Make tests capture the error printed by a Result return
An error returned by tests previously would get written directly to stderr, instead of to the capture buffer set up by the test harness. This PR makes it write to the capture buffer so that it can be integrated as part of the test output by build tools such as `buck test`, since being able to read the error message returned by a test is pretty critical to debugging why the test failed.
<br>
**Before:**
```rust
// tests/test.rs
#[test]
fn test() -> Result<(), &'static str> {
println!("STDOUT");
eprintln!("STDERR");
Err("RESULT")
}
```
```console
$ cargo build --test test
$ target/debug/deps/test-???????????????? -Z unstable-options --format=json
{ "type": "suite", "event": "started", "test_count": 1 }
{ "type": "test", "event": "started", "name": "test" }
Error: "RESULT"
{ "type": "test", "name": "test", "event": "failed", "stdout": "STDOUT\nSTDERR\n" }
{ "type": "suite", "event": "failed", "passed": 0, "failed": 1, "ignored": 0, "measured": 0, "filtered_out": 0, "exec_time": 0.00040313 }
```
**After:**
```console
$ target/debug/deps/test-???????????????? -Z unstable-options --format=json
{ "type": "suite", "event": "started", "test_count": 1 }
{ "type": "test", "event": "started", "name": "test" }
{ "type": "test", "name": "test", "event": "failed", "stdout": "STDOUT\nSTDERR\nError: \"RESULT\"" }
{ "type": "suite", "event": "failed", "passed": 0, "failed": 1, "ignored": 0, "measured": 0, "filtered_out": 0, "exec_time": 0.000261894 }
```
Uplift `clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles` lint into rustc
This PR, as the title suggests, uplifts [`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`] lint into rustc. This lint warns for code like this:
```rust
for _ in Some(1) {}
for _ in Ok::<_, ()>(1) {}
```
i.e. directly iterating over `Option` and `Result` using `for` loop.
There are a number of suggestions that this PR adds (on top of what clippy suggested):
1. If the argument (? is there a better name for that expression) of a `for` loop is a `.next()` call, then we can suggest removing it (or rather replacing with `.by_ref()` to allow iterator being used later)
```rust
for _ in iter.next() {}
// turns into
for _ in iter.by_ref() {}
```
2. (otherwise) We can suggest using `while let`, this is useful for non-iterator, iterator-like things like [async] channels
```rust
for _ in rx.recv() {}
// turns into
while let Some(_) = rx.recv() {}
```
3. If the argument type is `Result<impl IntoIterator, _>` and the body has a `Result<_, _>` type, we can suggest using `?`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
for _ in f()? {}
```
4. To preserve the original behavior and clear intent, we can suggest using `if let`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
if let Some(_) = f() {}
```
(P.S. `Some` and `Ok` are interchangeable depending on the type)
I still feel that the lint wording/look is somewhat off, so I'll be happy to hear suggestions (on how to improve suggestions :D)!
Resolves#99272
[`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loops_over_fallibles
add Vec::push_within_capacity - fallible, does not allocate
This method can serve several purposes. It
* is fallible
* guarantees that items in Vec aren't moved
* allows loops that do `reserve` and `push` separately to avoid pulling in the allocation machinery a second time in the `push` part which should make things easier on the optimizer
* eases the path towards `ArrayVec` a bit since - compared to `push()` - there are fewer questions around how it should be implemented
I haven't named it `try_push` because that should probably occupy a middle ground that will still try to reserve and only return an error in the unlikely OOM case.
resolves#84649
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #101118 (fs::get_mode enable getting the data via fcntl/F_GETFL on major BSD)
- #102072 (Add `ptr::Alignment` type)
- #102799 (rustdoc: remove hover gap in file picker)
- #102820 (Show let-else suggestion on stable.)
- #102829 (rename `ImplItemKind::TyAlias` to `ImplItemKind::Type`)
- #102831 (Don't use unnormalized type in `Ty::fn_sig` call in rustdoc `clean_middle_ty`)
- #102834 (Remove unnecessary `lift`/`lift_to_tcx` calls from rustdoc)
- #102838 (remove cfg(bootstrap) from Miri)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
the kernel currently enforce that a stack is immutable. calling mmap(2) or
mprotect(2) to change it will result in EPERM, which generate a panic!().
so just do like for Linux, and trust the kernel to do the right thing.
Reduce CString allocations in std as much as possible
Currently, every operation involving paths in `fs` allocates memory to hold the path before sending it through the syscall. This PR instead uses a stack allocation (chosen size is somewhat arbitrary) when the path is short before falling back to heap allocations for long paths.
Benchmarks show that the stack allocation is ~2x faster for short paths:
```
test sys::unix::fd::tests::bench_heap_path_alloc ... bench: 34 ns/iter (+/- 2)
test sys::unix::fd::tests::bench_stack_path_alloc ... bench: 15 ns/iter (+/- 1)
```
For long paths, I couldn't find any measurable difference.
---
I'd be surprised if I was the first to think of this, so I didn't fully flush out the PR. If this change is desirable, I'll make use of `run_with_cstr` across all platforms in every fs method (currently just unix open for testing). I also added an `impl From<FromBytesWithNulError>` which is presumably a no-no (or at least needs to be done in another PR).
---
Also see https://github.com/nix-rust/nix/pull/1655 with a bunch of discussion where I'm doing something similar.
Remove empty core::lazy and std::lazy
PR #98165 with commits 7c360dc117d554a11f7193505da0835c4b890c6f and c1a2db3372a4d6896744919284f3287650a38ab7 has moved all of the components of these modules into different places, namely {std,core}::sync and {std,core}::cell. The empty modules remained. As they are unstable, we can simply remove them.
`EscapeAscii` is not an `ExactSizeIterator`
Fixes#99878
Do we want/need `EscapeAscii` to be an `ExactSizeIterator`? I guess we could precompute the length of the output if so?
add a few more assert_unsafe_precondition
Add debug-assertion checking for `ptr.read()`, `ptr.write(_)`, and `unreachable_unchecked.`
This is quite useful for [cargo-careful](https://github.com/RalfJung/cargo-careful).
PR #98165 with commits 7c360dc117d554a11f7193505da0835c4b890c6f and c1a2db3372a4d6896744919284f3287650a38ab7
has moved all of the components of these modules into different places,
namely {std,core}::sync and {std,core}::cell. The empty
modules remained. As they are unstable, we can simply remove them.
std: use futex in `Once`
Now that we have efficient locks, let's optimize the rest of `sync` as well. This PR adds a futex-based implementation for `Once`, which drastically simplifies the implementation compared to the generic version, which is provided as fallback for platforms without futex (Windows only supports them on newer versions, so it uses the fallback for now).
Instead of storing a linked list of waiters, the new implementation adds another state (`QUEUED`), which is set when there are waiting threads. These now use `futex_wait` on that state and are woken by the running thread when it finishes and notices the `QUEUED` state, thereby avoiding unnecessary calls to `futex_wake_all`.
Avoid repeated re-initialization of the BufReader buffer
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102727
We accidentally removed this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98748. It looks so redundant. But it isn't.
The default `Read::read_buf` will defensively initialize the whole buffer, if any of it is indicated to be uninitialized. In uses where reads from the wrapped `Read` impl completely fill the `BufReader`, `initialized` and `filled` are the same, and this extra member isn't required. But in the reported issue, the `BufReader` wraps a `Read` impl which will _never_ fill the whole buffer. So the default `Read::read_buf` implementation repeatedly re-initializes the extra space in the buffer.
This adds back the extra `initialized` member, which ensures that the default `Read::read_buf` only zero-initialized the buffer once, and I've tried to add a comment which explains this whole situation.
unsafe keyword: trait examples and unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn update
Having a safe `fn` in an `unsafe trait` vs an `unsafe fn` in a safe `trait` are pretty different situations, but the distinction is subtle and can confuse even seasoned Rust developers. So let's have explicit examples of both. I also removed the existing `unsafe trait` example since it was rather strange.
Also the `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` lint can help disentangle the two sides of `unsafe`, so update the docs to account for that.
Use a macro to not have to copy-paste `ConstFnMutClosure::new(&mut fold, NeverShortCircuit::wrap_mut_2_imp)).0` everywhere
Also use that macro to replace a bunch of places that had custom closure-wrappers.
+35 -114 sounds good to me.
Fix overconstrained Send impls in btree internals
Fixes https://github.com/dtolnay/async-trait/issues/215.
Minimal repro:
```rust
use std::collections::btree_map::Iter;
fn require_send<T: Send>(_: T) {}
fn main() {
require_send(async {
let _iter = None::<Iter<(), &()>>;
async {}.await;
});
}
```
```console
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> src/main.rs:6:5
|
6 | / require_send(async {
7 | | let _iter = None::<Iter<(), &()>>;
8 | | async {}.await;
9 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
```
Not-quite-so-minimal repro:
```rust
use std::collections::BTreeMap;
use std::future::Future;
fn spawn<T: Future + Send>(_: T) {}
async fn f() {
let map = BTreeMap::<u32, Box<dyn Send + Sync>>::new();
for _ in &map {
async {}.await;
}
}
fn main() {
spawn(f());
}
```
```console
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> src/main.rs:14:5
|
14 | spawn(f());
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
```
I am not familiar with the btree internals, but it seems clear to me that the `async fn f` above should return a Send future. Using HashMap instead of BTreeMap in that code makes it already return a Send future.
The _"higher-ranked lifetime error"_ message may be a regression in Rust 1.63. Using older compilers the error message was more detailed:
```console
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> src/main.rs:14:5
|
14 | spawn(f());
| ^^^^^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `alloc::collections::btree::node::NodeRef<alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::Immut<'0>, u32, Box<(dyn Send + Sync + '1)>, alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::LeafOrInternal>`, for any two lifetimes `'0` and `'1`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `alloc::collections::btree::node::NodeRef<alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::Immut<'2>, u32, Box<dyn Send + Sync>, alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::LeafOrInternal>`, for some specific lifetime `'2`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> src/main.rs:14:5
|
14 | spawn(f());
| ^^^^^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `alloc::collections::btree::node::NodeRef<alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::Immut<'0>, u32, Box<(dyn Send + Sync + '1)>, alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::Leaf>`, for any two lifetimes `'0` and `'1`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `alloc::collections::btree::node::NodeRef<alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::Immut<'2>, u32, Box<dyn Send + Sync>, alloc::collections::btree::node::marker::Leaf>`, for some specific lifetime `'2`
```
After calling libc::fork, the child process tried to access
a TLS variable when processing a panic. This caused
a memory allocation which is UB in the child.
To prevent this from happening, the panic handler will
not access the TLS variable in case `panic::always_abort`
was called before.
Currently pretty much all of the btree_map and btree_set ones fail, as
well as linked_list::DrainFilter.
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:38:5
|
38 | / require_send_sync(async {
39 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::Iter<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
40 | | async {}.await;
41 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:56:5
|
56 | / require_send_sync(async {
57 | | let _v = None::<
58 | | alloc::collections::btree_map::DrainFilter<
59 | | '_,
... |
65 | | async {}.await;
66 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:68:5
|
68 | / require_send_sync(async {
69 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::Entry<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
70 | | async {}.await;
71 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:88:5
|
88 | / require_send_sync(async {
89 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::Iter<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
90 | | async {}.await;
91 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:93:5
|
93 | / require_send_sync(async {
94 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::IterMut<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
95 | | async {}.await;
96 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:98:5
|
98 | / require_send_sync(async {
99 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::Keys<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
100 | | async {}.await;
101 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:103:5
|
103 | / require_send_sync(async {
104 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::OccupiedEntry<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
105 | | async {}.await;
106 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:108:5
|
108 | / require_send_sync(async {
109 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::OccupiedError<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
110 | | async {}.await;
111 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:113:5
|
113 | / require_send_sync(async {
114 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::Range<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
115 | | async {}.await;
116 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:118:5
|
118 | / require_send_sync(async {
119 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::RangeMut<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
120 | | async {}.await;
121 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:123:5
|
123 | / require_send_sync(async {
124 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::VacantEntry<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
125 | | async {}.await;
126 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:128:5
|
128 | / require_send_sync(async {
129 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::Values<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
130 | | async {}.await;
131 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:133:5
|
133 | / require_send_sync(async {
134 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_map::ValuesMut<'_, &u32, &u32>>;
135 | | async {}.await;
136 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:146:5
|
146 | / require_send_sync(async {
147 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_set::Difference<'_, &u32>>;
148 | | async {}.await;
149 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: implementation of `Send` is not general enough
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:151:5
|
151 | / require_send_sync(async {
152 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_set::DrainFilter<'_, &u32, fn(&&u32) -> bool>>;
153 | | async {}.await;
154 | | });
| |______^ implementation of `Send` is not general enough
|
= note: `Send` would have to be implemented for the type `&'0 u32`, for any lifetime `'0`...
= note: ...but `Send` is actually implemented for the type `&'1 u32`, for some specific lifetime `'1`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:156:5
|
156 | / require_send_sync(async {
157 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_set::Intersection<'_, &u32>>;
158 | | async {}.await;
159 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:166:5
|
166 | / require_send_sync(async {
167 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_set::Iter<'_, &u32>>;
168 | | async {}.await;
169 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:171:5
|
171 | / require_send_sync(async {
172 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_set::Range<'_, &u32>>;
173 | | async {}.await;
174 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:176:5
|
176 | / require_send_sync(async {
177 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_set::SymmetricDifference<'_, &u32>>;
178 | | async {}.await;
179 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: higher-ranked lifetime error
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:181:5
|
181 | / require_send_sync(async {
182 | | let _v = None::<alloc::collections::btree_set::Union<'_, &u32>>;
183 | | async {}.await;
184 | | });
| |______^
|
= note: could not prove `impl Future<Output = ()>: Send`
error: future cannot be sent between threads safely
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:243:23
|
243 | require_send_sync(async {
| _______________________^
244 | | let _v =
245 | | None::<alloc::collections::linked_list::DrainFilter<'_, &u32, fn(&mut &u32) -> bool>>;
246 | | async {}.await;
247 | | });
| |_____^ future created by async block is not `Send`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Send` is not implemented for `NonNull<std::collections::linked_list::Node<&u32>>`
note: future is not `Send` as this value is used across an await
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:246:17
|
244 | let _v =
| -- has type `Option<std::collections::linked_list::DrainFilter<'_, &u32, for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a mut &'b u32) -> bool>>` which is not `Send`
245 | None::<alloc::collections::linked_list::DrainFilter<'_, &u32, fn(&mut &u32) -> bool>>;
246 | async {}.await;
| ^^^^^^ await occurs here, with `_v` maybe used later
247 | });
| - `_v` is later dropped here
note: required by a bound in `require_send_sync`
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:3:25
|
3 | fn require_send_sync<T: Send + Sync>(_: T) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `require_send_sync`
error: future cannot be shared between threads safely
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:243:23
|
243 | require_send_sync(async {
| _______________________^
244 | | let _v =
245 | | None::<alloc::collections::linked_list::DrainFilter<'_, &u32, fn(&mut &u32) -> bool>>;
246 | | async {}.await;
247 | | });
| |_____^ future created by async block is not `Sync`
|
= help: within `impl Future<Output = ()>`, the trait `Sync` is not implemented for `NonNull<std::collections::linked_list::Node<&u32>>`
note: future is not `Sync` as this value is used across an await
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:246:17
|
244 | let _v =
| -- has type `Option<std::collections::linked_list::DrainFilter<'_, &u32, for<'a, 'b> fn(&'a mut &'b u32) -> bool>>` which is not `Sync`
245 | None::<alloc::collections::linked_list::DrainFilter<'_, &u32, fn(&mut &u32) -> bool>>;
246 | async {}.await;
| ^^^^^^ await occurs here, with `_v` maybe used later
247 | });
| - `_v` is later dropped here
note: required by a bound in `require_send_sync`
--> library/alloc/tests/autotraits.rs:3:32
|
3 | fn require_send_sync<T: Send + Sync>(_: T) {}
| ^^^^ required by this bound in `require_send_sync`
The EH actions stored in the LSDA follows the format of GCC except table
(even for LLVM-generated code). An missing action in the table is the
encoding for `Terminate`, see [1].
The currently code interprets it as `None`, as a workaround for #35011,
an issue that seems to occur in LLVM 3.7 and not after 3.9. These are
very old versions of LLVM and we don't support them anymore, so remove
this workaround and interpret them properly.
Note that LLVM currently does not emit any `Terminate` actions, but GCC
does. Although GCC backend currently doesn't do unwinding, removing it
preemptively would prevent future developers from wasting time to figure
out what's wrong.
[1]: https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/master/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/libsupc%2B%2B/eh_personality.cc#L522-L526
