optimize field ordering by grouping m*2^n-sized fields with equivalently aligned ones
```rust
use std::ptr::addr_of;
use std::mem;
struct Foo {
word: u32,
byte: u8,
ary: [u8; 4]
}
fn main() {
let foo: Foo = unsafe { mem::zeroed() };
println!("base: {:p}\nword: {:p}\nbyte: {:p}\nary: {:p}", &foo, addr_of!(foo.word), addr_of!(foo.byte), addr_of!(foo.ary));
}
```
prints
```
base: 0x7fffc1a8a668
word: 0x7fffc1a8a668
byte: 0x7fffc1a8a66c
ary: 0x7fffc1a8a66d
```
I.e. the `u8` in the middle causes the array to sit at an odd offset, which might prevent optimizations, especially on architectures where unaligned loads are costly.
Note that this will make field ordering niche-dependent, i.e. a `Bar<T>` with `T=char` and `T=u32` may result in different field order, this may break some code that makes invalid assumptions about `repr(Rust)` types.
Lower return type outside async block creation
This allows feeding a different output type to async blocks with a different `ImplTraitContext`. Spotted this while working on #104321
Refactor must_use lint into two parts
Before, the lint did the checking for `must_use` and pretty printing the types in a special format in one pass, causing quite complex and untranslatable code.
Now the collection and printing is split in two. That should also make it easier to translate or extract the type pretty printing in the future.
Also fixes an integer overflow in the array length pluralization
calculation.
fixes#104352
Use `tcx.require_lang_item` instead of unwrapping lang items
I clearly remember esteban telling me that there is `require_lang_item` but he was from a phone atm and I couldn't find it, so I didn't use it. Stumbled on it today, so here we are :)
Remove a lifetime resolution hack from `compare_predicate_entailment`
This is not needed anymore, probably due to #102334 equating the function signatures fully in `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys`. Also, the assertion in in #102903 makes sure that this is actually fixed, so I'm pretty confident this isn't needed.
Only declare bindings for if-let guards once per arm
Currently, each candidate for a match arm uses separate locals for the bindings in the if-let guard, causing problems (#88015) when those branches converge in the arm body.
Fixes#88015 (🤞)
Check generics parity before collecting return-position `impl Trait`s in trait
The only thing is that this duplicates the error message for number of generics mismatch, but we already deduplicate that error message in Cargo. I could add a flag to delay the error if the reviewer cares.
Fixes#104281
Also drive-by adds a few comments to the `collect_trait_impl_trait_tys` method, and removes an unused argument from `compare_number_of_generics`.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #103396 (Pin::new_unchecked: discuss pinning closure captures)
- #104416 (Fix using `include_bytes` in pattern position)
- #104557 (Add a test case for async dyn* traits)
- #104559 (Split `MacArgs` in two.)
- #104597 (Probe + better error messsage for `need_migrate_deref_output_trait_object`)
- #104656 (Move tests)
- #104657 (Do not check transmute if has non region infer)
- #104663 (rustdoc: factor out common button CSS)
- #104666 (Migrate alias search result to CSS variables)
- #104674 (Make negative_impl and negative_impl_exists take the right types)
- #104692 (Update test's cfg-if dependency to 1.0)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Probe + better error messsage for `need_migrate_deref_output_trait_object`
1. Use `InferCtxt::probe` in `need_migrate_deref_output_trait_object` -- that normalization *could* technically do type inference as a side-effect, and this is a lint, so it should have no side-effects.
2. Return the trait-ref so we format the error message correctly. See the UI test change -- `(dyn A + 'static)` is not a trait.
Split `MacArgs` in two.
`MacArgs` is an enum with three variants: `Empty`, `Delimited`, and `Eq`. It's used in two ways:
- For representing attribute macro arguments (e.g. in `AttrItem`), where all three variants are used.
- For representing function-like macros (e.g. in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`), where only the `Delimited` variant is used.
In other words, `MacArgs` is used in two quite different places due to them having partial overlap. I find this makes the code hard to read. It also leads to various unreachable code paths, and allows invalid values (such as accidentally using `MacArgs::Empty` in a `MacCall`).
This commit splits `MacArgs` in two:
- `DelimArgs` is a new struct just for the "delimited arguments" case. It is now used in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`.
- `AttrArgs` is a renaming of the old `MacArgs` enum for the attribute macro case. Its `Delimited` variant now contains a `DelimArgs`.
Various other related things are renamed as well.
These changes make the code clearer, avoids several unreachable paths, and disallows the invalid values.
r? `@petrochenkov`
`MacArgs` is an enum with three variants: `Empty`, `Delimited`, and `Eq`. It's
used in two ways:
- For representing attribute macro arguments (e.g. in `AttrItem`), where all
three variants are used.
- For representing function-like macros (e.g. in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`),
where only the `Delimited` variant is used.
In other words, `MacArgs` is used in two quite different places due to them
having partial overlap. I find this makes the code hard to read. It also leads
to various unreachable code paths, and allows invalid values (such as
accidentally using `MacArgs::Empty` in a `MacCall`).
This commit splits `MacArgs` in two:
- `DelimArgs` is a new struct just for the "delimited arguments" case. It is
now used in `MacCall` and `MacroDef`.
- `AttrArgs` is a renaming of the old `MacArgs` enum for the attribute macro
case. Its `Delimited` variant now contains a `DelimArgs`.
Various other related things are renamed as well.
These changes make the code clearer, avoids several unreachable paths, and
disallows the invalid values.
