rustdoc: process cross-crate glob re-exports
Turns out, we were deliberately ignoring glob re-exports when they were occurring across crates, even though we were fully processing them for local re-exports. This will at least bring the two into parity.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/51252
Since they are unlikely to fail and are almost never going to fail
except with bootstrap changes (which would be tested locally anyway) it
makes sense to run these tests close to last.
Remove `?` macro separator compatibility note from 1.27 release notes
The implementation has been reverted in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51417, so this no longer applies to 1.27.0.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum
rustc: rename ty::maps to ty::query.
Should've never been `maps` but "query system/engine" didn't fully settle from the start.
r? @michaelwoerister or @nikomatsakis
Speed up obligation forest code
Here are the rustc-perf benchmarks that get at least a 1% speedup on one or more of their runs with these patches applied:
```
inflate-check
avg: -8.7% min: -12.1% max: 0.0%
inflate
avg: -5.9% min: -8.6% max: 1.1%
inflate-opt
avg: -1.5% min: -2.0% max: -0.3%
clap-rs-check
avg: -0.6% min: -1.9% max: 0.5%
coercions
avg: -0.2%? min: -1.3%? max: 0.6%?
serde-opt
avg: -0.6% min: -1.0% max: 0.1%
coercions-check
avg: -0.4%? min: -1.0%? max: -0.0%?
```
Refactor: Rename ExistentialPredicate::cmp to ExistentialPredicate::stable_cmp
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/51276#discussion_r193549404 for
rationale.
Because stable_cmp takes three arguments and Ord::cmp takes two, I am confident that there is no shadowing happening here.
r? @nikomatsakis
Fix the recent spurious breakage on AppVeyor.
Fixed the spurious error introduced by d2b5b7603b due to a wrongly resolved relative path on AppVeyor.
This only starts to happen today because we just entered the last week of the 6-week cycle.
In the `#building` section, the doc read that a default configuration "shall use around 3.5 GB of disk space." Changed "shall use" to "requires," as I don't think it's meant to sound so prescriptive.
Removed various update-reference and update-all-references scripts
A PR that addresses #50853 changes that made `update-reference` and `update-all-references` scripts obsolete.
Improve core::task::TaskObj
- Rename `UnsafePoll` to `UnsafeTask` to avoid confusion with `Poll`
- Rename `TaskObj::from_poll_task()` to `TaskObj::new()`
- Rename `TaskObj`'s `poll` and `drop` fields to `poll_fn` and `drop_fn`
- Implement `Future` for `TaskObj`. Reason: It's a custom trait object for a future, so it should implement future
- Remove `unsafe impl Sync` for `TaskObj`. I don't think we need it. Was this safe? `UnsafeTask` only requires to implement `Send`
@cramertj
@aturon
