Remove pretty printing of specific nodes in AST
The ability to print a specific item as identified by NodeId or path
seems not particularly useful, and certainly carries quite a bit of
complexity with it.
This is intended to simplify our CLI parsing a bit and remove a
non-uncomplicated piece of it; I largely did this to remove the
dependency on NodeId from librustc/session but it's not really
necessary to do so in this invasive a way. The alternative is
moving it to librustc_interface or driver, probably.
*Syntactically* permit visibilities on trait items & enum variants
Fixes#65041
Suppose we have `$vis trait_item` or `$vis enum_variant` and `$vis` is a `:vis` macro fragment. Before this PR, this would fail to parse. This is now instead allowed as per language team consensus in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/65041#issuecomment-538105286. (See added tests for elaboration.)
Moreover, we now also permit visibility modifiers on trait items & enum variants *syntactically* but reject them with semantic checks (in `ast_validation`):
```rust
#[cfg(FALSE)]
trait Foo { pub fn bar(); } // OK
#[cfg(FALSE)]
enum E { pub U } // OK
```
Some environment variables (like DEPLOY or DEPLOY_ALT for dist builders,
or IMAGE on Linux builders) are set on a lot of builders, and whether
they should be present or not can be detected automatically based on the
builder name and the platform.
This commit simplifies the CI configuration by automatically setting
those environment variables.
Add a proc-macro to derive HashStable in librustc dependencies
A second proc-macro is added to derive HashStable for crates librustc depends on.
This proc-macro HashStable_Generic (to bikeshed) allows to decouple code and some librustc's boilerplate.
Not everything is migrated, because `Span` and `TokenKind` require to be placed inside librustc.
Types using them stay there too.
Split out of #66279
r? @Zoxc
Move process_configure_mod to rustc_parse
This removes the hack in favor of perhaps a less principled, but less painful, approach.
This also supports my work to decouple `Session` from librustc, as `ParseSess` currently has `Attribute` as "part" of it but after this PR will no longer do so.
Delay an `is_local_ever_initialized` call.
This commit moves the call after a `return` that almost always runs. It
speeds up the `unicode_normalization` benchmark by about 2%.
r? @spastorino
Support multiple revisions in `compiletest`
The `//[X]~` syntax filters errors for tests that are run across multiple cfgs with `// revisions:`. This commit extends that syntax to accept `//[X,Y]~`, which will match multiple cfgs to the same error annotation. This is functionally the same as writing two comments, `//[X]~` and `//[Y]~`, but can fit on a single line.
While refactoring `compiletest` to support this, I also uncovered a small bug that was causing an incremental test to always pass, despite no errors being emitted.
r? @Centril
This creates a new test directory, `ui/consts/control-flow` to hold
tests related to control flow in a const context. It also blesses all
existing tests with the new error messages, and adds new tests for the
`const_if_match` feature.
[mir-opt] asking `?`s in a more optimized fashion
This PR works towards https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/66234 by providing two optimization passes meant to run in sequence:
- `SimplifyArmIdentity` which transforms something like:
```rust
_LOCAL_TMP = ((_LOCAL_1 as Variant ).FIELD: TY );
((_LOCAL_0 as Variant).FIELD: TY) = move _LOCAL_TMP;
discriminant(_LOCAL_0) = VAR_IDX;
```
into:
```rust
_LOCAL_0 = move _LOCAL_1
```
- `SimplifyBranchSame` which transforms `SwitchInt`s to identical basic blocks into a `goto` to the first reachable target.
Together, these are meant to simplify the following into just `res`:
```rust
match res {
Ok(x) => Ok(x),
Err(x) => Err(x),
}
```
It should be noted however that the desugaring of `?` includes a function call and so the first pass in this PR relies on inlining to substitute that function call for identity on `x`. Inlining requires `mir-opt-level=2` so this might not have any effect in perf-bot but let's find out.
r? @oli-obk -- This is WIP, but I'd appreciate feedback. :)
These are generated when matching on enum variants to extract the value
within. We should have no problem evaluating these, but care should be
taken that we aren't accidentally allowing some other operation.
