mikros/rust
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
205,907 Commits 2 Branches 0 Tags
Commit Graph

3110 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
8ab71ab59f Auto merge of #100980 - compiler-errors:normalize-opaque-w-bound-vars, r=lcnr 
Normalize opaques w/ bound vars

First, we reenable normalization of opaque types with escaping late bound regions to fix rust-lang/miri#2433. This essentially reverts #89285.

Second, we mitigate the perf regression found in #88862 by simplifying the way that we relate (sub and eq) GeneratorWitness types.

This relies on the fact that we construct these GeneratorWitness types somewhat particularly (with all free regions found in the witness types replaced with late bound regions) -- but those bound regions really should be treated as existential regions, not universal ones. Those two facts leads me to believe that we do not need to use the full `higher_ranked_sub` machinery to relate two generator witnesses. I'm pretty confident that this is correct, but I'm glad to discuss this further.
 2022-09-22 12:47:31 +00:00
bors
7a8636c843 Auto merge of #100982 - fee1-dead-contrib:const-impl-requires-const-trait, r=oli-obk 
Require `#[const_trait]` on `Trait` for `impl const Trait`

r? `@oli-obk`
 2022-09-22 04:22:24 +00:00
Michael Goulet
3fc328dfd3 Normalize generator interior type before erasing 2022-09-22 02:17:39 +00:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5f91719f75 UPDATE - rename SessionSubdiagnostic macro to Subdiagnostic 
Also renames:
- sym::AddSubdiagnostic to sym:: Subdiagnostic
- rustc_diagnostic_item = "AddSubdiagnostic" to rustc_diagnostic_item = "Subdiagnostic"
 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
a3396b2070 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler macro to Diagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
19b348fed4 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler trait to IntoDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
5b8152807c UPDATE - move SessionDiagnostic from rustc_session to rustc_errors 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
Deadbeef
898c76cd82 Make error messages great again (and fix clippy and add test) 2022-09-21 15:02:15 +00:00
Michael Howell
b149c48186
Rollup merge of #102021 - lcnr:tyConst-fun, r=b-naber,BoxyUwU 
some post-valtree cleanup

r? project-const-generics cc ```@b-naber```
 2022-09-20 10:13:01 -07:00
Matthias Krüger
9f073b0de0
Rollup merge of #101904 - Rageking8:fix-101712, r=oli-obk 
Add help for invalid inline argument

Fixes #101712

Removed 1 part of the test as its identical with another one. Do let me know if this is undesirable, so I can revert those changes.
 2022-09-19 17:55:20 +02:00
lcnr
c54c5a3c77 DestructuredConst split mir and ty 2022-09-19 17:00:38 +02:00
lcnr
7207b4dc66 remove FnCtxt::to_const 2022-09-19 16:08:40 +02:00
lcnr
647052fc04 remove the Subst trait, always use EarlyBinder 2022-09-19 11:37:27 +02:00
bors
efa717bc2d Auto merge of #101924 - jackh726:revert-static-hrtb-error, r=compiler-errors 
Re-add HRTB implied static bug note

r? `@compiler-errors` since you reviewed it previously

I deleted a `normalize` call and forgot about it. Whoops.
 2022-09-19 04:56:14 +00:00
Dylan DPC
7c55c992ab
Rollup merge of #101807 - jackh726:no-gat-defaults, r=lcnr 
Disallow defaults on type GATs

Fixes #99205
 2022-09-17 15:31:08 +05:30
Dylan DPC
4c64c14420
Rollup merge of #101790 - TaKO8Ki:do-not-suggest-placeholder-to-const-and-static-without-type, r=compiler-errors 
Do not suggest a placeholder to const and static without a type

Fixes #101755
 2022-09-17 15:31:08 +05:30
Dylan DPC
cbd561d41f
Rollup merge of #98441 - calebzulawski:simd_as, r=oli-obk 
Implement simd_as for pointers

Expands `simd_as` (and `simd_cast`) to handle pointer-to-pointer, pointer-to-integer, and integer-to-pointer conversions.

cc ``@programmerjake`` ``@thomcc``
 2022-09-17 15:31:07 +05:30
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett 
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687895731e12f4a2651e8d70acd08872d (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc330f34213812ad65cae86ced90d80c (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a4477a76bfd18fdcd8f45a939cbed82d34 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963ce95ef4f7d4a81784bb5002ccf63c93 (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c1775f0103a1ebee6ab7c6d9b781a21:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d3075471b3867428788c49f54fffe53f52 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1cefbb8ed8408d2db3f9f7d5afddbf0 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984fda7faa156d1c9cf91aa4934f0e00f (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a27de1b08a0b95592dc8ec93bf0a321a (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea56667703ac06689ff1d6fba5d170fa7392a7 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d8cbcff7d1d14bb34e38fe6fe7c233e (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded8674b89c46052da92399227c3b764c6a (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b566401068cb8450912f6ab48f3d0e60f5cb482 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57120ec1411196214fd0d1c33fb18bf6 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7b8a1c4eee7e065b8cef38ea629a6a3 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c969ed2edd12c674ca05c1baf867f6f6f (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d040b5ee0bc79e6e7f01772adce791b (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c531d52f701b870bb27b45668a44d52 (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a8493b40a557394325a3a713b6528de60 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603ca8b83b9d06e56f74e10e3d410553ff (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d4092045728c1c68282769d555706f273 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d0cf2097a5fdc0bb710442d0f2e7876 (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
 2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
bors
c524c7dd25 Auto merge of #98588 - b-naber:valtrees-cleanup, r=lcnr 
Use only ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system

r? `@lcnr`
 2022-09-17 03:04:22 +00:00
Jack Huey
6075877c89 Pass ConstraintCategory thorough a few more places 2022-09-16 16:44:18 -04:00
bors
4d4e51e428 Auto merge of #101902 - jackh726:revert-static-hrtb-error, r=nikomatsakis 
Partially revert #101433

reverts #101433 to fix #101844

We should get this into the beta cut, since the ICE is getting hit quite a bit.
 2022-09-16 16:46:14 +00:00
Rageking8
b248a6faf9 add help for invalid inline argument 2022-09-16 23:57:08 +08:00
Jack Huey
92b759f517 Revert "Better errors for implied static bound" 
This reverts commit c75817b0a75d4b6b01ee10900ba5d01d4915e6a8.
 2022-09-16 09:47:07 -04:00
Dylan DPC
edf9e5eb63
Rollup merge of #101753 - oli-obk:tait_closure_args, r=compiler-errors 
Prefer explict closure sig types over expected ones

fixes #100800

Previously we only checked that given closure arguments are equal to expected closure arguments, but now we choose the given closure arguments for the signature that is used when type checking the closure body, and keep the other signature for the type of the closure as seen outside of it.
 2022-09-16 11:17:01 +05:30
Deadbeef
5ead742e18 remap ParamEnv with obligation 2022-09-16 12:08:46 +08:00
Deadbeef
f8813cf10e do const trait method bounds check later in rustc_const_eval 2022-09-16 11:48:43 +08:00
Deadbeef
77b0c47b82 Normalize param_env for trait assoc consts in typeck 2022-09-16 11:48:43 +08:00
Takayuki Maeda
527292a1a6 do not suggest a placeholder to const and static without a type 2022-09-16 11:24:14 +09:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap 
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
 2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
Ding Xiang Fei
635b57c2ed
enclose else block in terminating scope 2022-09-15 10:08:12 +08:00
Ding Xiang Fei
34f0c4502f
supplement for the missing or incomplete comments 2022-09-15 10:08:11 +08:00
Ding Xiang Fei
1b87ce0d40
reorder nesting scopes and declare bindings without drop schedule 2022-09-15 10:07:54 +08:00
bors
6153d3cbe6 Auto merge of #101212 - eholk:dyn-star, r=compiler-errors 
Initial implementation of dyn*

This PR adds extremely basic and incomplete support for [dyn*](https://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps//blog/2022/03/29/dyn-can-we-make-dyn-sized/). The goal is to get something in tree behind a flag to make collaboration easier, and also to make sure the implementation so far is not unreasonable. This PR does quite a few things:

* Introduce `dyn_star` feature flag
* Adds parsing for `dyn* Trait` types
* Defines `dyn* Trait` as a sized type
* Adds support for explicit casts, like `42usize as dyn* Debug`
  * Including const evaluation of such casts
* Adds codegen for drop glue so things are cleaned up properly when a `dyn* Trait` object goes out of scope
* Adds codegen for method calls, at least for methods that take `&self`

Quite a bit is still missing, but this gives us a starting point. Note that this is never intended to become stable surface syntax for Rust, but rather `dyn*` is planned to be used as an implementation detail for async functions in dyn traits.

Joint work with `@nikomatsakis` and `@compiler-errors.`

r? `@bjorn3`
 2022-09-14 18:10:51 +00:00
Jack Huey
d657d1f4a1 Disallow defaults on type GATs 2022-09-14 13:03:01 -04:00
Dylan DPC
430123164f
Rollup merge of #101433 - jackh726:better-static-placeholder-error, r=compiler-errors 
Emit a note that static bounds from HRTBs are a bug

This note isn't perfect, but opening this to either 1) land as is or 2) get some feedback on how to improve it

Let r? `@compiler-errors` and cc. `@nikomatsakis`
 2022-09-14 19:26:18 +05:30
Oli Scherer
7794ea5854 Prefer explict closure sig types over expected ones 2022-09-14 10:44:56 +00:00
bors
a0d1df4a5d Auto merge of #101709 - nnethercote:simplify-visitors-more, r=cjgillot 
Simplify visitors more

A successor to #100392.

r? `@cjgillot`
 2022-09-14 05:21:14 +00:00
Jack Huey
c75817b0a7 Better errors for implied static bound 2022-09-13 20:18:04 -04:00
Eric Holk
cf04547b0b Address code review comments 2022-09-13 14:50:12 -07:00
b-naber
a4bbb8db5c use ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system 2022-09-13 17:40:59 +02:00
bors
1ce51982b8 Auto merge of #101615 - compiler-errors:rpitit-perf, r=oli-obk 
Make `compare_predicate_entailment` no longer a query

Make `compare_predicate_entailment` so it's no longer a query (again), and splits out the new logic (that equates the return types to infer RPITITs) into its own query. This means that this new query (now called `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys`) is no longer executed for non-RPITIT cases.

This should improve perf (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101224#issuecomment-1241682203), though in practice we see that these some crates remain from the primary regressions list on the original report... They are all <= 0.43% regression and seemingly only on the incr-full scenario for all of them.

I am at a loss for what might be causing this regression other than what I fixed here, since we don't introduce much new non-RPITIT logic except for some `def_kind` query calls in some places, for example, like projection. Maybe that's it?

----

Originally this PR was opened to test enabling `cache_on_disk` (62164aaaa11) but that didn't turn out to be very useful (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/101615#issuecomment-1242403205), so that led me to just split the query (and rename the PR).
 2022-09-13 15:33:06 +00:00
Eric Holk
3c2d20ef0b Make x.py check work 2022-09-12 17:29:11 -07:00
Michael Goulet
b2ed2dcaae Rename some variants 2022-09-12 16:55:59 -07:00
Eric Holk
549c105bb3 dyn* through more typechecking and MIR 2022-09-12 16:55:56 -07:00
Eric Holk
7fccac3ea0 Typecheck dyn* coercions 
Also changes things to treat dyn* as a sized type, unlike dyn Trait.
 2022-09-12 16:55:56 -07:00
Eric Holk
6c01273a15 Plumb dyn trait representation through ty::Dynamic 2022-09-12 16:55:55 -07:00
Guillaume Gomez
b7504d6f4f
Rollup merge of #100185 - compiler-errors:issue-100183, r=wesleywiser 
Fix `ReErased` leaking into typeck due to `typeof(...)` recovery

Fixes #100183
 2022-09-12 22:47:13 +02:00
bors
7f115e3cd2 Auto merge of #101716 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-ayvh6nd, r=Dylan-DPC 
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100293 (Add inline-llvm option for disabling/enabling LLVM inlining)
 - #100767 (Remove manual <[u8]>::escape_ascii)
 - #101668 (Suggest pub instead of public for const type item)
 - #101671 (Fix naming format of IEEE 754 standard)
 - #101676 (Check that the types in return position `impl Trait` in traits are well-formed)
 - #101681 (Deny return-position `impl Trait` in traits for object safety)
 - #101693 (Update browser UI test 0 10)
 - #101701 (Rustdoc-Json: Add tests for trait impls.)
 - #101706 (rustdoc: remove no-op `#search`)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
 2022-09-12 13:16:14 +00:00
Dylan DPC
5faf033f62
Rollup merge of #101676 - compiler-errors:rpitit-wf, r=lcnr 
Check that the types in return position `impl Trait` in traits are well-formed

This effectively duplicates `check_associated_type_bounds`, but that shouldn't be for long, since we're going to remove it once we refactor RPITITs into regular associated items.

Fixes #101663

---

We don't check

```rust
trait Foo {
  fn bar() -> impl ?Sized;
}
```

currently, but that's for a different reason, which is that we don't currently check that a trait function's return type is sized (i.e. `fn bar() -> [u8]` also works in a trait).
 2022-09-12 15:21:33 +05:30
bors
a93214ec06 Auto merge of #101604 - compiler-errors:issue-101465, r=lcnr 
Fix ICE in opt_suggest_box_span

We were _totally_ mishandling substs and obligations in `opt_suggest_box_span`, so I reworked that function pretty heavily.

Also some drive-by changes, namely removing `ret_type_span`.

Fixes #101465
 2022-09-12 08:46:40 +00:00