE.
This is becasue the session source files table is stored in remapped
form, whereas --pretty-expanded looks up unremapped files. This remaps
the path prefixes before lookup.
~~There don't appear to be any existing tests for --pretty=expanded; I'll look into
adding some.~~ Never mind, found the pretty tests.
Fixes#80832
Update to LLVM 11.0.1
This updates to a new LLVM branch, rebased on the upstream `llvmorg-11.0.1`. All our patches applied cleanly except the fortanix unwind changes, which just needed a small adjustment in cmake files.
r? `@nikic`
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/73722
use Once instead of Mutex to manage capture resolution
For #78299
This allows us to return borrows of the captured backtrace frames that are tied to a borrow of the Backtrace itself, instead of to some short-lived Mutex guard.
We could alternatively share `&Mutex<Capture>`s and lock on-demand, but then we could potentially forget to call `resolve()` before working with the capture. It also makes it semantically clearer what synchronization is needed on the capture.
cc `@seanchen1991` `@rust-lang/project-error-handling`
Added support for i386-unknown-linux-gnu and i486-unknown-linux-gnu
Support for both can be useful when creating new firmware, boot loaders,
or embedded operating systems.
Separate out a `hir::Impl` struct
This makes it possible to pass the `Impl` directly to functions, instead
of having to pass each of the many fields one at a time. It also
simplifies matches in many cases.
See `rustc_save_analysis::dump_visitor::process_impl` or `rustdoc::clean::clean_impl` for a good example of how this makes `impl`s easier to work with.
r? `@petrochenkov` maybe?
This makes it possible to pass the `Impl` directly to functions, instead
of having to pass each of the many fields one at a time. It also
simplifies matches in many cases.
The optimized MIR for closures is being encoded unconditionally, while
being unnecessary for cargo check. This turns out to be especially
costly with MIR inlining enabled, since it triggers computation of
optimized MIR for all callees that are being examined for inlining
purposes.
Skip encoding of optimized MIR for closures, enum constructors, struct
constructors, and trait fns when not doing codegen, like it is already
done for other items since 49433.
Turn type inhabitedness into a query to fix `exhaustive_patterns` perf
We measured in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79394 that enabling the [`exhaustive_patterns` feature](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51085) causes significant perf degradation. It was conjectured that the culprit is type inhabitedness checking, and [I hypothesized](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/79394#issuecomment-733861149) that turning this computation into a query would solve most of the problem.
This PR turns `tcx.is_ty_uninhabited_from` into a query, and I measured a 25% perf gain on the benchmark that stress-tests `exhaustiveness_patterns`. This more than compensates for the 30% perf hit I measured [when creating it](https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc-perf/pull/801). We'll have to measure enabling the feature again, but I suspect this fixes the perf regression entirely.
I'd like a perf run on this PR obviously.
I made small atomic commits to help reviewing. The first one is just me discovering the "revisions" feature of the testing framework.
I believe there's a push to move things out of `rustc_middle` because it's huge. I guess `inhabitedness/mod.rs` could be moved out, but it's quite small. `DefIdForest` might be movable somewhere too. I don't know what the policy is for that.
Ping `@camelid` since you were interested in following along
`@rustbot` modify labels: +A-exhaustiveness-checking
Since `DefIdForest` contains 0 or 1 elements the large majority of the
time, by allocating only in the >1 case we avoid almost all allocations,
compared to `Arc<SmallVec<[DefId;1]>>`. This shaves off 0.2% on the
benchmark that stresses uninhabitedness checking.
Remove much of the special-case handling around crate metadata
dependency tracking by replacing `DepKind::CrateMetadata` and the
pre-allocation of corresponding `DepNodes` with on-demand invocation
of the `crate_hash` query.
Make CTFE able to check for UB...
... by not doing any optimizations on the `const fn` MIR used in CTFE. This means we duplicate all `const fn`'s MIR now, once for CTFE, once for runtime. This PR is for checking the perf effect, so we have some data when talking about https://github.com/rust-lang/const-eval/blob/master/rfcs/0000-const-ub.md
To do this, we now have two queries for obtaining mir: `optimized_mir` and `mir_for_ctfe`. It is now illegal to invoke `optimized_mir` to obtain the MIR of a const/static item's initializer, an array length, an inline const expression or an enum discriminant initializer. For `const fn`, both `optimized_mir` and `mir_for_ctfe` work, the former returning the MIR that LLVM should use if the function is called at runtime. Similarly it is illegal to invoke `mir_for_ctfe` on regular functions.
This is all checked via appropriate assertions and I don't think it is easy to get wrong, as there should be no `mir_for_ctfe` calls outside the const evaluator or metadata encoding. Almost all rustc devs should keep using `optimized_mir` (or `instance_mir` for that matter).
Enhance type inference errors involving the `?` operator
This patch adds a special-cased note on type inference errors when the error span points to a `?` return. It also makes the primary label for such errors "cannot infer type of `?` error" in cases where before we would have only said "cannot infer type".
One beneficiary of this change is async blocks, where we can't explicitly annotate the return type and so may not generate any other help (#77880); this lets us at least print the error type we're converting from and anything we know about the type we can't fully infer. More generally, it signposts that an implicit conversion is happening that may have impeded type inference the user was expecting. We already do something similar for [mismatched type errors](2987785df3/src/test/ui/try-block/try-block-bad-type.stderr (L7)).
The check for a relevant `?` operator is built into the existing HIR traversal which looks for places that could be annotated to resolve the error. That means we could identify `?` uses anywhere in the function that output the type we can't infer, but this patch just sticks to adding the note if the primary span given for the error has the operator; if there are other expressions where the type occurs and one of them is selected for the error instead, it's more likely that the `?` operator's implicit conversion isn't the sole cause of the inference failure and that adding an additional diagnostic would just be noise. I added a ui test for one such case.
The data about the `?` conversion is passed around in a `UseDiagnostic` enum that in theory could be used to add more of this kind of note in the future. It was also just easier to pass around than something with a more specific name. There are some follow-up refactoring commits for the code that generates the error label, which was already pretty involved and made a bit more complicated by this change.